This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Bug in x86-64 psABI or in gcc?


On 12/09/2009 06:56 AM, Michael Matz wrote:
>>
>> Aren't bits in the _Bool byte of"bar" specified by the psABI
> 
> Right now they are specified in the psABI, you suggested to remove that 
> specification.
> 

The intent of H.J.'s proposal is to require bits <7:1> == 0 in all cases
(and higher bits as don't cares, the same way a char is passed), as
opposed to the current text which requires <63:1> == 0 when passed as
registers or on the stack (and <7:1> == 0 when stored in a memory
object.)  Furthermore, the current psABI text is inconsistent for
arguments are return values; this is a bug in the wordsmithing of the
text rather than intentional, if I remember the original discussions
correctly.

	-hpa

-- 
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]