This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
I wonder if the original program was already broken or was this something your conversion introduced?
Looking further down the table a lot of the differences on empty-after-optimization functions (lots of 5 vs 2 bytes) seem to be that gcc-head uses frame pointers and the other compiler doesn't. Clearly for a fair comparison these settings should be the same.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |