This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [Dwarf-Discuss] Does gcc optimization impacts retrieving Dwarf information?
- From: Mark Wielaard <mjw at redhat dot com>
- To: "M. Mohan Kumar" <mohan at in dot ibm dot com>
- Cc: dwarf-discuss at lists dot dwarfstd dot org, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, SHARYATHI NAGESH <sharyathi at in dot ibm dot com>
- Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 12:00:25 +0100
- Subject: Re: [Dwarf-Discuss] Does gcc optimization impacts retrieving Dwarf information?
- References: <20090528085225.GA4492@in.ibm.com> <4A1E5FF4.7080608@eagercon.com> <20090528144027.GB19495@elastic.org> <4A1EB3F3.7090203@eagercon.com> <20090529085812.GA31047@in.ibm.com> <1243590102.4800.48.camel@hermans.wildebeest.org> <4B03ED3D.6010708@in.ibm.com>
On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 18:19 +0530, M. Mohan Kumar wrote:
> Are VTA patches part of mainline gcc now? If not, where could we get the
> VTA patches?
The VTA implementation is in mainline gcc now. There are also some
backports to gcc 4.4, like the gcc that Fedora 12 ships with.
Cheers,
Mark