This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: delete dead feature branches?
- From: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer dot com>
- To: Ben Elliston <bje at au1 dot ibm dot com>
- Cc: Michael Matz <matz at suse dot de>, Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>, Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu dot org>, "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>, Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>, gdr at integrable-solutions dot net, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2009 15:54:22 +0100 (CET)
- Subject: Re: delete dead feature branches?
- References: <h9in34$4pu$1@ger.gmane.org> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0909251650450.30532@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <4ABD0F1E.5030807@redhat.com> <206fcf960909251214u5770c7b5o141614226e28fdff@mail.gmail.com> <84fc9c000909251220r62d518bka48cd3a13d0d5ea0@mail.gmail.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0909251932570.6234@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <4AD33BA2.60107@gnu.org> <4AD39C64.3020304@redhat.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0910130303090.15566@wotan.suse.de> <1255481458.22828.2.camel@helios>
On Wed, 14 Oct 2009, Ben Elliston wrote:
> I deleted a personal branch from 5 years ago and have added the revision
> number of the delete commit to the branch description in svn.html.
>
> Would these two conventions suffice?
Would it make sense to document the outcome of this conversation in
svn.html?
Gerald