This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: semantic of used_define cpp callback?

From: Basile STARYNKEVITCH <basile at starynkevitch dot net>
To: Arnaud Charlet <charlet at adacore dot com>
Cc: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 18:35:48 +0100
Subject: Re: semantic of used_define cpp callback?
References: <20091115111315.GA77473@adacore.com> <m3k4xryaec.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20091115172506.GA38071@adacore.com>

Arnaud Charlet wrote:

I suppose the idea is to emit each used macro a single time only, the
code seems to confirm this.

Makes sense indeed (and at least matches what the code does).

Arnaud> so would the addition of a new callback (e.g.
Arnaud>   void (*used) (cpp_reader *, unsigned int, cpp_hashnode *);
Arnaud> ) be acceptable in principle? If so, I'll post a formal patch on
Arnaud> gcc-patches@

Yes, this would be fine.

Thanks, I'll prepare such patch then.

May I respectfully suggest to make that a plugin callback?

Regards.

--
Basile STARYNKEVITCH         http://starynkevitch.net/Basile/
email: basile<at>starynkevitch<dot>net mobile: +33 6 8501 2359
8, rue de la Faiencerie, 92340 Bourg La Reine, France
*** opinions {are only mines, sont seulement les miennes} ***

References:
- semantic of used_define cpp callback?
  - From: Arnaud Charlet
- Re: semantic of used_define cpp callback?
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: semantic of used_define cpp callback?
  - From: Arnaud Charlet

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]