This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: is LTO aimed for large programs?

From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at google dot com>
To: Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
Cc: Basile STARYNKEVITCH <basile at starynkevitch dot net>, GCC Mailing List <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 07:52:38 -0500
Subject: Re: is LTO aimed for large programs?
References: <4AF74E2A.2030703@starynkevitch.net> <b798aad50911090435q69b5f28fv961fb1cafab8310f@mail.gmail.com> <84fc9c000911090447jcda0a3bje34fab297ad9fbb5@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 07:47, Richard Guenther
<richard.guenther@gmail.com> wrote:

> So I don't believe you ;) ÂEven with 400 thousand cgraph nodes
> you'd run out of virtual memory on 32bits unless the cgraph
> node size on 32bit is less than 10 bytes which it is of course not ...

You are right.  I was thinking 400k, not 400m.  Sorry about that.

Diego.

References:
- is LTO aimed for large programs?
  - From: Basile STARYNKEVITCH
- Re: is LTO aimed for large programs?
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: is LTO aimed for large programs?
  - From: Richard Guenther

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]