This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

RE: the cause of PR41260 is new additional epilog unwind information


On Fri, 18 Sep 2009, Jack Howarth wrote:

>    I can confirm that the second proposed solution of passing -Wl,-no_compact_unwind
> to the linkage of the g++.dg/torture/stackalign/eh-vararg-2.C test cases eliminates
> the execution error on x86_64-apple-darwin10 so that option works. This leads to a
> dejagnu question. I want to do a quick and dirty test to see that -Wl,-no_compact_unwind
> suppresses all of the regressions that appeared at r147995, however I can't puzzle out
> how to formulate...
> 
> make -k check RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=unix'{-Wl,-no_compact_unwind}'"
> 
> such that -Wl,-no_compact_unwind is interpreted as a single run with
> one flag being passed (ie not one run with -Wl and one run with
> -no_compact_unwind). Any ideas?

The -Xlinker spelling may be useful - try 
"--target_board=unix/-Xlinker/-no_compact_unwind".

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]