This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [gcc-in-cxx] replacing qsort with std::sort

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Pedro Lamarão <pedro dot lamarao at ccppbrasil dot org>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 07:41:22 -0700
Subject: Re: [gcc-in-cxx] replacing qsort with std::sort
References: <15727b460908111703l682ab204l39700c8bfde50577@mail.gmail.com> <15727b460908281412u3334d7fbrc527be0dde42e62f@mail.gmail.com> <1251532218.3790.10.camel@sara.home> <15727b460908291549t1c87c6bbi57d20b1539360f9a@mail.gmail.com>

On 08/29/2009 03:49 PM, Pedro Lamarão wrote:

2009/8/29 Magnus Fromreide<magfr@lysator.liu.se>:


Why the changes to gcc/system.h where you unpoision malloc and realloc?
Why the changes to libcpp/system.h where you unpoision malloc, realloc,
calloc and strdup?


Including<algorithm>  requires them for some reason.
I haven't really looked into it.


You should simply include <algorithm> in system.h before
the poisoning.

r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [gcc-in-cxx] replacing qsort with std::sort
  - From: Pedro Lamarão

References:
- [gcc-in-cxx] replacing qsort with std::sort
  - From: Pedro Lamarão
- Re: [gcc-in-cxx] replacing qsort with std::sort
  - From: Pedro Lamarão
- Re: [gcc-in-cxx] replacing qsort with std::sort
  - From: Magnus Fromreide
- Re: [gcc-in-cxx] replacing qsort with std::sort
  - From: Pedro Lamarão

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]