This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Do BLKmode bit-fields still exist?
Hi,
On Fri, 6 Nov 2009, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> Yet it's easy in Ada on platforms with strict alignment, e.g. SPARC:
>
> package P is
>
> type Rec1 is record
> I1 : Integer;
> I2 : Integer;
> I3 : Integer;
> end record;
>
> type R2 is record
> B : Boolean;
> R : Rec1;
> end record;
> pragma Pack (R2);
>
> end P;
>
> (gdb) p debug_tree(0x2aaaaab2bdc0)
> <field_decl 0x2aaaaab2bdc0 r
> type <record_type 0x2aaaaabc64d0 p__rec1 sizes-gimplified visited BLK
> external packed bit-field BLK file p.ads line 11 col 5 size <integer_cst
>
> We set DECL_BIT_FIELD in the front-end because the field is misaligned.
Uahhh! A bitfield of RECORD_TYPE! Marvelous.
Molding this into a testcase that actually writes into some parts, like:
procedure Fields is
type Rec1 is record
I1 : Integer;
end record;
type R2 is record
B : Boolean;
R : Rec1;
end record;
pragma Pack (R2);
r,rr : R2;
subr,subr2 : Rec1;
procedure useme (x:in out R2;y:in out Rec1);
pragma Import (C, useme);
function giveme return Integer;
pragma Import (c,giveme);
begin
subr2.I1 := giveme;
subr := subr2;
r.R := subr2;
rr := r;
useme(rr, subr);
end;
triggers the gcc_unreachable in get_inner_references (on sparc), okay.
But I can't trigger the one in store_field, because the target for these
stores will alway be a non-register due to the unaligned fields in there,
hmm. (the above needs -O1 -fno-tree-ccp -fno-tree-copy-prop -fno-tree-sra
ot not forward the giveme() result but retain the store into r.R).
Ciao,
Michael.