This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Address mode offset spill

From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>
To: Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>
Cc: daniel tian <daniel dot xntian at gmail dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 15:12:25 -0700
Subject: Re: Address mode offset spill
References: <121fadb80906140733g6b1eec5eg4ea945867f4affb7@mail.gmail.com> <m3y6rt8jne.fsf@google.com> <4A36B7A3.5040403@redhat.com>

Jeff Law <law@redhat.com> writes:

>> I would fix this in LEGITIMIZE_RELOAD_ADDRESS or in
>> TARGET_SECONDARY_RELOAD.  I don't know why cc1 crashed, you will have to
>> debug that.
>>   
> LEGITIMIZE_RELOAD_ADDRESS is not the right place to handle this -- 
> LEGITIMIZE_RELOAD_ADDRESS is to be used when target specific
> approaches for reloading can generate more efficient code than the
> generic code in reload.   The generic code should be producing
> correct, though potentially inefficient code.

I will just note that this is a long-standing point of disagreement
between Jeff and me.

Ian

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Address mode offset spill
  - From: Jeff Law

References:
- Address mode offset spill
  - From: daniel tian
- Re: Address mode offset spill
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: Address mode offset spill
  - From: Jeff Law

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]