This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: dg-error vs. i18n?

From: Dave Korn <dave dot korn dot cygwin at googlemail dot com>
To: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>, Dave Korn <dave dot korn dot cygwin at googlemail dot com>, "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2009 01:35:48 +0100
Subject: Re: dg-error vs. i18n?
References: <4AE235E4.2060005@gmail.com> <84fc9c000910231559y194a9ccfyfb9414f8ed04a361@mail.gmail.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0910232305540.30905@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>

Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Oct 2009, Richard Guenther wrote:
> 
>> The testsuite should run with C locale.
> 
> Unfortunately it appears there are now some systems where C no longer 
> implies ASCII, causing problems for predictability of output.  So the 
> testsuite may need to check the host and use other host-specific names 
> (C.US-ASCII?) in some cases.

  Thanks, that was it.  Had to use "C.CP437" in the end, apparently we have
charset encoding names for lots of OEM code pages but none for plain vanilla
ASCII.

    cheers,
      DaveK

Follow-Ups:
- Re: dg-error vs. i18n?
  - From: Charles Wilson

References:
- dg-error vs. i18n?
  - From: Dave Korn
- Re: dg-error vs. i18n?
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: dg-error vs. i18n?
  - From: Joseph S. Myers

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]