This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: new plugin events
- From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at google dot com>
- To: Basile STARYNKEVITCH <basile at starynkevitch dot net>
- Cc: Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>, Rafael Espindola <espindola at google dot com>, gcc <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Grigori Fursin <grigori dot fursin at inria dot fr>, Joern Rennecke <amylaar at spamcop dot net>, Zbigniew Chamski <zbigniew dot chamski at gmail dot com>
- Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 14:07:56 -0500
- Subject: Re: new plugin events
- References: <4AE72A4F.8000303@starynkevitch.net> <38a0d8450911050824l838fd92ya9f3a08205c80a85@mail.gmail.com> <4AF33453.7090200@starynkevitch.net> <38a0d8450911060724h3c6f9ddh3e84c2c763ac4de0@mail.gmail.com> <b798aad50911060800w5bffaf50tdabbbf2d78be4d22@mail.gmail.com> <84fc9c000911060818s3462aff1r1ebfb298506b6939@mail.gmail.com> <b798aad50911060827r1105ad3fna194ff5b898ce95@mail.gmail.com> <4AF4634D.5050303@starynkevitch.net> <b798aad50911061036g3be83df2n8d8ca5c4144c3c8d@mail.gmail.com> <4AF47257.8040307@starynkevitch.net>
On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 14:00, Basile STARYNKEVITCH
<basile@starynkevitch.net> wrote:
> I really insist that the position "events are only accepted if there exist a
> mature & running plugin needing them" is not sustainable.
No. We are not communicating here. The relative maturity of the
plugin that needs it is not relevant. Just that there is some plugin
that could take advantage of it.
If ICI and/or MELT and/or Dehydra and/or whatever other plugin people
are developing need new plugin events, then by all means lets add
them!
Let's not make a mountain out of a molehill.
Diego.