gcc archive
date index for November, 2009

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

November 08, 2009
06:22 Re: MPC 0.8 prerelease tarball (last release before MPC is mandatory!) Kaveh R. Ghazi
04:40 RE: MPC version 0.8 released! Weddington, Eric
02:33 Re: MPC version 0.8 released! Gerald Pfeifer
02:01 Re: MPC 0.8 prerelease tarball (last release before MPC is mandatory!) David Edelsohn

November 07, 2009
22:06 Re: MPC version 0.8 released! Dave Korn
20:02 Re: Updating Primary and Secondary platform list for gcc-4.5 ??? Gerald Pfeifer
19:38 Re: MPC version 0.8 released! Gerald Pfeifer
19:36 Re: How to do executable individualization using optimization options ? Ian Lance Taylor
17:39 Re: MPC version 0.8 released! Kaveh R. Ghazi
17:39 Re: Updating Primary and Secondary platform list for gcc-4.5 ??? Eric Botcazou
16:56 Updating Primary and Secondary platform list for gcc-4.5 ??? Kaveh R. GHAZI
15:27 RE: new plugin events Grigori Fursin
14:44 Re: new plugin events Basile STARYNKEVITCH
14:28 RE: new plugin events Grigori Fursin
14:06 Re: new plugin events Richard Guenther
13:22 How to do executable individualization using optimization options ? Byoungyoung Lee
12:25 RE: new plugin events Grigori Fursin
11:50 Re: new plugin events Basile STARYNKEVITCH
11:01 Re: new plugin events Steven Bosscher
10:50 Re: new plugin events Basile STARYNKEVITCH
09:38 How to do executable individualization using optimization options ? Byoungyoung Lee

November 06, 2009
23:37 Re: new plugin events Joseph S. Myers
23:25 Re: MPC version 0.8 released! Joseph S. Myers
22:45 Re: new plugin events Richard Guenther
22:23 Re: new plugin events Richard Guenther
21:58 Re: MPC version 0.8 released! Kaveh R. Ghazi
21:41 Re: new plugin events Basile STARYNKEVITCH
21:21 Re: cc1plus invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x280da, order=0, oom_adj=0 Justin P. Mattock
19:52 Re: new plugin events Richard Guenther
19:33 Re: MPC version 0.8 released! Paolo Carlini
19:28 Re: new plugin events Basile STARYNKEVITCH
19:24 Re: MPC version 0.8 released! Ian Lance Taylor
19:08 Re: new plugin events Diego Novillo
19:07 Re: MPC version 0.8 released! Paolo Carlini
19:05 Re: MPC version 0.8 released! Richard Guenther
19:04 Re: MPC version 0.8 released! Paolo Carlini
19:01 Re: MPC version 0.8 released! Paolo Carlini
19:01 new plugin events Basile STARYNKEVITCH
18:51 Re: MPC version 0.8 released! Richard Guenther
18:44 RE: [plugins-ici-cloning-instrumentation] new GCC plugin developements Grigori Fursin
18:37 Re: MPC version 0.8 released! Paolo Carlini
18:30 RE: [plugins-ici-cloning-instrumentation] new GCC plugin developements Joern Rennecke
18:18 RE: [plugins-ici-cloning-instrumentation] new GCC plugin developements Grigori Fursin
18:16 Re: MPC version 0.8 released! Basile STARYNKEVITCH
17:53 Re: MPC version 0.8 released! Paolo Carlini
17:44 Re: MPC version 0.8 released! Eric Botcazou
17:38 Re: MPC version 0.8 released! Paolo Carlini
17:28 Re: MPC version 0.8 released! Eric Botcazou
17:21 Re: MPC version 0.8 released! Paolo Carlini
17:16 Re: MPC version 0.8 released! Richard Guenther
17:14 Re: [plugins-ici-cloning-instrumentation] new GCC plugin developements Joern Rennecke
17:13 Re: MPC version 0.8 released! Paolo Carlini
17:09 RE: [plugins-ici-cloning-instrumentation] new GCC plugin developements Grigori Fursin
16:59 Re: [plugins-ici-cloning-instrumentation] new GCC plugin developements Basile STARYNKEVITCH
16:56 Re: New g++ template stress/regression test? Sebastian Mach
16:48 Re: very different compilation times [no optimisation] Basile STARYNKEVITCH
16:37 Re: very different compilation times [no optimisation] Basile STARYNKEVITCH
16:24 Re: Do BLKmode bit-fields still exist? Michael Matz
16:17 Re: How to write shift and add pattern? Richard Henderson
16:12 RE: [plugins-ici-cloning-instrumentation] new GCC plugin developements Grigori Fursin
16:00 Re: very different compilation times [no optimisation] Ian Lance Taylor
15:54 Re: [plugins-ici-cloning-instrumentation] new GCC plugin developements Basile STARYNKEVITCH
15:49 Re: very different compilation times [no optimisation] Dave Korn
15:46 RE: [plugins-ici-cloning-instrumentation] new GCC plugin developements Grigori Fursin
15:43 Re: very different compilation times [no optimisation] Basile STARYNKEVITCH
15:36 Re: very different compilation times [no optimisation] Basile STARYNKEVITCH
15:35 Re: very different compilation times [no optimisation] Ian Lance Taylor
15:34 Re: How to write shift and add pattern? Ian Lance Taylor
15:28 RE: [plugins-ici-cloning-instrumentation] new GCC plugin developements Joern Rennecke
15:16 Re: very different compilation times [no optimisation] Dave Korn
15:12 Re: New g++ template stress/regression test? Dave Korn
15:09 RE: [plugins-ici-cloning-instrumentation] new GCC plugin developements Grigori Fursin
15:04 very different compilation times [no optimisation] Basile STARYNKEVITCH
14:54 RE: [plugins-ici-cloning-instrumentation] new GCC plugin developements Joern Rennecke
14:29 Re: Storing 16bit values in upper part of 32bit registers Markus L
14:09 RE: [plugins-ici-cloning-instrumentation] new GCC plugin developements Grigori Fursin
13:30 Re: How to write shift and add pattern? Mohamed Shafi
12:53 RE: Understanding IRA Dave Hudson
11:29 Re: Do BLKmode bit-fields still exist? Eric Botcazou
10:14 New g++ template stress/regression test? Sebastian Mach
09:54 Re: Do BLKmode bit-fields still exist? Richard Guenther
09:47 Re: Do BLKmode bit-fields still exist? Eric Botcazou
05:18 Re: [plugins-ici-cloning-instrumentation] new GCC plugin developements Yuanjie HUANG
02:09 Re: Storing 16bit values in upper part of 32bit registers H. Peter Anvin

November 05, 2009
23:34 Re: [plugins-ici-cloning-instrumentation] new GCC plugin developements Ian Lance Taylor
22:50 gcc-4.5-20091105 is now available gccadmin
20:59 Re: MPC version 0.8 released! Eric Botcazou
20:29 Re: MPC version 0.8 released! Mikael Pettersson
19:06 Re: MPC version 0.8 released! Kaveh R. Ghazi
18:16 Re: MPC version 0.8 released! Dennis Clarke
18:05 RE: Understanding IRA Ian Bolton
17:53 Re: MPC version 0.8 released! Rainer Orth
17:42 Re: Do BLKmode bit-fields still exist? Jeff Law
17:36 RE: Understanding IRA Ian Bolton
17:22 Re: MPC version 0.8 released! Dennis Clarke
17:20 Re: MPC version 0.8 released! Rainer Orth
17:03 Do BLKmode bit-fields still exist? Michael Matz
16:27 RE: [plugins-ici-cloning-instrumentation] new GCC plugin developements Grigori Fursin
15:54 MPC version 0.8 released! Kaveh R. GHAZI
14:34 Re: [plugins-ici-cloning-instrumentation] new GCC plugin developements Yuanjie Huang
13:54 RE: [plugins-ici-cloning-instrumentation] new GCC plugin developements Grigori Fursin
13:26 Re: [plugins-ici-cloning-instrumentation] new GCC plugin developements Joern Rennecke
11:17 [plugins-ici-cloning-instrumentation] new GCC plugin developements Grigori Fursin
04:53 Re: cc1plus invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x280da, order=0, oom_adj=0 Dave Korn
04:31 Bonjour Monsieur Hadja Zanab Diallo
03:36 Re: cc1plus invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x280da, order=0, oom_adj=0 Justin Mattock
00:23 Re: Understanding IRA Jeff Law
00:21 Re: cc1plus invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x280da, order=0, oom_adj=0 Dave Korn

November 04, 2009
23:20 Re: cc1plus invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x280da, order=0, oom_adj=0 KOSAKI Motohiro
21:50 Re: Whole program optimization and functions-only-called-once. Richard Guenther
21:30 Re: Whole program optimization and functions-only-called-once. Andrew Pinski
21:22 Re: cc1plus invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x280da, order=0, oom_adj=0 Justin Mattock
21:20 Re: Whole program optimization and functions-only-called-once. Toon Moene
20:56 MicroBlaze update Michael Eager
20:39 Re: cc1plus invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x280da, order=0, oom_adj=0 Justin P. Mattock
19:49 Re: Understanding IRA Jeff Law
19:33 Re: cc1plus invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x280da, order=0, oom_adj=0 Dave Korn
19:26 Re: Whole program optimization and functions-only-called-once. Richard Guenther
19:19 Whole program optimization and functions-only-called-once. Toon Moene
18:17 Mercurial mirror of mainline not updated anymore? Rainer Orth
17:52 RE: Understanding IRA Ian Bolton
17:13 Re: Understanding IRA Vladimir Makarov
16:47 Re: i370 port Ulrich Weigand
16:45 Re: Preserving the argument spills for GDB Ian Lance Taylor
16:40 Re: cc1plus invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x280da, order=0, oom_adj=0 Justin Mattock
16:39 Re: How to support 40bit GP register Richard Henderson
16:34 Re: Preserving the argument spills for GDB Nathan Froyd
16:24 Re: Preserving the argument spills for GDB Jean Christophe Beyler
15:30 Re: cc1plus invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x280da, order=0, oom_adj=0 Dave Korn
15:29 Re: cc1plus invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x280da, order=0, oom_adj=0 Andrew Morton
15:08 Re: cc1plus invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x280da, order=0, oom_adj=0 Justin P. Mattock
14:47 Re: PATCH: Support --enable-gold=both --with-linker=[bfd|gold] H.J. Lu
14:41 Re: IRA is not looking into the predicates ? Jeff Law
14:12 Re: How to support 40bit GP register Dave Korn
13:43 Re: IRA is not looking into the predicates ? Mohamed Shafi
13:42 Re: IRA is not looking into the predicates ? Mohamed Shafi
13:35 Re: How to support 40bit GP register Mohamed Shafi
12:58 Re: cc1plus invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x280da, order=0, oom_adj=0 Dave Korn
09:32 Re: cc1plus invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x280da, order=0, oom_adj=0 KOSAKI Motohiro
09:14 Re: cc1plus invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x280da, order=0, oom_adj=0 Jiri Slaby
06:44 Re: cc1plus invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x280da, order=0, oom_adj=0 Justin P. Mattock
06:24 Re: cc1plus invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x280da, order=0, oom_adj=0 Andrew Morton
05:21 Re: i370 port Paul Edwards
05:09 Re: PATCH: Support --enable-gold=both --with-linker=[bfd|gold] Roland McGrath
01:40 Re: cc1plus invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x280da, order=0, oom_adj=0 Justin P. Mattock
01:18 Re: cc1plus invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x280da, order=0, oom_adj=0 KOSAKI Motohiro

November 03, 2009
23:28 Re: PATCH: Support --enable-gold=both --with-linker=[bfd|gold] H.J. Lu
23:02 Re: Understanding IRA Jeff Law
22:50 gcc-4.4-20091103 is now available gccadmin
22:23 Re: PATCH: Support --enable-gold=both --with-linker=[bfd|gold] Roland McGrath
22:19 Re: PATCH: Support --enable-gold=both --with-linker=[bfd|gold] H.J. Lu
22:04 Re: Preserving the argument spills for GDB Ian Lance Taylor
21:15 Re: How to debug lto1 ICE? Andrew Pinski
21:12 Re: How to debug lto1 ICE? Rafael Espindola
21:09 Re: Preserving the argument spills for GDB Jean Christophe Beyler
20:57 How to debug lto1 ICE? Basile STARYNKEVITCH
19:01 Preserving the argument spills for GDB Jean Christophe Beyler
18:00 Re: help on - instruction scheduling passes in gcc Ian Lance Taylor
17:33 help on - instruction scheduling passes in gcc ddmetro
17:33 help on - instruction scheduling passes in gcc ddmetro
17:33 help on - instruction scheduling passes in gcc ddmetro
17:27 help on - instruction scheduling passes in gcc ddmetro
17:25 help on - instruction scheduling passes in gcc ddmetro
17:25 help on - instruction scheduling passes in gcc ddmetro
16:52 Re: Lattice Mico32 port David Edelsohn
16:29 RE: Understanding IRA Ian Bolton
03:39 [c++]pt.c:most_specialized_class appears to substitute outer args for inner params Larry Evans
00:56 Re: cc1plus invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x280da, order=0, oom_adj=0 Justin P. Mattock

November 02, 2009
22:34 Re: undefined reference to `gt_pch_nx_tree_code' Aravinda
22:12 Re: cc1plus invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x280da, order=0, oom_adj=0 Justin P. Mattock
22:06 PATCH: Support --enable-gold=both --with-linker=[bfd|gold] H.J. Lu
22:05 Re: cc1plus invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x280da, order=0, oom_adj=0 Jiri Slaby
22:02 Re: cc1plus invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x280da, order=0, oom_adj=0 Justin Mattock
21:49 Re: cc1plus invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x280da, order=0, oom_adj=0 Jiri Slaby
21:42 Re: Process for proposing new C/C++ language extensions. Basile STARYNKEVITCH
21:29 cc1plus invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x280da, order=0, oom_adj=0 Justin Mattock
21:28 Process for proposing new C/C++ language extensions. johnchristian
20:23 RE; BAD WEATHER IS COMING... How will you reach your people? info
20:20 RE: plugin hooks Grigori Fursin
20:20 incorrect place for LTO options description Denis Onischenko
18:01 RE; BAD WEATHER IS COMING... How will you reach your people? info
17:48 Re: Three old entries from PROBLEMS Richard Henderson
17:37 Re: Three old entries from PROBLEMS Richard Henderson
15:01 RE: RFC PRE-ing REFERENCE expressions Richard Guenther
14:59 RE: RFC PRE-ing REFERENCE expressions Rahul Kharche
14:45 Re: i370 port - constructing compile script Paul Edwards
12:47 RE: plugin hooks Joern Rennecke
10:07 Re: Three old entries from PROBLEMS Paolo Bonzini
07:57 Re: Three old entries from PROBLEMS Joern Rennecke
07:46 Re: Three old entries from PROBLEMS Joern Rennecke
03:06 Re: MPC 0.8 prerelease tarball (last release before MPC is mandatory!) Kaveh R. Ghazi
00:04 Re: Three old entries from PROBLEMS Paolo Bonzini

November 01, 2009
23:41 Three old entries from PROBLEMS Gerald Pfeifer
22:50 gcc-4.3-20091101 is now available gccadmin
22:45 Re: undefined reference to `gt_pch_nx_tree_code' Laurynas Biveinis
22:37 Re: undefined reference to `gt_pch_nx_tree_code' Aravinda
21:57 Re: MPC 0.8 prerelease tarball (last release before MPC is mandatory!) Kaz Kojima
20:28 Re: undefined reference to `gt_pch_nx_tree_code' Laurynas Biveinis
17:54 Re: MPC 0.8 prerelease tarball (last release before MPC is mandatory!) Gerald Pfeifer
05:02 Re: enable-build-with-cxx bootstrap compare broken by r149964 Jason Merrill
00:17 Re: MPC 0.8 prerelease tarball (last release before MPC is mandatory!) John David Anglin

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:
Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.3