This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: libiberty should be a shared library when cc1 has plugin enabled.

From: Basile STARYNKEVITCH <basile at starynkevitch dot net>
To: drow at false dot org, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2009 15:45:52 +0200
Subject: Re: libiberty should be a shared library when cc1 has plugin enabled.
References: <20090709084949.GA27192@hector.lesours> <20090709125004.GA4445@caradoc.them.org> <4A55EA0D.2080509@starynkevitch.net> <20090709134318.GA8237@caradoc.them.org>

Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:

On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 03:01:01PM +0200, Basile STARYNKEVITCH wrote:
In simpler words, *.so have to be compiled with -fPIC, and libiberty is not compiled with -fPIC.
We build a PIC libiberty already.

Thanks!

Where and how is it built? I cannot find any *iberty*.so in my build tree!

Regards.


--
Basile STARYNKEVITCH         http://starynkevitch.net/Basile/
email: basile<at>starynkevitch<dot>net mobile: +33 6 8501 2359
8, rue de la Faiencerie, 92340 Bourg La Reine, France
*** opinions {are only mines, sont seulement les miennes} ***

Follow-Ups:
- Re: libiberty should be a shared library when cc1 has plugin enabled.
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

References:
- libiberty should be a shared library when cc1 has plugin enabled.
  - From: Basile Starynkevitch
- Re: libiberty should be a shared library when cc1 has plugin enabled.
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: libiberty should be a shared library when cc1 has plugin enabled.
  - From: Basile STARYNKEVITCH
- Re: libiberty should be a shared library when cc1 has plugin enabled.
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]