gcc archive
author index for November, 2009

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav:	[Browse other archives for this mailing list] [Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to: This time period only This mailing list only All mailing lists Entire site (no limit)

徐持恒

• 2009-11-09 02:26 How to run gcc test suite in pure mingw32 environment?
• 2009-11-09 07:13 答复: How to run gcc test suite in pure mingw32 environment?
• 2009-11-10 02:37 答复: How to run gcc test suite in pure mingw32 environment?

Rotary espoir en tête

• 2009-11-11 21:22 Invitation avant-premiÃre

Sébastien Bourdeauducq

• 2009-11-09 00:23 Re: Lattice Mico32 port

Andrew Morton

• 2009-11-04 06:24 Re: cc1plus invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x280da, order=0, oom_adj=0
• 2009-11-04 15:29 Re: cc1plus invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x280da, order=0, oom_adj=0

Andrew Pinski

• 2009-11-03 21:15 Re: How to debug lto1 ICE?
• 2009-11-04 21:30 Re: Whole program optimization and functions-only-called-once.
• 2009-11-10 16:36 Re: help on - adding a new pass to gcc

Aravinda

• 2009-11-01 22:37 Re: undefined reference to `gt_pch_nx_tree_code'
• 2009-11-02 22:34 Re: undefined reference to `gt_pch_nx_tree_code'

Basile STARYNKEVITCH

• 2009-11-02 21:42 Re: Process for proposing new C/C++ language extensions.
• 2009-11-03 20:57 How to debug lto1 ICE?
• 2009-11-06 15:04 very different compilation times [no optimisation]
• 2009-11-06 15:36 Re: very different compilation times [no optimisation]
• 2009-11-06 15:43 Re: very different compilation times [no optimisation]
• 2009-11-06 15:54 Re: [plugins-ici-cloning-instrumentation] new GCC plugin developements
• 2009-11-06 16:37 Re: very different compilation times [no optimisation]
• 2009-11-06 16:48 Re: very different compilation times [no optimisation]
• 2009-11-06 16:59 Re: [plugins-ici-cloning-instrumentation] new GCC plugin developements
• 2009-11-06 18:16 Re: MPC version 0.8 released!
• 2009-11-06 19:01 new plugin events
• 2009-11-06 19:28 Re: new plugin events
• 2009-11-06 21:41 Re: new plugin events
• 2009-11-07 10:50 Re: new plugin events
• 2009-11-07 11:50 Re: new plugin events
• 2009-11-07 14:44 Re: new plugin events
• 2009-11-08 21:45 Re: [Re: new plugin events]
• 2009-11-08 23:03 is LTO aimed for large programs?
• 2009-11-09 06:43 Re: is LTO aimed for large programs?
• 2009-11-10 12:19 Re: How to avoid a tree node being garbage collected after C frontend?
• 2009-11-10 16:45 Re: help on - adding a new pass to gcc
• 2009-11-11 19:26 Re: gccgo: A gcc frontend for Go, a new programming language
• 2009-11-11 21:12 Re: gccgo: A gcc frontend for Go, a new programming language
• 2009-11-11 21:18 Re: gccgo: A gcc frontend for Go, a new programming language
• 2009-11-11 22:24 Re: gccgo: A gcc frontend for Go, a new programming language

Bingfeng Mei

• 2009-11-09 17:05 How to avoid a tree node being garbage collected after C frontend?
• 2009-11-10 11:01 RE: How to avoid a tree node being garbage collected after C frontend?
• 2009-11-10 13:21 RE: How to avoid a tree node being garbage collected after C frontend?
• 2009-11-10 15:59 Is this patch of vector shift in 4.5?
• 2009-11-10 16:37 RE: help on - adding a new pass to gcc

Byoungyoung Lee

• 2009-11-07 09:38 How to do executable individualization using optimization options ?
• 2009-11-07 13:22 How to do executable individualization using optimization options ?
• 2009-11-09 03:01 Re: How to do executable individualization using optimization options ?

Chris Lattner

• 2009-11-11 20:54 Re: gccgo: A gcc frontend for Go, a new programming language

Dave Hudson

• 2009-11-06 12:53 RE: Understanding IRA
• 2009-11-10 12:19 RE: Understanding IRA

Dave Korn

• 2009-11-04 12:58 Re: cc1plus invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x280da, order=0, oom_adj=0
• 2009-11-04 14:12 Re: How to support 40bit GP register
• 2009-11-04 15:30 Re: cc1plus invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x280da, order=0, oom_adj=0
• 2009-11-04 19:33 Re: cc1plus invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x280da, order=0, oom_adj=0
• 2009-11-05 00:21 Re: cc1plus invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x280da, order=0, oom_adj=0
• 2009-11-05 04:53 Re: cc1plus invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x280da, order=0, oom_adj=0
• 2009-11-06 15:12 Re: New g++ template stress/regression test?
• 2009-11-06 15:16 Re: very different compilation times [no optimisation]
• 2009-11-06 15:49 Re: very different compilation times [no optimisation]
• 2009-11-07 22:06 Re: MPC version 0.8 released!
• 2009-11-09 06:38 Re: How to run gcc test suite in pure mingw32 environment?
• 2009-11-09 14:28 Re: 答复: How to run gcc test suite in pu re mingw32 environment?

David Edelsohn

• 2009-11-03 16:52 Re: Lattice Mico32 port
• 2009-11-08 02:01 Re: MPC 0.8 prerelease tarball (last release before MPC is mandatory!)
• 2009-11-08 21:29 Re: MPC 0.8 prerelease tarball (last release before MPC is mandatory!)
• 2009-11-10 16:13 Re: MPC 0.8 prerelease tarball (last release before MPC is mandatory!)
• 2009-11-11 00:22 Re: MPC 0.8 prerelease tarball (last release before MPC is mandatory!)

ddmetro

• 2009-11-03 17:25 help on - instruction scheduling passes in gcc
• 2009-11-03 17:25 help on - instruction scheduling passes in gcc
• 2009-11-03 17:27 help on - instruction scheduling passes in gcc
• 2009-11-03 17:33 help on - instruction scheduling passes in gcc
• 2009-11-03 17:33 help on - instruction scheduling passes in gcc
• 2009-11-03 17:33 help on - instruction scheduling passes in gcc
• 2009-11-10 16:25 help on - adding a new pass to gcc

Denis Onischenko

• 2009-11-02 20:20 incorrect place for LTO options description

Dennis Clarke

• 2009-11-05 17:22 Re: MPC version 0.8 released!
• 2009-11-05 18:16 Re: MPC version 0.8 released!
• 2009-11-09 15:46 Re: Updating Primary and Secondary platform list for gcc-4.5 ???
• 2009-11-09 16:50 Re: Updating Primary and Secondary platform list for gcc-4.5 ???

Diego Novillo

• 2009-11-06 19:08 Re: new plugin events
• 2009-11-09 12:35 Re: is LTO aimed for large programs?
• 2009-11-09 12:52 Re: is LTO aimed for large programs?

Eric Botcazou

• 2009-11-05 20:59 Re: MPC version 0.8 released!
• 2009-11-06 09:47 Re: Do BLKmode bit-fields still exist?
• 2009-11-06 11:29 Re: Do BLKmode bit-fields still exist?
• 2009-11-06 17:28 Re: MPC version 0.8 released!
• 2009-11-06 17:44 Re: MPC version 0.8 released!
• 2009-11-07 17:39 Re: Updating Primary and Secondary platform list for gcc-4.5 ???
• 2009-11-09 07:13 Re: is LTO aimed for large programs?

Frank Ch. Eigler

• 2009-11-11 18:14 Re: gccgo: A gcc frontend for Go, a new programming language

gccadmin

• 2009-11-01 22:50 gcc-4.3-20091101 is now available
• 2009-11-03 22:50 gcc-4.4-20091103 is now available
• 2009-11-05 22:50 gcc-4.5-20091105 is now available
• 2009-11-08 22:47 gcc-4.3-20091108 is now available
• 2009-11-10 22:49 gcc-4.4-20091110 is now available

Gerald Pfeifer

• 2009-11-01 17:54 Re: MPC 0.8 prerelease tarball (last release before MPC is mandatory!)
• 2009-11-01 23:41 Three old entries from PROBLEMS
• 2009-11-07 19:38 Re: MPC version 0.8 released!
• 2009-11-07 20:02 Re: Updating Primary and Secondary platform list for gcc-4.5 ???
• 2009-11-08 02:33 Re: MPC version 0.8 released!
• 2009-11-08 21:13 Re: [Re: new plugin events]
• 2009-11-08 21:57 Re: [Re: new plugin events]

Grigori Fursin

• 2009-11-02 20:20 RE: plugin hooks
• 2009-11-05 11:17 [plugins-ici-cloning-instrumentation] new GCC plugin developements
• 2009-11-05 13:54 RE: [plugins-ici-cloning-instrumentation] new GCC plugin developements
• 2009-11-05 16:27 RE: [plugins-ici-cloning-instrumentation] new GCC plugin developements
• 2009-11-06 14:09 RE: [plugins-ici-cloning-instrumentation] new GCC plugin developements
• 2009-11-06 15:09 RE: [plugins-ici-cloning-instrumentation] new GCC plugin developements
• 2009-11-06 15:46 RE: [plugins-ici-cloning-instrumentation] new GCC plugin developements
• 2009-11-06 16:12 RE: [plugins-ici-cloning-instrumentation] new GCC plugin developements
• 2009-11-06 17:09 RE: [plugins-ici-cloning-instrumentation] new GCC plugin developements
• 2009-11-06 18:18 RE: [plugins-ici-cloning-instrumentation] new GCC plugin developements
• 2009-11-06 18:44 RE: [plugins-ici-cloning-instrumentation] new GCC plugin developements
• 2009-11-07 12:25 RE: new plugin events
• 2009-11-07 14:28 RE: new plugin events
• 2009-11-07 15:27 RE: new plugin events
• 2009-11-09 14:28 RE: [plugins-ici-cloning-instrumentation] new GCC plugin developements
• 2009-11-09 14:46 RE: [plugins-ici-cloning-instrumentation] new GCC plugin developements
• 2009-11-09 21:19 RE: [plugins-ici-cloning-instrumentation] new GCC plugin developements
• 2009-11-10 21:17 RE: [plugins-ici-cloning-instrumentation] new GCC plugin developements

H. Peter Anvin

• 2009-11-06 02:09 Re: Storing 16bit values in upper part of 32bit registers

H.J. Lu

• 2009-11-02 22:06 PATCH: Support --enable-gold=both --with-linker=[bfd|gold]
• 2009-11-03 22:19 Re: PATCH: Support --enable-gold=both --with-linker=[bfd|gold]
• 2009-11-03 23:28 Re: PATCH: Support --enable-gold=both --with-linker=[bfd|gold]
• 2009-11-04 14:47 Re: PATCH: Support --enable-gold=both --with-linker=[bfd|gold]
• 2009-11-11 17:41 The Linux binutils 2.20.51.0.3 is released

Hadja Zanab Diallo

• 2009-11-05 04:31 Bonjour Monsieur

Ian Bolton

• 2009-11-03 16:29 RE: Understanding IRA
• 2009-11-04 17:52 RE: Understanding IRA
• 2009-11-05 17:36 RE: Understanding IRA
• 2009-11-05 18:05 RE: Understanding IRA
• 2009-11-09 14:13 RE: Understanding IRA
• 2009-11-10 17:38 RE: Understanding IRA
• 2009-11-11 15:19 RE: Understanding IRA
• 2009-11-11 18:36 RE: Understanding IRA
• 2009-11-11 20:09 RE: Understanding IRA

Ian Lance Taylor

• 2009-11-03 18:00 Re: help on - instruction scheduling passes in gcc
• 2009-11-03 22:04 Re: Preserving the argument spills for GDB
• 2009-11-04 16:45 Re: Preserving the argument spills for GDB
• 2009-11-05 23:34 Re: [plugins-ici-cloning-instrumentation] new GCC plugin developements
• 2009-11-06 15:34 Re: How to write shift and add pattern?
• 2009-11-06 15:35 Re: very different compilation times [no optimisation]
• 2009-11-06 16:00 Re: very different compilation times [no optimisation]
• 2009-11-06 19:24 Re: MPC version 0.8 released!
• 2009-11-07 19:36 Re: How to do executable individualization using optimization options ?
• 2009-11-08 18:40 Re: link list & thread
• 2009-11-09 15:26 Re: How to write shift and add pattern?
• 2009-11-09 15:40 Re: Preserving the argument spills for GDB
• 2009-11-09 15:57 Re: i370 port
• 2009-11-09 19:00 Re: How to avoid a tree node being garbage collected after C frontend?
• 2009-11-10 06:12 Re: pure64 patch for 4.5.0
• 2009-11-10 15:36 Re: i370 port
• 2009-11-10 15:56 Re: i370 port
• 2009-11-10 23:21 gccgo: A gcc frontend for Go, a new programming language
• 2009-11-11 01:39 License of gccgo frontend
• 2009-11-11 21:09 Re: gccgo: A gcc frontend for Go, a new programming language
• 2009-11-11 23:16 Re: gccgo: A gcc frontend for Go, a new programming language

info

• 2009-11-02 18:01 RE; BAD WEATHER IS COMING... How will you reach your people?
• 2009-11-02 20:23 RE; BAD WEATHER IS COMING... How will you reach your people?

Janus Weil

• 2009-11-08 10:43 Re: MPC version 0.8 released!

Jason Merrill

• 2009-11-01 05:02 Re: enable-build-with-cxx bootstrap compare broken by r149964

Jean Christophe Beyler

• 2009-11-03 19:01 Preserving the argument spills for GDB
• 2009-11-03 21:09 Re: Preserving the argument spills for GDB
• 2009-11-04 16:24 Re: Preserving the argument spills for GDB
• 2009-11-09 15:22 Re: Preserving the argument spills for GDB
• 2009-11-09 17:15 Re: Preserving the argument spills for GDB

Jeff Law

• 2009-11-03 23:02 Re: Understanding IRA
• 2009-11-04 14:41 Re: IRA is not looking into the predicates ?
• 2009-11-04 19:49 Re: Understanding IRA
• 2009-11-05 00:23 Re: Understanding IRA
• 2009-11-05 17:42 Re: Do BLKmode bit-fields still exist?
• 2009-11-10 17:21 Re: Understanding IRA
• 2009-11-10 23:06 Fwd: Re: Understanding IRA
• 2009-11-11 16:12 Re: Understanding IRA

Jiri Slaby

• 2009-11-02 21:49 Re: cc1plus invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x280da, order=0, oom_adj=0
• 2009-11-02 22:05 Re: cc1plus invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x280da, order=0, oom_adj=0
• 2009-11-04 09:14 Re: cc1plus invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x280da, order=0, oom_adj=0

Joe Buck

• 2009-11-11 20:43 Re: gccgo: A gcc frontend for Go, a new programming language

Joern Rennecke

• 2009-11-02 07:46 Re: Three old entries from PROBLEMS
• 2009-11-02 07:57 Re: Three old entries from PROBLEMS
• 2009-11-02 12:47 RE: plugin hooks
• 2009-11-05 13:26 Re: [plugins-ici-cloning-instrumentation] new GCC plugin developements
• 2009-11-06 14:54 RE: [plugins-ici-cloning-instrumentation] new GCC plugin developements
• 2009-11-06 15:28 RE: [plugins-ici-cloning-instrumentation] new GCC plugin developements
• 2009-11-06 17:14 Re: [plugins-ici-cloning-instrumentation] new GCC plugin developements
• 2009-11-06 18:30 RE: [plugins-ici-cloning-instrumentation] new GCC plugin developements
• 2009-11-08 20:47 Re: [Re: new plugin events]
• 2009-11-08 21:44 Re: [Re: new plugin events]
• 2009-11-09 01:43 RE: [plugins-ici-cloning-instrumentation] new GCC plugin developements
• 2009-11-09 18:15 RE: [plugins-ici-cloning-instrumentation] new GCC plugin developements
• 2009-11-10 05:16 RE: [plugins-ici-cloning-instrumentation] new GCC plugin developements

John David Anglin

• 2009-11-01 00:17 Re: MPC 0.8 prerelease tarball (last release before MPC is mandatory!)
• 2009-11-09 02:49 Re: MPC version 0.8 released!

johnchristian

• 2009-11-02 21:28 Process for proposing new C/C++ language extensions.

Joseph S. Myers

• 2009-11-06 23:25 Re: MPC version 0.8 released!
• 2009-11-06 23:37 Re: new plugin events
• 2009-11-11 20:20 Re: gccgo: A gcc frontend for Go, a new programming language
• 2009-11-11 21:49 Re: gccgo: A gcc frontend for Go, a new programming language

Justin Mattock

• 2009-11-02 21:29 cc1plus invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x280da, order=0, oom_adj=0
• 2009-11-02 22:02 Re: cc1plus invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x280da, order=0, oom_adj=0
• 2009-11-04 16:40 Re: cc1plus invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x280da, order=0, oom_adj=0
• 2009-11-04 21:22 Re: cc1plus invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x280da, order=0, oom_adj=0
• 2009-11-05 03:36 Re: cc1plus invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x280da, order=0, oom_adj=0

Justin P. Mattock

• 2009-11-02 22:12 Re: cc1plus invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x280da, order=0, oom_adj=0
• 2009-11-03 00:56 Re: cc1plus invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x280da, order=0, oom_adj=0
• 2009-11-04 01:40 Re: cc1plus invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x280da, order=0, oom_adj=0
• 2009-11-04 06:44 Re: cc1plus invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x280da, order=0, oom_adj=0
• 2009-11-04 15:08 Re: cc1plus invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x280da, order=0, oom_adj=0
• 2009-11-04 20:39 Re: cc1plus invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x280da, order=0, oom_adj=0
• 2009-11-06 21:21 Re: cc1plus invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x280da, order=0, oom_adj=0
• 2009-11-10 02:09 pure64 patch for 4.5.0
• 2009-11-10 02:55 Re: cc1plus invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x280da, order=0, oom_adj=0
• 2009-11-10 06:18 Re: pure64 patch for 4.5.0

Kai Ruottu

• 2009-11-09 10:52 Re: How to run gcc test suite in pure mingw32 environment?

Kai Tietz

• 2009-11-09 06:43 Re: How to run gcc test suite in pure mingw32 environment?
• 2009-11-09 07:50 Re: 答复: How to run gcc test suite in pure mingw3 2 environment?
• 2009-11-09 11:04 Re: How to run gcc test suite in pure mingw32 environment?

Kaveh R. Ghazi

• 2009-11-02 03:06 Re: MPC 0.8 prerelease tarball (last release before MPC is mandatory!)
• 2009-11-05 15:54 MPC version 0.8 released!
• 2009-11-05 19:06 Re: MPC version 0.8 released!
• 2009-11-06 21:58 Re: MPC version 0.8 released!
• 2009-11-07 16:56 Updating Primary and Secondary platform list for gcc-4.5 ???
• 2009-11-07 17:39 Re: MPC version 0.8 released!
• 2009-11-08 06:22 Re: MPC 0.8 prerelease tarball (last release before MPC is mandatory!)
• 2009-11-09 05:33 Re: MPC 0.8 prerelease tarball (last release before MPC is mandatory!)
• 2009-11-09 05:38 Re: MPC 0.8 prerelease tarball (last release before MPC is mandatory!)
• 2009-11-10 06:16 Re: MPC 0.8 prerelease tarball (last release before MPC is mandatory!)
• 2009-11-10 16:50 Re: MPC 0.8 prerelease tarball (last release before MPC is mandatory!)

Kaz Kojima

• 2009-11-01 21:57 Re: MPC 0.8 prerelease tarball (last release before MPC is mandatory!)
• 2009-11-08 22:57 Re: MPC version 0.8 released!

KOSAKI Motohiro

• 2009-11-04 01:18 Re: cc1plus invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x280da, order=0, oom_adj=0
• 2009-11-04 09:32 Re: cc1plus invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x280da, order=0, oom_adj=0
• 2009-11-04 23:20 Re: cc1plus invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x280da, order=0, oom_adj=0

Larry Evans

• 2009-11-03 03:39 [c++]pt.c:most_specialized_class appears to substitute outer args for inner params
• 2009-11-08 23:09 howto graphically view .cfg file produced by -fdump-tree-cfg
• 2009-11-11 14:32 Re: [c++]pt.c:most_specialized_class appears to substitute outer args for inner params

Laurynas Biveinis

• 2009-11-01 20:28 Re: undefined reference to `gt_pch_nx_tree_code'
• 2009-11-01 22:45 Re: undefined reference to `gt_pch_nx_tree_code'

Mark Cave-Ayland

• 2009-11-11 16:30 Strange optimisation problem - gcc 4.3.2

Mark Mitchell

• 2009-11-10 17:03 Re: Updating Primary and Secondary platform list for gcc-4.5 ???

Markus L

• 2009-11-06 14:29 Re: Storing 16bit values in upper part of 32bit registers

Michael Eager

• 2009-11-04 20:56 MicroBlaze update

Michael Matz

• 2009-11-05 17:03 Do BLKmode bit-fields still exist?
• 2009-11-06 16:24 Re: Do BLKmode bit-fields still exist?

Mikael Pettersson

• 2009-11-05 20:29 Re: MPC version 0.8 released!

Mohamed Shafi

• 2009-11-04 13:35 Re: How to support 40bit GP register
• 2009-11-04 13:42 Re: IRA is not looking into the predicates ?
• 2009-11-04 13:43 Re: IRA is not looking into the predicates ?
• 2009-11-06 13:30 Re: How to write shift and add pattern?
• 2009-11-09 12:49 Re: How to write shift and add pattern?
• 2009-11-09 12:53 Re: How to write shift and add pattern?
• 2009-11-09 14:14 Re: How to support 40bit GP register
• 2009-11-10 13:48 How to split mulsi3 pattern

Mohsen Pahlevanzadeh

• 2009-11-08 09:35 link list & thread

Nathan Froyd

• 2009-11-04 16:34 Re: Preserving the argument spills for GDB

Paolo Bonzini

• 2009-11-02 00:04 Re: Three old entries from PROBLEMS
• 2009-11-02 10:07 Re: Three old entries from PROBLEMS
• 2009-11-09 01:14 Re: MPC 0.8 prerelease tarball (last release before MPC is mandatory!)
• 2009-11-09 09:21 Re: MPC 0.8 prerelease tarball (last release before MPC is mandatory!)

Paolo Carlini

• 2009-11-06 17:13 Re: MPC version 0.8 released!
• 2009-11-06 17:21 Re: MPC version 0.8 released!
• 2009-11-06 17:38 Re: MPC version 0.8 released!
• 2009-11-06 17:53 Re: MPC version 0.8 released!
• 2009-11-06 18:37 Re: MPC version 0.8 released!
• 2009-11-06 19:01 Re: MPC version 0.8 released!
• 2009-11-06 19:04 Re: MPC version 0.8 released!
• 2009-11-06 19:07 Re: MPC version 0.8 released!
• 2009-11-06 19:33 Re: MPC version 0.8 released!

Paul Edwards

• 2009-11-02 14:45 Re: i370 port - constructing compile script
• 2009-11-04 05:21 Re: i370 port
• 2009-11-09 14:55 Re: i370 port
• 2009-11-09 23:10 Re: i370 port
• 2009-11-10 14:58 Re: i370 port
• 2009-11-10 15:51 Re: i370 port

Rafael Espindola

• 2009-11-03 21:12 Re: How to debug lto1 ICE?

Rahul Kharche

• 2009-11-02 14:59 RE: RFC PRE-ing REFERENCE expressions

Rainer Emrich

• 2009-11-11 16:44 native x86_64-w64-mingw32 fails to boostrap
• 2009-11-11 16:47 Re: libtool update?

Rainer Orth

• 2009-11-04 18:17 Mercurial mirror of mainline not updated anymore?
• 2009-11-05 17:20 Re: MPC version 0.8 released!
• 2009-11-05 17:53 Re: MPC version 0.8 released!
• 2009-11-09 15:34 Re: Updating Primary and Secondary platform list for gcc-4.5 ???
• 2009-11-09 16:17 Re: Updating Primary and Secondary platform list for gcc-4.5 ???

Ralf Wildenhues

• 2009-11-11 20:07 Re: libtool update?

Richard Guenther

• 2009-11-02 15:01 RE: RFC PRE-ing REFERENCE expressions
• 2009-11-04 19:26 Re: Whole program optimization and functions-only-called-once.
• 2009-11-04 21:50 Re: Whole program optimization and functions-only-called-once.
• 2009-11-06 09:54 Re: Do BLKmode bit-fields still exist?
• 2009-11-06 17:16 Re: MPC version 0.8 released!
• 2009-11-06 18:51 Re: MPC version 0.8 released!
• 2009-11-06 19:05 Re: MPC version 0.8 released!
• 2009-11-06 19:52 Re: new plugin events
• 2009-11-06 22:23 Re: new plugin events
• 2009-11-06 22:45 Re: new plugin events
• 2009-11-07 14:06 Re: new plugin events
• 2009-11-08 17:42 Re: [Re: new plugin events]
• 2009-11-08 21:03 Re: [Re: new plugin events]
• 2009-11-08 21:07 Re: [Re: new plugin events]
• 2009-11-08 21:40 Re: [Re: new plugin events]
• 2009-11-09 09:57 Re: is LTO aimed for large programs?
• 2009-11-09 12:48 Re: is LTO aimed for large programs?
• 2009-11-09 16:59 Re: Updating Primary and Secondary platform list for gcc-4.5 ???

Richard Henderson

• 2009-11-02 17:37 Re: Three old entries from PROBLEMS
• 2009-11-02 17:48 Re: Three old entries from PROBLEMS
• 2009-11-04 16:39 Re: How to support 40bit GP register
• 2009-11-06 16:17 Re: How to write shift and add pattern?
• 2009-11-09 16:16 Re: How to support 40bit GP register
• 2009-11-10 17:37 Re: How to split mulsi3 pattern

Robert Dewar

• 2009-11-08 23:31 Re: is LTO aimed for large programs?

Roland McGrath

• 2009-11-03 22:23 Re: PATCH: Support --enable-gold=both --with-linker=[bfd|gold]
• 2009-11-04 05:09 Re: PATCH: Support --enable-gold=both --with-linker=[bfd|gold]

Sebastian Mach

• 2009-11-06 10:14 New g++ template stress/regression test?
• 2009-11-06 16:56 Re: New g++ template stress/regression test?

Steven Bosscher

• 2009-11-07 11:01 Re: new plugin events

Taro Okumichi

• 2009-11-11 19:29 Creating a function dynamically
• 2009-11-12 08:25 Re: Creating a function dynamically

Terrence Miller

• 2009-11-08 17:35 [Re: new plugin events]
• 2009-11-08 18:10 Re: [Re: new plugin events]

Tobias Burnus

• 2009-11-09 09:44 Re: is LTO aimed for large programs?

Toon Moene

• 2009-11-04 19:19 Whole program optimization and functions-only-called-once.
• 2009-11-04 21:20 Re: Whole program optimization and functions-only-called-once.

Ulrich Weigand

• 2009-11-04 16:47 Re: i370 port

Vladimir Makarov

• 2009-11-04 17:13 Re: Understanding IRA
• 2009-11-11 17:04 Re: Understanding IRA

Weddington, Eric

• 2009-11-08 04:40 RE: MPC version 0.8 released!

Yuanjie Huang

• 2009-11-05 14:34 Re: [plugins-ici-cloning-instrumentation] new GCC plugin developements
• 2009-11-06 05:18 Re: [plugins-ici-cloning-instrumentation] new GCC plugin developements

Indexes:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav:	[Browse other archives for this mailing list] [Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to: This time period only This mailing list only All mailing lists Entire site (no limit)