This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: BUG: GCC-4.4.x changes the function frame on some functions
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa at zytor dot com>
- To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds at linux-foundation dot org>
- Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx at linutronix dot de>, Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>, rostedt at goodmis dot org, David Daney <ddaney at caviumnetworks dot com>, Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>, Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo at elte dot hu>, LKML <linux-kernel at vger dot kernel dot org>, Andrew Morton <akpm at linux-foundation dot org>, Heiko Carstens <heiko dot carstens at de dot ibm dot com>, feng dot tang at intel dot com, Fr??d??ric Weisbecker <fweisbec at gmail dot com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz at infradead dot org>, jakub at redhat dot com, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 17:29:14 -0800
- Subject: Re: BUG: GCC-4.4.x changes the function frame on some functions
- References: <viy9pk4xossnb6m2v041qu00.1258665258503@email.android.com> <4B05B7AD.20500@redhat.com> <1258670580.22249.1002.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> <4B05DBBF.5000804@redhat.com> <alpine.LFD.2.00.0911200122190.24119@localhost.localdomain> <alpine.LFD.2.00.0911191652430.2793@localhost.localdomain>
On 11/19/2009 04:59 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> [ Btw, looking at that, why are X86_L1_CACHE_BYTES and X86_L1_CACHE_SHIFT
> totally unrelated numbers? Very confusing. ]
>
Yes, there is another thread to clean up that particular mess; it is
already in -tip:
http://git.kernel.org/tip/350f8f5631922c7848ec4b530c111cb8c2ff7caa
-hpa