This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [Dwarf-Discuss] Does gcc optimization impacts retrieving Dwarf information?

From: "M. Mohan Kumar" <mohan at in dot ibm dot com>
To: Mark Wielaard <mjw at redhat dot com>
Cc: dwarf-discuss at lists dot dwarfstd dot org, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, SHARYATHI NAGESH <sharyathi at in dot ibm dot com>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 19:15:23 +0530
Subject: Re: [Dwarf-Discuss] Does gcc optimization impacts retrieving Dwarf information?
References: <20090528085225.GA4492@in.ibm.com> <4A1E5FF4.7080608@eagercon.com> <20090528144027.GB19495@elastic.org> <4A1EB3F3.7090203@eagercon.com> <20090529085812.GA31047@in.ibm.com> <1243590102.4800.48.camel@hermans.wildebeest.org> <4B03ED3D.6010708@in.ibm.com> <1258628425.5693.7.camel@springer.wildebeest.org>

On 11/19/2009 04:30 PM, Mark Wielaard wrote:

On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 18:19 +0530, M. Mohan Kumar wrote:

Are VTA patches part of mainline gcc now? If not, where could we get the
VTA patches?


The VTA implementation is in mainline gcc now. There are also some
backports to gcc 4.4, like the gcc that Fedora 12 ships with.

Hi Mark,

Thank you very much for the info. Is there any option needs to be passed to gcc to enable this VTA feature?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Dwarf-Discuss] Does gcc optimization impacts retrieving Dwarf information?
  - From: Mark Wielaard

References:
- Re: [Dwarf-Discuss] Does gcc optimization impacts retrieving Dwarf information?
  - From: M. Mohan Kumar
- Re: [Dwarf-Discuss] Does gcc optimization impacts retrieving Dwarf information?
  - From: Mark Wielaard

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]