This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: LTO and LTO Plugin Reviewers

From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>
To: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at google dot com>
Cc: Basile STARYNKEVITCH <basile at starynkevitch dot net>, David Edelsohn <edelsohn at gnu dot org>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, espindola at google dot com, ccoutant at google dot com, rguenther at suse dot de
Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2009 07:12:07 -0700
Subject: Re: LTO and LTO Plugin Reviewers
References: <E1MvWhf-0001VT-KA@fencepost.gnu.org> <4ACC9DBC.90505@starynkevitch.net> <b798aad50910070702t2a54a1e6ob10e216c85527e75@mail.gmail.com>

Diego Novillo <dnovillo@google.com> writes:

> On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 09:55, Basile STARYNKEVITCH
> <basile@starynkevitch.net> wrote:
>
>> Are LTO plugins fondamentally different from others, non LTO plugins?
>
> Yes, it should be probably be named 'linker' plugins.  It's a plugin
> for gold to allow extraction of individual .o files out of static
> archives during LTO compiles.

And it presumably is specifically the contents of the new lto-plugin
toplevel directory.

Ian

Follow-Ups:
- Re: LTO and LTO Plugin Reviewers
  - From: Diego Novillo

References:
- LTO and LTO Plugin Reviewers
  - From: David Edelsohn
- Re: LTO and LTO Plugin Reviewers
  - From: Basile STARYNKEVITCH
- Re: LTO and LTO Plugin Reviewers
  - From: Diego Novillo

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]