This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: GCC build failure, HEAD@149166 on native

From: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu dot org>
To: Dominique Dhumieres <dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr>
Cc: richard dot guenther at gmail dot com, geoffk at geoffk dot org, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, charlet at adacore dot com
Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2009 13:18:29 +0200
Subject: Re: GCC build failure, HEAD@149166 on native
References: <20090702091955.D8EA93BE7B@mailhost.lps.ens.fr> <84fc9c000907020235y3bcd55fdp9e7e6524be6415f7@mail.gmail.com> <20090702100630.EB2C43BE7B@mailhost.lps.ens.fr>

On 07/02/2009 12:06 PM, Dominique Dhumieres wrote:

Andrew Haley wrote

Is this really a good idea?  Surely the solution is to fix the
failures on Darwin.


I don't this is a good idea. As noted by Andrew Pinski, one failure
was Darwin specific and is now fixed, two others are powerpc ones.
When they will be fixed on trunk the annoying mails will automatically
disappear.

However, this does not mean that tuning the regression tester to not sending more than 6 emails a day (one every 4 hours) would be a bad idea.

Paolo

Follow-Ups:
- Re: GCC build failure, HEAD@149166 on native
  - From: Dominique Dhumieres
- Re: GCC build failure, HEAD@149166 on native
  - From: Andrew Pinski

References:
- Re: Re: GCC build failure, HEAD@149166 on native
  - From: Dominique Dhumieres
- Re: Re: GCC build failure, HEAD@149166 on native
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: Re: GCC build failure, HEAD@149166 on native
  - From: Dominique Dhumieres

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]