This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: increasing the number of GCC reviewers

From: Ben Elliston <bje at au1 dot ibm dot com>
To: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
Cc: Adam Nemet <anemet at caviumnetworks dot com>, Basile STARYNKEVITCH <basile at starynkevitch dot net>, GCC Mailing List <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 10:13:54 +1000
Subject: Re: increasing the number of GCC reviewers
References: <4A2E8528.8090604@starynkevitch.net> <4A2E91B2.7040703@redhat.com> <4A2E9922.1090208@starynkevitch.net> <4A2E9C70.7090703@redhat.com> <o7vdn59ttt.fsf@ropi.home> <4A2EA351.3030004@redhat.com>

On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 19:00 +0100, Andrew Haley wrote:

> I think it's a much better idea to contact Fred (or Freda, for that matter)
> Bloggs to ask them if they want to maintain reload.  :-)

Wouldn't it be Alan Smithee to maintain reload? :-)

Ben

Follow-Ups:
- Re: increasing the number of GCC reviewers
  - From: Dave Korn

References:
- increasing the number of GCC reviewers
  - From: Basile STARYNKEVITCH
- Re: increasing the number of GCC reviewers
  - From: Andrew Haley
- Re: increasing the number of GCC reviewers
  - From: Basile STARYNKEVITCH
- Re: increasing the number of GCC reviewers
  - From: Andrew Haley
- Re: increasing the number of GCC reviewers
  - From: Adam Nemet
- Re: increasing the number of GCC reviewers
  - From: Andrew Haley

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]