This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: DImode operations

From: daniel tian <daniel dot xntian at gmail dot com>
To: Dave Korn <dave dot korn dot cygwin at googlemail dot com>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, peng dot zheng at mavrixtech dot com
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 09:43:23 +0800
Subject: Re: DImode operations
References: <121fadb80909230410x71ca0e0co65202ab901266846@mail.gmail.com> <4ABA1F9F.5050402@gmail.com> <121fadb80909240005l3e6b5311s5740258ac411a999@mail.gmail.com> <121fadb80909240201q2d6c104eveeacf95787387b8e@mail.gmail.com> <4ABB8B58.1070904@gmail.com> <121fadb80909280239n4c3419afic2baaea3b9a3cd66@mail.gmail.com> <4AC0B71C.8000502@gmail.com>

Yeah. You are right. I debuged the cc1 file with insight. It caused by
FUNCTION_VALUE macro which means the error happened in function
return. Because my target always return a SImode. I fixed it.

To debug the cc1 is always a good point to hack the bug.

But there are still other error exist. I still need to fix them.

Thanks for all your guys.
Best regards.

                             daniel

Follow-Ups:
- Re: DImode operations
  - From: daniel tian

References:
- DImode operations
  - From: daniel tian
- Re: DImode operations
  - From: Dave Korn
- Re: DImode operations
  - From: daniel tian
- Re: DImode operations
  - From: daniel tian
- Re: DImode operations
  - From: Dave Korn
- Re: DImode operations
  - From: daniel tian
- Re: DImode operations
  - From: Dave Korn

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]