This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: MPC version 0.8 released!


Basile STARYNKEVITCH wrote:
> On many Linux distributions you could configure /etc/ld.so.conf to add
> /usr/local/lib (or lib64).
>
> I always do that -so no need to have a LD_LIBRARY_PATH- and IIRC some
> distributions already have that.
Interesting.

Anyway, besides my immediate needs of building a working compiler
including all the latest library-supported features, I'm more interested
in seeing a "pattern" in the way such libraries are configured. For
example, I can confirm that I have libppl, libcloog, and libelf built
normally, that is shared versions too, and installed in /usr/local/lib
and everything works fine (I have also older system libelf, that's why a
need to pass --with-libelf=/usr/local, nothing else). I'm still a bit
surprised mpc requires a different treatment (fwiw, gmp and mpfr come
with the distro and are installed in /usr/lib64)

Paolo.
 


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]