Re: Should -Wjump-misses-init be in -Wall?

[Miles Bader <miles at gnu dot org>]

Gabriel Dos Reis <dosreis@gmail.com> writes:
> Historically, many C programmers have resisted that idea (even when we could
> argue that it really is bad style programming.)

They have?(!)

This warning warns about:   goto L; { int x = 3; L: ... }
but not about:              goto L; { int x; L: ... }
right?

So... is the idea that there might be code that assigns to x after L:,
before the first use of x, making the warning superfluous?

-Miles

-- 
Twice, adv. Once too often.