Re: GCC build failure, HEAD@149166 on native

[Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gmail dot com>]

Sent from my iPhone

On Jul 2, 2009, at 4:18 AM, Paolo Bonzini <bonzini@gnu.org> wrote:

> On 07/02/2009 12:06 PM, Dominique Dhumieres wrote:
> > Andrew Haley wrote
> > > Is this really a good idea?  Surely the solution is to fix the
> > > failures on Darwin.
> >
> > I don't this is a good idea. As noted by Andrew Pinski, one failure
> > was Darwin specific and is now fixed, two others are powerpc ones.
> > When they will be fixed on trunk the annoying mails will  
> > automatically
> > disappear.
>
> However, this does not mean that tuning the regression tester to not  
> sending more than 6 emails a day (one every 4 hours) would be a bad  
> idea.

It is once every commit until it is fixed which seems like the correct  
way of doing it really. We really should be frozen during the period  
it is broken. Otherwise more things break like what happened here.

--Pinski

> Paolo