This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: GCC build failure, HEAD@149166 on native

From: Paolo Bonzini <paolo dot bonzini at gmail dot com>
To: David Edelsohn <dje dot gcc at gmail dot com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu dot org>, Geoff Keating <geoffk at geoffk dot org>, Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>, Dominique Dhumieres <dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr>, "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "charlet at adacore dot com" <charlet at adacore dot com>
Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2009 13:47:31 +0200
Subject: Re: GCC build failure, HEAD@149166 on native
References: <20090702091955.D8EA93BE7B@mailhost.lps.ens.fr> <84fc9c000907020235y3bcd55fdp9e7e6524be6415f7@mail.gmail.com> <08BB2DAF-5005-40F2-B1B3-C269D252BD0E@geoffk.org> <4A4D254C.50201@gnu.org> <303e1d290907030437p17364160i6c73e7458dcffb0e@mail.gmail.com>

What is wrong about failures being annoying?

Paolo, you could have reverted your original patch and worked with the
PowerPC developers to test a revised patch.

If I had been asked, I would have.

Paolo

References:
- Re: Re: GCC build failure, HEAD@149166 on native
  - From: Dominique Dhumieres
- Re: Re: GCC build failure, HEAD@149166 on native
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: GCC build failure, HEAD@149166 on native
  - From: Geoff Keating
- Re: GCC build failure, HEAD@149166 on native
  - From: Paolo Bonzini
- Re: GCC build failure, HEAD@149166 on native
  - From: David Edelsohn

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]