gcc archive
date index for June, 2009

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

June 30, 2009
22:55 gcc-4.4-20090630 is now available gccadmin
19:22 Re: Updating fixed-point support for new C constant expression handling Joseph S. Myers
19:11 ID CF 300609216222 cf
18:37 Re: gcc_update broken because of r149070 Paolo Bonzini
18:31 Updating fixed-point support for new C constant expression handling Richard Sandiford
17:59 Re: howto configure so that CFLAGS='-g3 -O0' in gcc/Makefile? Jonathan Wakely
17:26 gcc_update broken because of r149070 Steven Bosscher
16:56 Re: Should -Wjump-misses-init be in -Wall? Mark Mitchell
16:46 Re: Failure building trunk on cygwin Dave Korn
16:38 Re: Submitting patches for FreeBSD amd64 Andrew Haley
16:36 Submitting patches for FreeBSD amd64 gcc
15:41 Failure building trunk on cygwin Rainer Emrich
15:16 Questions on exported plugin headers: minimal or full? Basile STARYNKEVITCH
15:14 Tobias Grosser appointed Graphite maintainer David Edelsohn
15:01 howto configure so that CFLAGS='-g3 -O0' in gcc/Makefile? Larry Evans
14:22 Re: BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT vs g++ compat test expectation on aix ? David Edelsohn
12:05 Re: Register Pressure in Instruction Level Parallelism Albert Cohen
06:20 RE: How to deal with unrecognizable RTL code daniel.tian
02:24 Re: Base register restrictions Jim Wilson
02:08 Re: How to deal with unrecognizable RTL code Jim Wilson

June 29, 2009
23:38 Re: Base register restrictions Brice Dobry
21:48 Re: GCC feature req: warn when bitops exceed type size (was: conntrack untracked match is broken) Manuel López-Ibáñez
21:11 Re: Base register restrictions Ian Lance Taylor
21:09 Re: PR 23296: Strange -O3 -finstrument-functions behaviour Ian Lance Taylor
21:04 Re: How to deal with unrecognizable RTL code Ian Lance Taylor
20:40 Re: Exploring gcc-in-cxx compiler build requirements Ian Lance Taylor
20:03 Re: Register Pressure in Instruction Level Parallelism Michael Kruse
19:35 Re: Register Pressure in Instruction Level Parallelism Vladimir Makarov
19:02 Re: Register Pressure in Instruction Level Parallelism Michael Kruse
18:38 Base register restrictions Dobes
18:30 Re: GCC feature req: warn when bitops exceed type size (was: conntrack untracked match is broken) Jan Engelhardt
18:23 Re: Updating Autoconf and Automake versions used in GCC and src Tom Tromey
18:04 Re: Updating Autoconf and Automake versions used in GCC and src Ralf Wildenhues
17:05 Re: Updating Autoconf and Automake versions used in GCC and src Tom Tromey
16:27 Re: Register Pressure in Instruction Level Parallelism Vladimir Makarov
16:26 Re: Register Pressure in Instruction Level Parallelism Vladimir Makarov
16:25 Re: Register Pressure in Instruction Level Parallelism Vladimir Makarov
14:23 Re: Phase 1 of gcc-in-cxx now complete Gabriel Dos Reis
14:10 Re: GCC feature req: warn when bitops exceed type size (was: conntrack untracked match is broken) Manuel López-Ibáñez
14:06 PR 23296: Strange -O3 -finstrument-functions behaviour Richard Sandiford
13:59 BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT vs g++ compat test expectation on aix ? Olivier Hainque
13:13 Re: GCC feature req: warn when bitops exceed type size (was: conntrack untracked match is broken) Richard Guenther
13:10 GCC feature req: warn when bitops exceed type size (was: conntrack untracked match is broken) Jan Engelhardt
10:52 Re: Phase 1 of gcc-in-cxx now complete Andrew Haley
10:40 Re: Phase 1 of gcc-in-cxx now complete NightStrike
09:54 Re:How to deal with unrecognizable RTL code daniel.tian
09:41 答复: How to deal with unrecognizable RTL co de daniel.tian
06:28 Re: Compiling gcc 4.4.0 for Cell Paolo Bonzini
06:13 Re: Compiling gcc 4.4.0 for Cell Revital1 Eres
00:30 Re: Fwd: Register Pressure in Instruction Level Parallelism Kenneth Zadeck
00:03 Re: Register Pressure in Instruction Level Parallelism Albert Cohen

June 28, 2009
23:56 Re: Register Pressure in Instruction Level Parallelism Michael Kruse
23:01 Re: Register Pressure in Instruction Level Parallelism Dave Korn
23:00 Re: Register Pressure in Instruction Level Parallelism Dave Korn
22:53 Re: Register Pressure in Instruction Level Parallelism Michael Kruse
22:45 gcc-4.3-20090628 is now available gccadmin
22:24 Re: Register Pressure in Instruction Level Parallelism Albert Cohen
22:15 Re: [gnat] reuse of ASTs already constructed Oliver Kellogg
19:06 Compiling gcc 4.4.0 for Cell Phil Pratt-Szeliga
18:53 GCC Summit proceedings? Chris Lattner
12:37 Re: Register Pressure in Instruction Level Parallelism Dave Korn
11:59 Re: Updating Autoconf and Automake versions used in GCC and src Joseph S. Myers
10:30 Register Pressure in Instruction Level Parallelism Michael Kruse
09:41 Good progress Michael Hope
07:25 Updating Autoconf and Automake versions used in GCC and src Ralf Wildenhues
03:09 Exploring gcc-in-cxx compiler build requirements Jerry Quinn

June 27, 2009
22:25 Re: Phase 1 of gcc-in-cxx now complete Ian Lance Taylor
22:15 The Linux binutils 2.19.51.0.11 is released H.J. Lu
19:50 Inline Assembly queries kernel mailz
18:07 Re: Phase 1 of gcc-in-cxx now complete Sebastian Pop
16:51 Re: Phase 1 of gcc-in-cxx now complete David Edelsohn
16:14 Re: Phase 1 of gcc-in-cxx now complete Adam Nemet
15:19 Re: Phase 1 of gcc-in-cxx now complete (Ada) Paolo Bonzini
13:41 Re: Phase 1 of gcc-in-cxx now complete Robert Dewar
13:39 Re: Phase 1 of gcc-in-cxx now complete Daniel Berlin
12:53 Re: Phase 1 of gcc-in-cxx now complete (Ada) Laurent GUERBY
11:54 Re: Phase 1 of gcc-in-cxx now complete (Ada) Laurent GUERBY
11:24 Re: Phase 1 of gcc-in-cxx now complete (Ada) Eric Botcazou
10:55 Re: Phase 1 of gcc-in-cxx now complete (Ada) Laurent GUERBY
10:35 Re: Phase 1 of gcc-in-cxx now complete (Ada) Eric Botcazou
09:48 Re: Phase 1 of gcc-in-cxx now complete Richard Guenther
00:55 Re: Phase 1 of gcc-in-cxx now complete Ian Lance Taylor
00:26 Re: Failure building current 4.5 snapshot on Cygwin Seiji Kachi

June 26, 2009
23:53 Re: Phase 1 of gcc-in-cxx now complete Matt
19:52 Re: Phase 1 of gcc-in-cxx now complete (Ada) Ian Lance Taylor
19:28 Re: unsigned integer wrap 'trap'. Ian Lance Taylor
19:24 Re: (known?) Issue with bitmap iterators Alexander Monakov
19:24 Re: Phase 1 of gcc-in-cxx now complete (Ada) Arnaud Charlet
18:21 Re: Phase 1 of gcc-in-cxx now complete (Ada) Laurent GUERBY
18:18 Re: Phase 1 of gcc-in-cxx now complete Adam Nemet
18:07 Re: Phase 1 of gcc-in-cxx now complete (Ada) Robert Dewar
17:59 Re: Phase 1 of gcc-in-cxx now complete (Ada) Ian Lance Taylor
17:38 Re: Phase 1 of gcc-in-cxx now complete (Ada) Arnaud Charlet
17:36 Re: Phase 1 of gcc-in-cxx now complete (Ada) Robert Dewar
17:32 Re: Phase 1 of gcc-in-cxx now complete (Ada) Arnaud Charlet
17:29 Re: Phase 1 of gcc-in-cxx now complete (Ada) Ian Lance Taylor
17:06 Re: Failure building current 4.5 snapshot on Cygwin Tim Prince
17:01 Re: Failure building current 4.5 snapshot on Cygwin Steve Kargl
16:51 Re: Failure building current 4.5 snapshot on Cygwin Angelo Graziosi
16:36 Re: (known?) Issue with bitmap iterators Joe Buck
16:28 Re: Failure building current 4.5 snapshot on Cygwin Steve Kargl
16:17 Re: Failure building current 4.5 snapshot on Cygwin Kai Tietz
16:15 Re: Problem on Front-End List Page Joe Buck
15:59 Problem on Front-End List Page Bryce
15:59 Re: Phase 1 of gcc-in-cxx now complete (Ada) Laurent GUERBY
15:41 Re: Failure building current 4.5 snapshot on Cygwin Tim Prince
15:36 Re: Failure building current 4.5 snapshot on Cygwin Tim Prince
14:48 Re: Phase 1 of gcc-in-cxx now complete (Ada) Arnaud Charlet
14:44 Re: Phase 1 of gcc-in-cxx now complete (Ada) Ian Lance Taylor
14:33 Re: Any ideas how to get the IRA to choose one subclass of registers over another in the same cover class? Dave Hudson
14:12 Re: Failure building current 4.5 snapshot on Cygwin Tim Prince
13:52 Re: Phase 1 of gcc-in-cxx now complete Jack Howarth
13:19 Re: Failure building current 4.5 snapshot on Cygwin Kai Tietz
13:09 Re: Failure building current 4.5 snapshot on Cygwin Seiji Kachi
11:42 Re: Failure building current 4.5 snapshot on Cygwin Angelo Graziosi
11:20 Re: Failure building current 4.5 snapshot on Cygwin Dave Korn
11:18 Re: Phase 1 of gcc-in-cxx now complete (Ada) Laurent GUERBY
10:47 Failure building current 4.5 snapshot on Cygwin Angelo Graziosi
10:38 Re: (known?) Issue with bitmap iterators Alexander Monakov
07:22 About machine.md in insight-gdb debug daniel tian
07:09 unsigned integer wrap 'trap'. samboy
06:33 Re: Phase 1 of gcc-in-cxx now complete Gabriel Dos Reis
03:34 Re: Address mode offset spill daniel tian
03:28 Re: Address mode offset spill daniel tian

June 25, 2009
22:51 gcc-4.5-20090625 is now available gccadmin
22:49 Re: Phase 1 of gcc-in-cxx now complete (Ada) Ian Lance Taylor
22:47 Re: Phase 1 of gcc-in-cxx now complete Joe Buck
22:39 Re: Phase 1 of gcc-in-cxx now complete Eric Botcazou
22:38 Re: (known?) Issue with bitmap iterators Dave Korn
22:29 Re: Phase 1 of gcc-in-cxx now complete (Ada) Ian Lance Taylor
22:19 Re: Phase 1 of gcc-in-cxx now complete Joseph S. Myers
22:17 Re: Phase 1 of gcc-in-cxx now complete (Ada) Richard Guenther
21:50 Re: Phase 1 of gcc-in-cxx now complete (Ada) Laurent GUERBY
21:39 Re: ICE building svn trunk on Ubuntu 9.x amd64 Matt
20:36 Re: Phase 1 of gcc-in-cxx now complete Richard Guenther
20:33 Re: Address mode offset spill Jeff Law
20:32 Phase 1 of gcc-in-cxx now complete Ian Lance Taylor
20:24 Re: Address mode offset spill Jeff Law
20:17 Re: Should -Wjump-misses-init be in -Wall? Manuel López-Ibáñez
20:15 Re: Address mode offset spill Jeff Law
19:18 Re: Should -Wjump-misses-init be in -Wall? Richard Guenther
18:43 Re: How to deal with unrecognizable RTL code Jeff Law
18:37 Re: How to deal with unrecognizable RTL code Jeff Law
18:24 Re: (known?) Issue with bitmap iterators Jeff Law
18:18 Re: Any ideas how to get the IRA to choose one subclass of registers over another in the same cover class? Jeff Law
18:11 Re: Should -Wjump-misses-init be in -Wall? Manuel López-Ibáñez
13:09 Re: (known?) Issue with bitmap iterators Daniel Berlin
07:32 Re: Question about dead_or_predicable Steven Bosscher

June 24, 2009
16:22 Any ideas how to get the IRA to choose one subclass of registers over another in the same cover class? Dave Hudson
15:35 Re: Question about dead_or_predicable Richard Henderson
12:42 Re: plugins directory? Diego Novillo
10:16 Re: How to deal with unrecognizable RTL code daniel tian
09:37 Re: How to deal with unrecognizable RTL code Dave Korn
09:36 Re: How to deal with unrecognizable RTL code Paolo Bonzini
09:35 Re: How to deal with unrecognizable RTL code Dave Korn
08:56 re: How to deal with unrecognizable RTL code daniel.tian
07:06 Re: Basic frontend question about layout Eric Botcazou
05:41 Re: Question about dead_or_predicable Steven Bosscher
04:18 Re: Basic frontend question about layout Jerry Quinn
03:52 Re: Basic frontend question about layout Andrew Pinski
03:48 Basic frontend question about layout Jerry Quinn
02:45 Things in specs vs. things explicit in the generated source [was Re: [PATCH] Pass -mtune and -march options to assembler.] Dave Korn

June 23, 2009
23:37 Re: Question about dead_or_predicable Dave Korn
22:50 gcc-4.4-20090623 is now available gccadmin
22:27 Question about dead_or_predicable Steven Bosscher
22:20 Re: TEMPLATE_PARM_PARAMETER_PACK redundant check in find_parameter_packs_r Ian Lance Taylor
22:00 Re: [gnu.org #456639] broken link in libstdc++ manual online Jonathan Wakely
21:36 [gnu.org #456639] broken link in libstdc++ manual online Rob Myers via RT
19:53 TEMPLATE_PARM_PARAMETER_PACK redundant check in find_parameter_packs_r Larry Evans
18:41 Re: Should -Wjump-misses-init be in -Wall? Ian Lance Taylor
16:48 Re: Should -Wjump-misses-init be in -Wall? Paolo Bonzini
16:46 Re: Should -Wjump-misses-init be in -Wall? Joe Buck
16:33 Re: Should -Wjump-misses-init be in -Wall? Gabriel Dos Reis
16:18 Re: OpenCL inquire Phil Pratt-Szeliga
16:12 Re: Should -Wjump-misses-init be in -Wall? Joe Buck
15:14 Re: [OTish] Proving compiler algorithms implement same semantics as language specs? [was Re: [PATCH][RFC] Re-implement restrict support] Joseph S. Myers
14:55 Re: [OTish] Proving compiler algorithms implement same semantics as language specs? [was Re: [PATCH][RFC] Re-implement restrict support] Richard Guenther
14:41 [OTish] Proving compiler algorithms implement same semantics as language specs? [was Re: [PATCH][RFC] Re-implement restrict support] Dave Korn
14:25 -funswitch-loops slowdown.is it possible to change settings in backend ? Bernd Roesch
13:56 RE: Unnecessary regmoves in modulo scheduler? Revital1 Eres
13:48 RE: Unnecessary regmoves in modulo scheduler? Bingfeng Mei
13:41 Re: Unnecessary regmoves in modulo scheduler? Revital1 Eres
09:33 Re: gcc 4.3.2 vectorizes access to volatile array Andrew Haley
07:35 Re: Should -Wjump-misses-init be in -Wall? Gabriel Dos Reis
05:48 Re: plugins directory? Basile STARYNKEVITCH
05:43 Re: Should -Wjump-misses-init be in -Wall? Alan Modra
04:10 Re: Should -Wjump-misses-init be in -Wall? Gabriel Dos Reis
03:44 Re: Should -Wjump-misses-init be in -Wall? Miles Bader
01:46 Re: Should -Wjump-misses-init be in -Wall? Robert Dewar
00:18 Re: Should -Wjump-misses-init be in -Wall? Joe Buck

June 22, 2009
23:51 Re: Should -Wjump-misses-init be in -Wall? Kaveh R. GHAZI
20:03 Re: gcc 4.3.2 vectorizes access to volatile array Till Straumann
19:20 Re: gcc 4.3.2 vectorizes access to volatile array Andrew Haley
19:07 Re: (known?) Issue with bitmap iterators Dave Korn
19:03 Re: (known?) Issue with bitmap iterators Dave Korn
18:27 Re: gcc 4.3.2 vectorizes access to volatile array H.J. Lu
18:15 Re: gcc 4.3.2 vectorizes access to volatile array Till Straumann
17:53 Re: gcc 4.3.2 vectorizes access to volatile array Andrew Haley
17:46 Re: (known?) Issue with bitmap iterators Joe Buck
17:06 Re: (known?) Issue with bitmap iterators Jeff Law
15:42 Re: git mirror at gcc.gnu.org Jason Merrill
14:47 gcc 4.3.2 vectorizes access to volatile array Till Straumann
14:27 Re: (known?) Issue with bitmap iterators Andrew MacLeod
14:10 Unnecessary regmoves in modulo scheduler? Bingfeng Mei
13:38 Re: (known?) Issue with bitmap iterators Paolo Bonzini
13:06 Re: (known?) Issue with bitmap iterators Dave Korn
12:59 Re: an opencl to ati stream converter David Edelsohn
11:37 Re: (known?) Issue with bitmap iterators Richard Guenther
11:35 Re: plugins directory? Richard Guenther
11:33 Re: (known?) Issue with bitmap iterators Dave Korn
11:21 Re: How to deal with unrecognizable RTL code Dave Korn
11:20 plugins directory? Basile STARYNKEVITCH
02:44 Re: (known?) Issue with bitmap iterators Daniel Berlin
01:56 re: How to deal with unrecognizable RTL code daniel.tian

June 21, 2009
22:46 gcc-4.3-20090621 is now available gccadmin
11:50 Re: VTA merge? Richard Guenther
11:38 Re: VTA merge? Richard Guenther
11:02 Re: VTA merge? Richard Guenther
05:01 Re: VTA merge? Alexandre Oliva
03:39 Re: Should -Wjump-misses-init be in -Wall? Ian Lance Taylor
03:27 Re: (known?) Issue with bitmap iterators Peter Bergner
01:14 Re: gcc Digest 20 Jun 2009 16:26:41 -0000 Issue 5996 Brian O'Mahoney

June 20, 2009
21:01 an opencl to ati stream converter soufiane BAGHDADI
17:36 Re: Ping: New Toshiba Media Processor (mep-elf) port and maintainer Gerald Pfeifer
16:26 Re: Should -Wjump-misses-init be in -Wall? Gabriel Dos Reis
15:52 Re: Should -Wjump-misses-init be in -Wall? Gerald Pfeifer
15:40 Re: Should -Wjump-misses-init be in -Wall? Robert Dewar
15:06 Re: Should -Wjump-misses-init be in -Wall? Robert Dewar
15:01 Re: (known?) Issue with bitmap iterators Richard Guenther
14:53 (known?) Issue with bitmap iterators Jeff Law
14:53 Re: Should -Wjump-misses-init be in -Wall? Jeff Law
14:32 Re: Should -Wjump-misses-init be in -Wall? Gabriel Dos Reis
14:28 Re: Should -Wjump-misses-init be in -Wall? Gabriel Dos Reis
14:26 Re: Should -Wjump-misses-init be in -Wall? Robert Dewar
14:06 Re: Should -Wjump-misses-init be in -Wall? James Dennett
13:58 Re: Should -Wjump-misses-init be in -Wall? H.J. Lu
13:50 Re: Should -Wjump-misses-init be in -Wall? James Dennett
13:18 Re: Should -Wjump-misses-init be in -Wall? H.J. Lu
08:38 Re: git mirror at gcc.gnu.org Bernie Innocenti
07:04 Re: Should -Wjump-misses-init be in -Wall? Ian Lance Taylor
07:02 Re: Should -Wjump-misses-init be in -Wall? Ian Lance Taylor
06:56 Re: Should -Wjump-misses-init be in -Wall? Ralf Wildenhues
06:27 Re: Should -Wjump-misses-init be in -Wall? Basile STARYNKEVITCH
05:13 Should -Wjump-misses-init be in -Wall? Ian Lance Taylor
03:00 Re: git mirror at gcc.gnu.org Jason Merrill

June 19, 2009
22:01 Re: [plugins] language makefiles and installing cp/ headers Joseph S. Myers
21:54 [plugins] language makefiles and installing cp/ headers Taras Glek
16:16 Re: gcj build issues. Tom Tromey
12:28 Re: i370 port Ulrich Weigand
11:56 Re: How to deal with unrecognizable RTL code Paolo Bonzini
09:13 Re: gcj build issues. Andrew Haley
08:08 How to deal with unrecognizable RTL code 田晓南
01:32 Re: Ping: New Toshiba Media Processor (mep-elf) port and maintainer DJ Delorie
00:51 Re: gcj build issues. Dave Korn
00:14 Re: Ping: New Toshiba Media Processor (mep-elf) port and maintainer Michael Meissner
00:06 Re: i370 port Paul Edwards

June 18, 2009
23:39 Re: GCC and boehm-gc Michael Meissner
22:53 gcj build issues. Edward Peschko
22:44 gcc-4.5-20090618 is now available gccadmin
21:41 Re: GCC and boehm-gc NightStrike
21:39 The Linux binutils 2.19.51.0.10 is released. H.J. Lu
21:16 Re: GCC and boehm-gc Hans Boehm
20:58 Re: VTA merge? Alexandre Oliva
19:19 Re: GCC and boehm-gc Andrew Haley
18:20 Re: GCC and boehm-gc NightStrike
18:05 Re: VTA merge? Gerald Pfeifer
18:03 Re: GCC and boehm-gc Andrew Haley
17:37 Re: Reorg and renaming registers fearyourself
17:17 Re: GCC and boehm-gc David Daney
17:09 Re: GCC and boehm-gc NightStrike
17:08 Re: GCC and boehm-gc David Daney
16:59 Re: GCC and boehm-gc Andrew Haley
16:46 Re: GCC and boehm-gc NightStrike
16:39 Re: git mirror at gcc.gnu.org Jason Merrill
16:27 Re: GCC and boehm-gc David Daney
16:26 Reorg and renaming registers fearyourself
16:11 GCC and boehm-gc NightStrike
14:37 don't touch fold locations Aldy Hernandez
13:35 Re: VTA merge? Diego Novillo
12:46 strange comment in plugin.c Basile STARYNKEVITCH
12:31 Re: VTA merge? Michael Matz
11:04 Re: VTA merge? Diego Novillo
10:10 Is there any pointers you might have petrov dot gazprom at gmail do
10:00 Re: VTA merge? Paolo Bonzini
09:33 gcc trunk miscompiles binutils Rainer Emrich
08:37 Re: VTA merge? Alexandre Oliva

June 17, 2009
23:47 Re: genrecog: ran out of alphabet DJ Delorie
23:16 Re: genrecog: ran out of alphabet Ian Lance Taylor
22:42 Re: genrecog: ran out of alphabet DJ Delorie
20:21 Re: VTA guality assessment: better than -O0 ;-) Jakub Jelinek
20:15 Re: Registers safe across function calls Dobes
20:06 Registers safe across function calls Dobes
18:26 Faites vous élire Magistrat Juge au Tribunal de C ommerce Olivier Bidou CNDI
15:54 Re: Rationale for an old TRUNCATE patch Ian Lance Taylor
15:26 Re: Rationale for an old TRUNCATE patch Adam Nemet
15:23 Re: gengtype & plugins. Diego Novillo
15:15 gengtype & plugins. Basile STARYNKEVITCH
14:52 Re: Rationale for an old TRUNCATE patch Jeff Law
14:45 Re: 4.3 weekly snapshots bot broken? Joseph S. Myers
14:33 Re: 4.3 weekly snapshots bot broken? Dave Korn
14:30 New plugins repository page Diego Novillo
14:28 Re: 4.3 weekly snapshots bot broken? Ian Lance Taylor
14:26 Re: AVR C++ - how to move vtables into FLASH memory Ian Lance Taylor
14:24 Re: Rationale for an old TRUNCATE patch Ian Lance Taylor
14:18 Re: genrecog: ran out of alphabet Ian Lance Taylor
13:55 Re: 4.3 weekly snapshots bot broken? Dave Korn
13:30 Re: 4.3 weekly snapshots bot broken? Joseph S. Myers
13:19 Re: Address mode offset spill Ian Lance Taylor
11:56 Re: "plugin"-ifying the MELT branch. Basile STARYNKEVITCH
11:35 Re: 4.3 weekly snapshots bot broken? Kai Henningsen
10:49 Re: "plugin"-ifying the MELT branch. Richard Guenther
10:24 Re: Address mode offset spill daniel tian
10:09 Re: 4.3 weekly snapshots bot broken? Joseph S. Myers
10:03 Re: Address mode offset spill daniel tian
09:27 4.3 weekly snapshots bot broken? Mikael Pettersson
08:00 Re: AVR C++ - how to move vtables into FLASH memory Tomasz Francuz
06:42 Re: Rationale for an old TRUNCATE patch Adam Nemet
06:17 Re: Rationale for an old TRUNCATE patch Adam Nemet
04:52 Ping: New Toshiba Media Processor (mep-elf) port and maintainer DJ Delorie
04:51 genrecog: ran out of alphabet DJ Delorie
04:20 Re: [gnat] reuse of ASTs already constructed Oliver Kellogg
04:05 Re: gcc for i386-solaris doesn't expand builtin functions for atomic memory access Ian Lance Taylor
02:52 gcc for i386-solaris doesn't expand builtin functions for atomic memory access Lijuan Hai
02:12 Re: Rationale for an old TRUNCATE patch Jeff Law
02:10 Re: Rationale for an old TRUNCATE patch Jeff Law
01:38 Re: Address mode offset spill daniel tian
00:28 Re: Rationale for an old TRUNCATE patch Ian Lance Taylor
00:25 Re: AVR C++ - how to move vtables into FLASH memory Ian Lance Taylor

June 16, 2009
22:53 gcc-4.4-20090616 is now available gccadmin
22:45 Re: Rationale for an old TRUNCATE patch Adam Nemet
21:29 Re: AVR C++ - how to move vtables into FLASH memory ZoltÃn KÃcsi
19:52 Re: git mirror at gcc.gnu.org Bernie Innocenti
17:41 Re: AVR C++ - how to move vtables into FLASH memory Denis Chertykov
17:33 Re: "plugin"-ifying the MELT branch. Joseph S. Myers
17:30 Re: "plugin"-ifying the MELT branch. Basile STARYNKEVITCH
17:20 Re: "plugin"-ifying the MELT branch. Diego Novillo
17:10 Re: "plugin"-ifying the MELT branch. Janis Johnson
15:42 Re: diagnostics-branch merged into mainline NightStrike
15:17 Re: git mirror at gcc.gnu.org Jason Merrill
14:49 Re: Questions about VAR_DECL and DECL_EXPR Ian Lance Taylor
14:42 Re: Questionable function renaming Jakub Jelinek
14:41 Re: AVR C++ - how to move vtables into FLASH memory Ian Lance Taylor
14:35 Re: Rationale for an old TRUNCATE patch Ian Lance Taylor
14:34 Re: Questionable function renaming Martin Jambor
14:26 Re: Questionable function renaming Richard Guenther
14:24 Re: Help with BLOCK vs BIND_EXPR trees Richard Guenther
14:24 RE: Questionable function renaming Bingfeng Mei
14:21 Re: git mirror at gcc.gnu.org Daniel Berlin
14:17 Re: git mirror at gcc.gnu.org Jason Merrill
14:04 Re: Address mode offset spill Ian Lance Taylor
13:19 Re: Help with BLOCK vs BIND_EXPR trees Jerry Quinn
13:10 Re: "plugin"-ifying the MELT branch. Joseph S. Myers
13:02 Re: Questionable function renaming Richard Guenther
13:01 RE: Questionable function renaming Bingfeng Mei
12:56 Re: Questionable function renaming Richard Guenther
12:53 Re: "plugin"-ifying the MELT branch. Richard Guenther
12:49 Re: Questions about VAR_DECL and DECL_EXPR Richard Guenther
12:43 Re: Help with BLOCK vs BIND_EXPR trees Richard Guenther
12:31 Re: instructions for compiling plugins? Basile STARYNKEVITCH
12:27 Re: diagnostics-branch merged into mainline Dave Korn
12:27 Questionable function renaming Bingfeng Mei
12:22 Re: "plugin"-ifying the MELT branch. Basile STARYNKEVITCH
12:15 Re: diagnostics-branch merged into mainline Rafael Espindola
12:14 Questions about VAR_DECL and DECL_EXPR Jerry Quinn
11:50 Help with BLOCK vs BIND_EXPR trees Jerry Quinn
11:48 Re: instructions for compiling plugins? Rafael Espindola
11:38 Re: diagnostics-branch merged into mainline Dave Korn
11:38 Re: "plugin"-ifying the MELT branch. Joseph S. Myers
11:21 Re: "plugin"-ifying the MELT branch. Basile STARYNKEVITCH
11:16 Re: "plugin"-ifying the MELT branch. Richard Guenther
11:13 Re: "plugin"-ifying the MELT branch. Basile STARYNKEVITCH
11:08 Re: diagnostics-branch merged into mainline Kai Tietz
11:01 Re: diagnostics-branch merged into mainline Rafael Espindola
10:56 Re: diagnostics-branch merged into mainline Kai Tietz
10:49 Re: diagnostics-branch merged into mainline Rafael Espindola
10:25 Re: Address mode offset spill daniel tian
09:51 AVR C++ - how to move vtables into FLASH memory Tomasz Francuz
08:26 instructions for compiling plugins? Basile STARYNKEVITCH
07:16 Re: uint64_t alignof odditity on x86 Ian Lance Taylor
07:12 Rationale for an old TRUNCATE patch Adam Nemet
06:17 uint64_t alignof odditity on x86 Jan Engelhardt

June 15, 2009
23:46 Re: Speed regression (m68k) ami_stuff
23:30 Re: C++0x unrestricted unions Rodolfo Lima
23:25 C++0x unrestricted unions Rodolfo Lima
22:14 Re: Address mode offset spill Jeff Law
22:12 Re: Address mode offset spill Ian Lance Taylor
21:05 Re: Address mode offset spill Jeff Law
20:38 Re: [gnat] reuse of ASTs already constructed Oliver Kellogg
19:19 Re: Speed regression (m68k) Ian Lance Taylor
18:18 Re: diagnostics-branch merged into mainline NightStrike
18:05 Re: diagnostics-branch merged into mainline Aldy Hernandez
17:57 Re: Address mode offset spill Ian Lance Taylor
17:46 Re: i370 port Ulrich Weigand
17:22 Re: git mirror at gcc.gnu.org Bernie Innocenti
16:18 Re: Build report for AIX 6.1 David Edelsohn
16:13 [GSoC] [plugins] [ici] function cloning + fine-grain optimizations/program instrumentation Grigori Fursin
16:02 Re: diagnostics-branch merged into mainline NightStrike
15:18 Re: git mirror at gcc.gnu.org Jason Merrill
14:30 Re: plugin callbacks after compiler errors Basile STARYNKEVITCH
14:28 Re: git mirror at gcc.gnu.org Rafael Espindola
13:53 Re: diagnostics-branch merged into mainline Aldy Hernandez
13:50 Re: mainline breakage (r148442) Aldy Hernandez
13:43 Re: plugin callbacks after compiler errors Diego Novillo
13:32 Re: plugin callbacks after compiler errors Rafael Espindola
11:52 Re: Address mode offset spill Alexandre Oliva
11:19 Re: Pointer analysis in GCC-4.3.0 - Getting spurious pointsTo pair. Richard Guenther
10:33 Pointer analysis in GCC-4.3.0 - Getting spurious pointsTo pair. Seema Ravandale
10:23 Re: tree.c compiler warning Andreas Krebbel
07:17 Re: diagnostics-branch merged into mainline NightStrike
02:38 Re: Regressions with dwarf debugging Michael Meissner

June 14, 2009
21:01 tree.c compiler warning Giuseppe Scrivano
15:17 Re: VTA guality assessment: better than -O0 ;-) Daniel Jacobowitz
14:33 Address mode offset spill daniel tian
03:43 mainline breakage (r148442) Oliver Kellogg
03:14 Regressions with dwarf debugging Steve Kargl

June 13, 2009
20:20 Speed regression (m68k) ami_stuff
20:09 Re: VTA guality assessment: better than -O0 ;-) Jakub Jelinek
19:18 Re: VTA guality assessment: better than -O0 ;-) Alexandre Oliva
18:34 Re: VTA guality assessment: better than -O0 ;-) Eric Botcazou
18:18 Re: VTA guality assessment: better than -O0 ;-) Richard Guenther
17:57 Re: VTA guality assessment: better than -O0 ;-) Eric Botcazou
15:23 Re: VTA guality assessment: better than -O0 ;-) Richard Guenther
07:30 VTA guality assessment: better than -O0 ;-) Alexandre Oliva
02:24 Re: diagnostics-branch merged into mainline Dave Korn
02:16 Re: diagnostics-branch merged into mainline Aldy Hernandez
02:12 Re: diagnostics-branch merged into mainline Aldy Hernandez
02:09 Re: diagnostics-branch merged into mainline Dave Korn
01:52 Re: diagnostics-branch merged into mainline David Edelsohn
01:49 Re: diagnostics-branch merged into mainline Aldy Hernandez
00:39 Re: diagnostics-branch merged into mainline Dave Korn

June 12, 2009
23:12 Re: diagnostics-branch merged into mainline Andrew Pinski
22:13 diagnostics-branch merged into mainline Aldy Hernandez
21:36 Re: Machine Description Template? Michael Meissner
18:47 Re: naked functions on x86 architecture Andrew Haley
17:56 Re: naked functions on x86 architecture Zachary Turner
17:39 Re: naked functions on x86 architecture Andrew Haley
17:25 Re: naked functions on x86 architecture Zachary Turner
16:32 Re: naked functions on x86 architecture Paolo Bonzini
16:20 naked functions on x86 architecture Zachary Turner
07:56 Re: Code optimization only in loops Paolo Bonzini
05:19 Re: git mirror at gcc.gnu.org Jason Merrill

June 11, 2009
22:46 gcc-4.5-20090611 is now available gccadmin
20:55 Re: Code optimization only in loops Jean Christophe Beyler
20:32 Re: Expanding a load instruction Jean Christophe Beyler
17:20 Re: [RFC] enabling -fshow-column by default Jonathan Wakely
14:52 Re: [RFC] enabling -fshow-column by default Aldy Hernandez
14:09 Re: [RFC] enabling -fshow-column by default Jonathan Wakely
13:22 Re: git mirror at gcc.gnu.org Bernie Innocenti
13:18 Re: git mirror at gcc.gnu.org Bernie Innocenti
12:04 Re: git mirror at gcc.gnu.org Daniel Berlin
09:01 Re: Complex numbers in c++0x Paolo Carlini
08:10 Re: Complex numbers in c++0x Gabriel Dos Reis
07:27 Complex numbers in c++0x Marc Steinbach
07:08 Re: git mirror at gcc.gnu.org Bernie Innocenti
06:28 Re: git mirror at infradead? Daniel Berlin
01:44 Re: Please update http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.3/buildstat.html Dennis Clarke
01:38 Re: git mirror at infradead? Jason Merrill

June 10, 2009
20:30 Re: Please update http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.3/buildstat.html Tom Christensen
18:14 Re: Polyhedral Model Tobias Grosser
18:12 Re: increasing the number of GCC reviewers Diego Novillo
17:04 Re: skip_evaluation Gabriel Dos Reis
15:51 Re: skip_evaluation Paolo Bonzini
15:47 RE: increasing the number of GCC reviewers Weddington, Eric
15:46 Re: skip_evaluation Ian Lance Taylor
15:44 Re: AW: AIX link error with g++ 4.4.0 Dave Korn
15:32 Re: AW: AIX link error with g++ 4.4.0 Ian Lance Taylor
15:28 Re: skip_evaluation Paolo Bonzini
15:00 Re: increasing the number of GCC reviewers Joseph S. Myers
15:00 Re: Expanding a load instruction Dave Korn
14:52 RE: increasing the number of GCC reviewers Joseph S. Myers
14:38 Re: increasing the number of GCC reviewers Paolo Bonzini
14:36 Re: Expanding a load instruction Jean Christophe Beyler
14:35 RE: increasing the number of GCC reviewers Weddington, Eric
14:17 Re: Expanding a load instruction Dave Korn
13:43 Re: Expanding a load instruction Jean Christophe Beyler
13:00 Re: opaque vector types? Paul Brook
12:47 Re: increasing the number of GCC reviewers Joseph S. Myers
12:15 Re: increasing the number of GCC reviewers Richard Kenner
11:10 Re: increasing the number of GCC reviewers Joseph S. Myers
10:45 Adding a new Struct (RECORD_TYPE) Petros Panayi
09:26 AW: AIX link error with g++ 4.4.0 Fehringer Franz
08:11 Re: Please update http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.3/buildstat.html Dennis Clarke
07:50 Re: gcc 4.4.0 error at postreload.c:396 Paolo Bonzini
07:45 Re: increasing the number of GCC reviewers Steven Bosscher
07:20 Re: Bootstrap failures on solaris Alexandre Oliva
05:49 Re: New Moxie port and maintainer Anthony Green
05:45 Re: Please update http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.3/buildstat.html Tom Christensen
04:53 Re: sched2, ret, use, and VLIW bundling DJ Delorie
04:38 Re: sched2, ret, use, and VLIW bundling DJ Delorie
02:40 Re: increasing the number of GCC reviewers Daniel Berlin
02:14 Re: plugin callbacks after compiler errors Taras Glek
02:05 Re: increasing the number of GCC reviewers Dave Korn
01:36 Re: increasing the number of GCC reviewers Tom Tromey
01:04 Re: increasing the number of GCC reviewers Ian Lance Taylor
01:02 Re: git mirror at infradead? Angela Marie Thomas
00:59 skip_evaluation Ian Lance Taylor
00:51 Re: increasing the number of GCC reviewers Joseph S. Myers
00:45 Re: increasing the number of GCC reviewers Ben Elliston
00:43 Re: git mirror at infradead? Ian Lance Taylor
00:14 Re: increasing the number of GCC reviewers Ben Elliston
00:12 Re: git mirror at infradead? Daniel Berlin

June 09, 2009
22:52 Re: Bootstrap failures on solaris Jonathan Wakely
22:48 gcc-4.4-20090609 is now available gccadmin
22:24 Re: Expanding a load instruction Dave Korn
22:12 Re: plugin callbacks after compiler errors Diego Novillo
21:37 Re: increasing the number of GCC reviewers Ian Lance Taylor
21:36 Re: increasing the number of GCC reviewers Tom Tromey
21:28 Re: Bootstrap failures on solaris Ian Lance Taylor
21:10 Re: increasing the number of GCC reviewers Gabriel Dos Reis
20:22 Re: increasing the number of GCC reviewers Diego Novillo
20:17 Re: Expanding a load instruction Jean Christophe Beyler
19:45 Re: plugin callbacks after compiler errors Basile STARYNKEVITCH
19:33 plugin callbacks after compiler errors Taras Glek
19:29 Re: increasing the number of GCC reviewers Andrew Haley
19:19 Re: increasing the number of GCC reviewers Joe Buck
19:17 Re: git mirror at infradead? Bernie Innocenti
19:13 Re: increasing the number of GCC reviewers Basile STARYNKEVITCH
18:48 New Moxie port and maintainer Gerald Pfeifer
18:42 Re: increasing the number of GCC reviewers Andrew Haley
18:21 Re: increasing the number of GCC reviewers Richard Guenther
18:10 Re: increasing the number of GCC reviewers Paolo Bonzini
18:10 Re: increasing the number of GCC reviewers Basile STARYNKEVITCH
18:03 RE: Bootstrap failures on solaris Arthur Haas
18:01 Re: increasing the number of GCC reviewers Andrew Haley
17:55 Re: increasing the number of GCC reviewers Adam Nemet
17:31 Re: increasing the number of GCC reviewers Andrew Haley
17:20 Re: increasing the number of GCC reviewers Basile STARYNKEVITCH
17:17 Re: increasing the number of GCC reviewers Basile STARYNKEVITCH
16:45 Re: increasing the number of GCC reviewers Andrew Haley
15:52 increasing the number of GCC reviewers Basile STARYNKEVITCH
15:45 Re: Bootstrap failures on solaris Adam Nemet
15:41 Re: Bootstrap failures on solaris Kaveh R. GHAZI
15:33 Re: Bootstrap failures on solaris Revital1 Eres
15:33 Re: What is -3.I (as opposed to 0-3.I) supposed evaluate to? Richard Guenther
15:26 Re: What is -3.I (as opposed to 0-3.I) supposed evaluate to? Kaveh R. Ghazi
14:36 Bootstrap failures on solaris Art Haas
14:18 Re: git mirror at infradead? Jason Merrill
11:22 Re: What is -3.I (as opposed to 0-3.I) supposed evaluate to? Joseph S. Myers
10:52 Re: several installed gcc, or libdir should depend upon -program-suffix... Gerald Pfeifer
08:57 Re: Machine Description Template? Martin Guy
06:20 several installed gcc, or libdir should depend upon -program-suffix... Basile STARYNKEVITCH
02:08 Re: What is -3.I (as opposed to 0-3.I) supposed evaluate to? Kaveh R. Ghazi
01:15 Re: VTA merge? Alexandre Oliva

June 08, 2009
22:52 Re: New Toshiba Media Processor (mep-elf) port and maintainer DJ Delorie
21:31 Re: VTA merge? Alexandre Oliva
21:30 Re: VTA merge? Joe Buck
21:04 Re: VTA merge? Alexandre Oliva
20:33 Re: What is -3.I (as opposed to 0-3.I) supposed evaluate to? Joseph S. Myers
20:12 What is -3.I (as opposed to 0-3.I) supposed evaluate to? Kaveh R. GHAZI
20:07 Re: error in gfc_simplify_expr Tobias Burnus
18:11 error in gfc_simplify_expr Revital1 Eres
17:41 Please update http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.3/buildstat.html Dennis Clarke
17:39 Re: [fortran] Different FUNC_DECLS with the same DECL_NAME - MAIN__ and named PROGRAM main functions [was Re: gcc-4.5-20090528 is now available] Tobias Burnus
17:35 Re: VTA merge? Diego Novillo
16:19 Re: VTA merge? Frank Ch. Eigler
15:52 Re: [fortran] Different FUNC_DECLS with the same DECL_NAME - MAIN__ and named PROGRAM main functions [was Re: gcc-4.5-20090528 is now available] Dave Korn
14:22 Re: Intermediate representation Ian Lance Taylor
13:28 Re: LLVM as a gcc plugin? Rafael Espindola
13:17 c++0x concepts support Onay Urfalioglu
12:11 Intermediate representation Nicolas COLLIN
12:01 Re: The C++0x lambda branch Maik Beckmann
11:07 Re: Intermediate representation Ian Lance Taylor
10:49 Information Mr Joe Brown
10:49 Information Mr Joe Brown
10:41 Re: LLVM as a gcc plugin? Steven Bosscher
07:55 Re: sched2, ret, use, and VLIW bundling Maxim Kuvyrkov
06:34 Intermediate representation Nicolas COLLIN
06:25 Re: Using MPC Library with GCC Kaveh R. Ghazi
03:04 Having trouble printing the subvars of structs, under certain conditions =?big5?b?w0OnZah8?=
02:49 Re: VTA merge? Eric Botcazou
01:10 Re: LLVM as a gcc plugin? Rafael Espindola

June 07, 2009
22:46 gcc-4.3-20090607 is now available gccadmin
21:55 Re: git mirror at infradead? Daniel Berlin
21:32 Re: VTA merge? Alexandre Oliva
20:04 Re: VTA merge? Alexandre Oliva
17:07 libJIT + GCC integration and PLDI 2009 Kirill Kononenko
12:54 gcc 4.4.0 error at postreload.c:396 Bernd Roesch
12:08 Re: git mirror at infradead? Bernie Innocenti
11:38 Re: git mirror at infradead? Bernie Innocenti
10:40 Re: git mirror at infradead? Ralf Wildenhues
10:18 Re: git mirror at infradead? Bernie Innocenti
05:22 git mirror at infradead? Ralf Wildenhues
00:43 The Linux binutils 2.19.51.0.9 is released. H.J. Lu

June 06, 2009
15:00 Re: i370 port Paul Edwards
08:12 Re: VTA merge? Eric Botcazou
03:34 sched2, ret, use, and VLIW bundling DJ Delorie

June 05, 2009
23:48 Re: Machine Description Template? Jeff Law
22:55 Re: Machine Description Template? Graham Reitz
22:46 Re: Machine Description Template? Michael Hope
22:31 Re: Machine Description Template? Ramana Radhakrishnan
22:11 Machine Description Template? Graham Reitz
21:06 Re: LLVM as a gcc plugin? Joe Buck
20:56 Re: VTA merge? Daniel Berlin
20:54 Re: [RFC] enabling -fshow-column by default Jonathan Wakely
20:52 Re: [RFC] enabling -fshow-column by default Jonathan Wakely
20:45 Re: i370 port Paul Edwards
20:20 Re: i370 port Joseph S. Myers
19:18 Re: VTA merge? Alexandre Oliva
17:03 Re: [RFC] enabling -fshow-column by default Janis Johnson
16:49 Re: LLVM as a gcc plugin? Chris Lattner
16:14 Re: "plugin"-ifying the MELT branch. Tom Tromey
15:57 Re: i370 port Paul Edwards
15:52 Re: i370 port Paul Edwards
15:51 Re: New Toshiba Media Processor (mep-elf) port and maintainer DJ Delorie
15:49 Re: i370 port Daniel Jacobowitz
15:47 Re: i370 port Joseph S. Myers
15:44 Re: i370 port Joseph S. Myers
15:39 Re: i370 port Paul Edwards
15:36 Re: Expanding a load instruction Dave Korn
15:32 Expanding a load instruction fearyourself
15:24 Re: i370 port Paul Edwards
15:21 Re: i370 port Ulrich Weigand
15:18 New Toshiba Media Processor (mep-elf) port and maintainer Gerald Pfeifer
15:03 Re: i370 port Joseph S. Myers
14:57 Re: i370 port Paul Edwards
14:37 Re: [RFC] enabling -fshow-column by default Aldy Hernandez
14:33 Re: i370 port Joseph S. Myers
12:45 i370 port Paul Edwards
12:28 Re: VTA merge? David Edelsohn
11:18 Re: VTA merge? Richard Guenther
11:11 Re: VTA merge? Alexandre Oliva
11:01 [ANN] ForestGOMP 0.1, a libgomp-compatible OpenMP run-time Ludovic Courtès
10:53 Re: VTA merge? Alexandre Oliva
10:43 Re: LLVM as a gcc plugin? Steven Bosscher
10:42 Re: VTA merge? Joseph S. Myers
10:41 Re: LLVM as a gcc plugin? Andrew Nisbet
10:19 Re: VTA merge? Richard Guenther
10:06 VTA merge? Alexandre Oliva
09:55 Re: LLVM as a gcc plugin? Grigori Fursin
09:52 New Interactive Compilation Interface (ICI) v2.0 has been released Zbigniew Chamski
09:30 Open optimization repository updated Grigori Fursin
05:46 Re: Using MPC Library with GCC Allan McRae

June 04, 2009
23:10 Re: [RFC] enabling -fshow-column by default Jonathan Wakely
22:49 gcc-4.5-20090604 is now available gccadmin
22:24 Re: From regno to pseudo? Jeff Law
21:00 Re: STRIP_NOPS and lower-precision/bit-field types Richard Guenther
20:56 Re: LLVM as a gcc plugin? Ian Lance Taylor
20:53 Re: GCC Summit 2010 topic (potentially). Richard Guenther
20:49 Re: STRIP_NOPS and lower-precision/bit-field types Joseph S. Myers
20:15 STRIP_NOPS and lower-precision/bit-field types Adam Nemet
19:25 Re: LLVM as a gcc plugin? Duncan Sands
18:33 "plugin"-ifying the MELT branch. Basile STARYNKEVITCH
17:33 GCC Summit 2010 topic (potentially). Toon Moene
16:12 Re: LLVM as a gcc plugin? Chris Lattner
16:06 Re: LLVM as a gcc plugin? Chris Lattner
11:45 GCC 4.5.0 Status Report (2009-06-04) Richard Guenther
10:33 Re: LLVM as a gcc plugin? Rafael Espindola
10:21 Re: LLVM as a gcc plugin? Steven Bosscher
10:14 Re: LLVM as a gcc plugin? Rafael Espindola
09:57 Re: [4.3] Invalid code or invalid optimisation? Andrew Haley
09:48 Re: [4.3] Invalid code or invalid optimisation? Dave Korn
09:22 Re: [4.3] Invalid code or invalid optimisation? Dave Korn
08:27 Re: [4.3] Invalid code or invalid optimisation? Andrew Haley
07:36 Re: LLVM as a gcc plugin? Duncan Sands
06:59 Re: LLVM as a gcc plugin? Miles Bader
06:39 Re: LLVM as a gcc plugin? Chris Lattner
06:30 LLVM as a gcc plugin? Uros Bizjak
05:33 Help with BLOCK vs BIND_EXPR trees? Jerry Quinn
01:39 [4.3] Invalid code or invalid optimisation? Dave Korn

June 03, 2009
21:36 Re: Problem with init of structure bit fields Stelian Pop
20:07 Re: Problem with init of structure bit fields Ian Lance Taylor
19:32 Re: Problem with init of structure bit fields Stelian Pop
17:49 Problem with init of structure bit fields Stelian Pop
17:15 Re: From regno to pseudo? Adam Nemet
16:00 From regno to pseudo? Steven Bosscher
15:46 Re: Restrict keyword doesn't work correctly in GCC 4.4 Richard Guenther
15:35 RE: Restrict keyword doesn't work correctly in GCC 4.4 Bingfeng Mei
14:09 Re: Restrict keyword doesn't work correctly in GCC 4.4 Richard Guenther
13:36 The Linux binutils 2.19.51.0.8 is released. H.J. Lu
12:42 Re: Auto-import problem Dave Korn
11:02 RE: Restrict keyword doesn't work correctly in GCC 4.4 Bingfeng Mei
10:56 Auto-import problem Piotr Wyderski
10:53 Re: Restrict keyword doesn't work correctly in GCC 4.4 Richard Guenther
10:42 Restrict keyword doesn't work correctly in GCC 4.4 Bingfeng Mei
10:34 Re: Any comment about the replacement of gcc news? Ben Elliston
10:33 Re: Enquiry Vijay
09:55 Re: Using a umulhisi3 Julian Brown
09:39 Using a umulhisi3 Michael Hope
08:33 Any comment about the replacement of gcc news? Eric Fisher
07:40 Re: gcc --help for options which are not warnings or optimizations Nick Clifton
07:04 Re: question about TARGET_MUST_PASS_IN_STACK Ian Lance Taylor
03:35 question about TARGET_MUST_PASS_IN_STACK DJ Delorie
00:39 Information Mr Joe Brown

June 02, 2009
22:53 gcc-4.4-20090602 is now available gccadmin
20:49 Re: RFC: Option handling and PR 37565 Michael Meissner
20:17 [lto] Merged with mainline @147915 Diego Novillo
13:52 Enquiry Vijay Holimath
13:51 Re: gcc --help for options which are not warnings or optimizations Ian Lance Taylor
13:00 Enquiry Vijay Holimath
12:34 Re: gcc --help for options which are not warnings or optimizations Diego Novillo
12:15 Re: Inner loop unable to compute sufficient information during vectorization Ira Rosen
09:38 Re: gcc --help for options which are not warnings or optimizations Nick Clifton
06:34 Re: Link error ....redefinition of...... Tim MÃnchen
06:16 Link error ....redefinition of...... Alex Luya

June 01, 2009
21:22 gcc --help for options which are not warnings or optimizations Ian Lance Taylor
20:21 Re: Fortran-related libgomp failures in case of -fno-openmp Steve Kargl
19:49 Re: Fortran-related libgomp failures in case of -fno-openmp Janis Johnson
18:14 Re: Fortran-related libgomp failures in case of -fno-openmp Steve Kargl
17:59 Fortran-related libgomp failures in case of -fno-openmp Gerald Pfeifer
16:57 The Linux binutils 2.19.51.0.7 is released. H.J. Lu
16:10 Re: Measuring FSF gcc from 4.1.2 to today on various benchmarks. Paolo Bonzini
15:03 Re: Bootstrap broken on darwin / fink Tobias Schlüter
14:20 Re: Bootstrap broken on darwin / fink Jack Howarth
14:03 Re: Problems with sibling calls Georg-Johann Lay
13:27 Re: Bootstrap broken on darwin / fink Tobias Schlüter
13:18 Re: Bootstrap broken on darwin / fink Peter O'Gorman
10:44 Re: Bootstrap broken on darwin / fink Joseph S. Myers
10:08 Bootstrap broken on darwin / fink Tobias Schlüter
09:06 Re: [fortran] Different FUNC_DECLS with the same DECL_NAME - MAIN__ and named PROGRAM main functions [was Re: gcc-4.5-20090528 is now available] Dave Korn
07:01 Re: [fortran] Different FUNC_DECLS with the same DECL_NAME - MAIN__ and named PROGRAM main functions [was Re: gcc-4.5-20090528 is now available] Tobias Burnus
05:24 Having trouble printing the subvars of structs, under certain conditions =?big5?b?w0OnZah8?=
01:10 Re: [fortran] Different FUNC_DECLS with the same DECL_NAME - MAIN__ and named PROGRAM main functions [was Re: gcc-4.5-20090528 is now available] Jerry DeLisle

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:
Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.3