This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: MPC version 0.8 released!
On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 7:36 PM, Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini@oracle.com> wrote:
> Basile STARYNKEVITCH wrote:
>> On many Linux distributions you could configure /etc/ld.so.conf to add
>> /usr/local/lib (or lib64).
>>
>> I always do that -so no need to have a LD_LIBRARY_PATH- and IIRC some
>> distributions already have that.
> Interesting.
>
> Anyway, besides my immediate needs of building a working compiler
> including all the latest library-supported features, I'm more interested
> in seeing a "pattern" in the way such libraries are configured. For
> example, I can confirm that I have libppl, libcloog, and libelf built
> normally, that is shared versions too, and installed in /usr/local/lib
> and everything works fine (I have also older system libelf, that's why a
> need to pass --with-libelf=/usr/local, nothing else). I'm still a bit
> surprised mpc requires a different treatment (fwiw, gmp and mpfr come
> with the distro and are installed in /usr/lib64)
I guess you have both lto and graphite support disabled. Check by
running ldd on cc1 and lto1.
Richard.
> Paolo.
>
>