gcc archive
author index for June, 2009

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]

Search: Limit to:

Indexes:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav:	[Browse other archives for this mailing list] [Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

=?big5?b?w0OnZah8?=

2009-06-01 05:24 Having trouble printing the subvars of structs, under certain conditions
2009-06-08 03:04 Having trouble printing the subvars of structs, under certain conditions

田晓南

2009-06-19 08:08 How to deal with unrecognizable RTL code

Manuel López-Ibáñez

2009-06-25 18:11 Re: Should -Wjump-misses-init be in -Wall?
2009-06-25 20:17 Re: Should -Wjump-misses-init be in -Wall?
2009-06-29 14:10 Re: GCC feature req: warn when bitops exceed type size (was: conntrack untracked match is broken)
2009-06-29 21:48 Re: GCC feature req: warn when bitops exceed type size (was: conntrack untracked match is broken)

Tobias Schlüter

2009-06-01 10:08 Bootstrap broken on darwin / fink
2009-06-01 13:27 Re: Bootstrap broken on darwin / fink
2009-06-01 15:03 Re: Bootstrap broken on darwin / fink

ZoltÃn KÃcsi

2009-06-16 21:29 Re: AVR C++ - how to move vtables into FLASH memory

ami_stuff

2009-06-13 20:20 Speed regression (m68k)
2009-06-15 23:46 Re: Speed regression (m68k)

Adam Nemet

2009-06-03 17:15 Re: From regno to pseudo?
2009-06-04 20:15 STRIP_NOPS and lower-precision/bit-field types
2009-06-09 15:45 Re: Bootstrap failures on solaris
2009-06-09 17:55 Re: increasing the number of GCC reviewers
2009-06-16 07:12 Rationale for an old TRUNCATE patch
2009-06-16 22:45 Re: Rationale for an old TRUNCATE patch
2009-06-17 06:17 Re: Rationale for an old TRUNCATE patch
2009-06-17 06:42 Re: Rationale for an old TRUNCATE patch
2009-06-17 15:26 Re: Rationale for an old TRUNCATE patch
2009-06-26 18:18 Re: Phase 1 of gcc-in-cxx now complete
2009-06-27 16:14 Re: Phase 1 of gcc-in-cxx now complete

Alan Modra

2009-06-23 05:43 Re: Should -Wjump-misses-init be in -Wall?

Albert Cohen

2009-06-28 22:24 Re: Register Pressure in Instruction Level Parallelism
2009-06-29 00:03 Re: Register Pressure in Instruction Level Parallelism
2009-06-30 12:05 Re: Register Pressure in Instruction Level Parallelism

Aldy Hernandez

2009-06-05 14:37 Re: [RFC] enabling -fshow-column by default
2009-06-11 14:52 Re: [RFC] enabling -fshow-column by default
2009-06-12 22:13 diagnostics-branch merged into mainline
2009-06-13 01:49 Re: diagnostics-branch merged into mainline
2009-06-13 02:12 Re: diagnostics-branch merged into mainline
2009-06-13 02:16 Re: diagnostics-branch merged into mainline
2009-06-15 13:50 Re: mainline breakage (r148442)
2009-06-15 13:53 Re: diagnostics-branch merged into mainline
2009-06-15 18:05 Re: diagnostics-branch merged into mainline
2009-06-18 14:37 don't touch fold locations

Alex Luya

2009-06-02 06:16 Link error ....redefinition of......

Alexander Monakov

2009-06-26 10:38 Re: (known?) Issue with bitmap iterators
2009-06-26 19:24 Re: (known?) Issue with bitmap iterators

Alexandre Oliva

2009-06-05 10:06 VTA merge?
2009-06-05 10:53 Re: VTA merge?
2009-06-05 11:11 Re: VTA merge?
2009-06-05 19:18 Re: VTA merge?
2009-06-07 20:04 Re: VTA merge?
2009-06-07 21:32 Re: VTA merge?
2009-06-08 21:04 Re: VTA merge?
2009-06-08 21:31 Re: VTA merge?
2009-06-09 01:15 Re: VTA merge?
2009-06-10 07:20 Re: Bootstrap failures on solaris
2009-06-13 07:30 VTA guality assessment: better than -O0 ;-)
2009-06-13 19:18 Re: VTA guality assessment: better than -O0 ;-)
2009-06-15 11:52 Re: Address mode offset spill
2009-06-18 08:37 Re: VTA merge?
2009-06-18 20:58 Re: VTA merge?
2009-06-21 05:01 Re: VTA merge?

Allan McRae

2009-06-05 05:46 Re: Using MPC Library with GCC

Andreas Krebbel

2009-06-15 10:23 Re: tree.c compiler warning

Andrew Nisbet

2009-06-05 10:41 Re: LLVM as a gcc plugin?

Andrew Haley

2009-06-04 08:27 Re: [4.3] Invalid code or invalid optimisation?
2009-06-04 09:57 Re: [4.3] Invalid code or invalid optimisation?
2009-06-09 16:45 Re: increasing the number of GCC reviewers
2009-06-09 17:31 Re: increasing the number of GCC reviewers
2009-06-09 18:01 Re: increasing the number of GCC reviewers
2009-06-09 18:42 Re: increasing the number of GCC reviewers
2009-06-09 19:29 Re: increasing the number of GCC reviewers
2009-06-12 17:39 Re: naked functions on x86 architecture
2009-06-12 18:47 Re: naked functions on x86 architecture
2009-06-18 16:59 Re: GCC and boehm-gc
2009-06-18 18:03 Re: GCC and boehm-gc
2009-06-18 19:19 Re: GCC and boehm-gc
2009-06-19 09:13 Re: gcj build issues.
2009-06-22 17:53 Re: gcc 4.3.2 vectorizes access to volatile array
2009-06-22 19:20 Re: gcc 4.3.2 vectorizes access to volatile array
2009-06-23 09:33 Re: gcc 4.3.2 vectorizes access to volatile array
2009-06-29 10:52 Re: Phase 1 of gcc-in-cxx now complete
2009-06-30 16:38 Re: Submitting patches for FreeBSD amd64

Andrew MacLeod

2009-06-22 14:27 Re: (known?) Issue with bitmap iterators

Andrew Pinski

2009-06-12 23:12 Re: diagnostics-branch merged into mainline
2009-06-24 03:52 Re: Basic frontend question about layout

Angela Marie Thomas

2009-06-10 01:02 Re: git mirror at infradead?

Angelo Graziosi

2009-06-26 10:47 Failure building current 4.5 snapshot on Cygwin
2009-06-26 11:42 Re: Failure building current 4.5 snapshot on Cygwin
2009-06-26 16:51 Re: Failure building current 4.5 snapshot on Cygwin

Anthony Green

2009-06-10 05:49 Re: New Moxie port and maintainer

Arnaud Charlet

2009-06-26 14:48 Re: Phase 1 of gcc-in-cxx now complete (Ada)
2009-06-26 17:32 Re: Phase 1 of gcc-in-cxx now complete (Ada)
2009-06-26 17:38 Re: Phase 1 of gcc-in-cxx now complete (Ada)
2009-06-26 19:24 Re: Phase 1 of gcc-in-cxx now complete (Ada)

Art Haas

2009-06-09 14:36 Bootstrap failures on solaris

Arthur Haas

2009-06-09 18:03 RE: Bootstrap failures on solaris

Basile STARYNKEVITCH

2009-06-04 18:33 "plugin"-ifying the MELT branch.
2009-06-09 06:20 several installed gcc, or libdir should depend upon -program-suffix...
2009-06-09 15:52 increasing the number of GCC reviewers
2009-06-09 17:17 Re: increasing the number of GCC reviewers
2009-06-09 17:20 Re: increasing the number of GCC reviewers
2009-06-09 18:10 Re: increasing the number of GCC reviewers
2009-06-09 19:13 Re: increasing the number of GCC reviewers
2009-06-09 19:45 Re: plugin callbacks after compiler errors
2009-06-15 14:30 Re: plugin callbacks after compiler errors
2009-06-16 08:26 instructions for compiling plugins?
2009-06-16 11:13 Re: "plugin"-ifying the MELT branch.
2009-06-16 11:21 Re: "plugin"-ifying the MELT branch.
2009-06-16 12:22 Re: "plugin"-ifying the MELT branch.
2009-06-16 12:31 Re: instructions for compiling plugins?
2009-06-16 17:30 Re: "plugin"-ifying the MELT branch.
2009-06-17 11:56 Re: "plugin"-ifying the MELT branch.
2009-06-17 15:15 gengtype & plugins.
2009-06-18 12:46 strange comment in plugin.c
2009-06-20 06:27 Re: Should -Wjump-misses-init be in -Wall?
2009-06-22 11:20 plugins directory?
2009-06-23 05:48 Re: plugins directory?
2009-06-30 15:16 Questions on exported plugin headers: minimal or full?

Ben Elliston

2009-06-03 10:34 Re: Any comment about the replacement of gcc news?
2009-06-10 00:14 Re: increasing the number of GCC reviewers
2009-06-10 00:45 Re: increasing the number of GCC reviewers

Bernd Roesch

2009-06-07 12:54 gcc 4.4.0 error at postreload.c:396
2009-06-23 14:25 -funswitch-loops slowdown.is it possible to change settings in backend ?

Bernie Innocenti

2009-06-07 10:18 Re: git mirror at infradead?
2009-06-07 11:38 Re: git mirror at infradead?
2009-06-07 12:08 Re: git mirror at infradead?
2009-06-09 19:17 Re: git mirror at infradead?
2009-06-11 07:08 Re: git mirror at gcc.gnu.org
2009-06-11 13:18 Re: git mirror at gcc.gnu.org
2009-06-11 13:22 Re: git mirror at gcc.gnu.org
2009-06-15 17:22 Re: git mirror at gcc.gnu.org
2009-06-16 19:52 Re: git mirror at gcc.gnu.org
2009-06-20 08:38 Re: git mirror at gcc.gnu.org

Bingfeng Mei

2009-06-03 10:42 Restrict keyword doesn't work correctly in GCC 4.4
2009-06-03 11:02 RE: Restrict keyword doesn't work correctly in GCC 4.4
2009-06-03 15:35 RE: Restrict keyword doesn't work correctly in GCC 4.4
2009-06-16 12:27 Questionable function renaming
2009-06-16 13:01 RE: Questionable function renaming
2009-06-16 14:24 RE: Questionable function renaming
2009-06-22 14:10 Unnecessary regmoves in modulo scheduler?
2009-06-23 13:48 RE: Unnecessary regmoves in modulo scheduler?

Brian O'Mahoney

2009-06-21 01:14 Re: gcc Digest 20 Jun 2009 16:26:41 -0000 Issue 5996

Brice Dobry

2009-06-29 23:38 Re: Base register restrictions

Bryce

2009-06-26 15:59 Problem on Front-End List Page

2009-06-30 19:11 ID CF 300609216222

Chris Lattner

2009-06-04 06:39 Re: LLVM as a gcc plugin?
2009-06-04 16:06 Re: LLVM as a gcc plugin?
2009-06-04 16:12 Re: LLVM as a gcc plugin?
2009-06-05 16:49 Re: LLVM as a gcc plugin?
2009-06-28 18:53 GCC Summit proceedings?

Daniel Berlin

2009-06-05 20:56 Re: VTA merge?
2009-06-07 21:55 Re: git mirror at infradead?
2009-06-10 00:12 Re: git mirror at infradead?
2009-06-10 02:40 Re: increasing the number of GCC reviewers
2009-06-11 06:28 Re: git mirror at infradead?
2009-06-11 12:04 Re: git mirror at gcc.gnu.org
2009-06-16 14:21 Re: git mirror at gcc.gnu.org
2009-06-22 02:44 Re: (known?) Issue with bitmap iterators
2009-06-25 13:09 Re: (known?) Issue with bitmap iterators
2009-06-27 13:39 Re: Phase 1 of gcc-in-cxx now complete

Daniel Jacobowitz

2009-06-05 15:49 Re: i370 port
2009-06-14 15:17 Re: VTA guality assessment: better than -O0 ;-)

daniel tian

2009-06-14 14:33 Address mode offset spill
2009-06-16 10:25 Re: Address mode offset spill
2009-06-17 01:38 Re: Address mode offset spill
2009-06-17 10:03 Re: Address mode offset spill
2009-06-17 10:24 Re: Address mode offset spill
2009-06-24 10:16 Re: How to deal with unrecognizable RTL code
2009-06-26 03:28 Re: Address mode offset spill
2009-06-26 03:34 Re: Address mode offset spill
2009-06-26 07:22 About machine.md in insight-gdb debug

daniel.tian

2009-06-22 01:56 re: How to deal with unrecognizable RTL code
2009-06-24 08:56 re: How to deal with unrecognizable RTL code
2009-06-29 09:41 答复: How to deal with unrecognizable RTL co de
2009-06-29 09:54 Re:How to deal with unrecognizable RTL code
2009-06-30 06:20 RE: How to deal with unrecognizable RTL code

Dave Hudson

2009-06-24 16:22 Any ideas how to get the IRA to choose one subclass of registers over another in the same cover class?
2009-06-26 14:33 Re: Any ideas how to get the IRA to choose one subclass of registers over another in the same cover class?

Dave Korn

2009-06-01 09:06 Re: [fortran] Different FUNC_DECLS with the same DECL_NAME - MAIN__ and named PROGRAM main functions [was Re: gcc-4.5-20090528 is now available]
2009-06-03 12:42 Re: Auto-import problem
2009-06-04 01:39 [4.3] Invalid code or invalid optimisation?
2009-06-04 09:22 Re: [4.3] Invalid code or invalid optimisation?
2009-06-04 09:48 Re: [4.3] Invalid code or invalid optimisation?
2009-06-05 15:36 Re: Expanding a load instruction
2009-06-08 15:52 Re: [fortran] Different FUNC_DECLS with the same DECL_NAME - MAIN__ and named PROGRAM main functions [was Re: gcc-4.5-20090528 is now available]
2009-06-09 22:24 Re: Expanding a load instruction
2009-06-10 02:05 Re: increasing the number of GCC reviewers
2009-06-10 14:17 Re: Expanding a load instruction
2009-06-10 15:00 Re: Expanding a load instruction
2009-06-10 15:44 Re: AW: AIX link error with g++ 4.4.0
2009-06-13 00:39 Re: diagnostics-branch merged into mainline
2009-06-13 02:09 Re: diagnostics-branch merged into mainline
2009-06-13 02:24 Re: diagnostics-branch merged into mainline
2009-06-16 11:38 Re: diagnostics-branch merged into mainline
2009-06-16 12:27 Re: diagnostics-branch merged into mainline
2009-06-17 13:55 Re: 4.3 weekly snapshots bot broken?
2009-06-17 14:33 Re: 4.3 weekly snapshots bot broken?
2009-06-19 00:51 Re: gcj build issues.
2009-06-22 11:21 Re: How to deal with unrecognizable RTL code
2009-06-22 11:33 Re: (known?) Issue with bitmap iterators
2009-06-22 13:06 Re: (known?) Issue with bitmap iterators
2009-06-22 19:03 Re: (known?) Issue with bitmap iterators
2009-06-22 19:07 Re: (known?) Issue with bitmap iterators
2009-06-23 14:41 [OTish] Proving compiler algorithms implement same semantics as language specs? [was Re: [PATCH][RFC] Re-implement restrict support]
2009-06-23 23:37 Re: Question about dead_or_predicable
2009-06-24 02:45 Things in specs vs. things explicit in the generated source [was Re: [PATCH] Pass -mtune and -march options to assembler.]
2009-06-24 09:35 Re: How to deal with unrecognizable RTL code
2009-06-24 09:37 Re: How to deal with unrecognizable RTL code
2009-06-25 22:38 Re: (known?) Issue with bitmap iterators
2009-06-26 11:20 Re: Failure building current 4.5 snapshot on Cygwin
2009-06-28 12:37 Re: Register Pressure in Instruction Level Parallelism
2009-06-28 23:00 Re: Register Pressure in Instruction Level Parallelism
2009-06-28 23:01 Re: Register Pressure in Instruction Level Parallelism
2009-06-30 16:46 Re: Failure building trunk on cygwin

David Daney

2009-06-18 16:27 Re: GCC and boehm-gc
2009-06-18 17:08 Re: GCC and boehm-gc
2009-06-18 17:17 Re: GCC and boehm-gc

David Edelsohn

2009-06-05 12:28 Re: VTA merge?
2009-06-13 01:52 Re: diagnostics-branch merged into mainline
2009-06-15 16:18 Re: Build report for AIX 6.1
2009-06-22 12:59 Re: an opencl to ati stream converter
2009-06-27 16:51 Re: Phase 1 of gcc-in-cxx now complete
2009-06-30 14:22 Re: BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT vs g++ compat test expectation on aix ?
2009-06-30 15:14 Tobias Grosser appointed Graphite maintainer

Denis Chertykov

2009-06-16 17:41 Re: AVR C++ - how to move vtables into FLASH memory

Dennis Clarke

2009-06-08 17:41 Please update http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.3/buildstat.html
2009-06-10 08:11 Re: Please update http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.3/buildstat.html
2009-06-11 01:44 Re: Please update http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.3/buildstat.html

Diego Novillo

2009-06-02 12:34 Re: gcc --help for options which are not warnings or optimizations
2009-06-02 20:17 [lto] Merged with mainline @147915
2009-06-08 17:35 Re: VTA merge?
2009-06-09 20:22 Re: increasing the number of GCC reviewers
2009-06-09 22:12 Re: plugin callbacks after compiler errors
2009-06-10 18:12 Re: increasing the number of GCC reviewers
2009-06-15 13:43 Re: plugin callbacks after compiler errors
2009-06-16 17:20 Re: "plugin"-ifying the MELT branch.
2009-06-17 14:30 New plugins repository page
2009-06-17 15:23 Re: gengtype & plugins.
2009-06-18 11:04 Re: VTA merge?
2009-06-18 13:35 Re: VTA merge?
2009-06-24 12:42 Re: plugins directory?

DJ Delorie

2009-06-03 03:35 question about TARGET_MUST_PASS_IN_STACK
2009-06-05 15:51 Re: New Toshiba Media Processor (mep-elf) port and maintainer
2009-06-06 03:34 sched2, ret, use, and VLIW bundling
2009-06-08 22:52 Re: New Toshiba Media Processor (mep-elf) port and maintainer
2009-06-10 04:38 Re: sched2, ret, use, and VLIW bundling
2009-06-10 04:53 Re: sched2, ret, use, and VLIW bundling
2009-06-17 04:51 genrecog: ran out of alphabet
2009-06-17 04:52 Ping: New Toshiba Media Processor (mep-elf) port and maintainer
2009-06-17 22:42 Re: genrecog: ran out of alphabet
2009-06-17 23:47 Re: genrecog: ran out of alphabet
2009-06-19 01:32 Re: Ping: New Toshiba Media Processor (mep-elf) port and maintainer

Dobes

2009-06-17 20:06 Registers safe across function calls
2009-06-17 20:15 Re: Registers safe across function calls
2009-06-29 18:38 Base register restrictions

Duncan Sands

2009-06-04 07:36 Re: LLVM as a gcc plugin?
2009-06-04 19:25 Re: LLVM as a gcc plugin?

Edward Peschko

2009-06-18 22:53 gcj build issues.

Eric Botcazou

2009-06-06 08:12 Re: VTA merge?
2009-06-08 02:49 Re: VTA merge?
2009-06-13 17:57 Re: VTA guality assessment: better than -O0 ;-)
2009-06-13 18:34 Re: VTA guality assessment: better than -O0 ;-)
2009-06-24 07:06 Re: Basic frontend question about layout
2009-06-25 22:39 Re: Phase 1 of gcc-in-cxx now complete
2009-06-27 10:35 Re: Phase 1 of gcc-in-cxx now complete (Ada)
2009-06-27 11:24 Re: Phase 1 of gcc-in-cxx now complete (Ada)

Eric Fisher

2009-06-03 08:33 Any comment about the replacement of gcc news?

fearyourself

2009-06-05 15:32 Expanding a load instruction
2009-06-18 16:26 Reorg and renaming registers
2009-06-18 17:37 Re: Reorg and renaming registers

Fehringer Franz

2009-06-10 09:26 AW: AIX link error with g++ 4.4.0

Frank Ch. Eigler

2009-06-08 16:19 Re: VTA merge?

Gabriel Dos Reis

2009-06-09 21:10 Re: increasing the number of GCC reviewers
2009-06-10 17:04 Re: skip_evaluation
2009-06-11 08:10 Re: Complex numbers in c++0x
2009-06-20 14:28 Re: Should -Wjump-misses-init be in -Wall?
2009-06-20 14:32 Re: Should -Wjump-misses-init be in -Wall?
2009-06-20 16:26 Re: Should -Wjump-misses-init be in -Wall?
2009-06-23 04:10 Re: Should -Wjump-misses-init be in -Wall?
2009-06-23 07:35 Re: Should -Wjump-misses-init be in -Wall?
2009-06-23 16:33 Re: Should -Wjump-misses-init be in -Wall?
2009-06-26 06:33 Re: Phase 1 of gcc-in-cxx now complete
2009-06-29 14:23 Re: Phase 1 of gcc-in-cxx now complete

gcc

2009-06-30 16:36 Submitting patches for FreeBSD amd64

gccadmin

2009-06-02 22:53 gcc-4.4-20090602 is now available
2009-06-04 22:49 gcc-4.5-20090604 is now available
2009-06-07 22:46 gcc-4.3-20090607 is now available
2009-06-09 22:48 gcc-4.4-20090609 is now available
2009-06-11 22:46 gcc-4.5-20090611 is now available
2009-06-16 22:53 gcc-4.4-20090616 is now available
2009-06-18 22:44 gcc-4.5-20090618 is now available
2009-06-21 22:46 gcc-4.3-20090621 is now available
2009-06-23 22:50 gcc-4.4-20090623 is now available
2009-06-25 22:51 gcc-4.5-20090625 is now available
2009-06-28 22:45 gcc-4.3-20090628 is now available
2009-06-30 22:55 gcc-4.4-20090630 is now available

Georg-Johann Lay

2009-06-01 14:03 Re: Problems with sibling calls

Gerald Pfeifer

2009-06-01 17:59 Fortran-related libgomp failures in case of -fno-openmp
2009-06-05 15:18 New Toshiba Media Processor (mep-elf) port and maintainer
2009-06-09 10:52 Re: several installed gcc, or libdir should depend upon -program-suffix...
2009-06-09 18:48 New Moxie port and maintainer
2009-06-18 18:05 Re: VTA merge?
2009-06-20 15:52 Re: Should -Wjump-misses-init be in -Wall?
2009-06-20 17:36 Re: Ping: New Toshiba Media Processor (mep-elf) port and maintainer

Giuseppe Scrivano

2009-06-14 21:01 tree.c compiler warning

Graham Reitz

2009-06-05 22:11 Machine Description Template?
2009-06-05 22:55 Re: Machine Description Template?

Grigori Fursin

2009-06-05 09:30 Open optimization repository updated
2009-06-05 09:55 Re: LLVM as a gcc plugin?
2009-06-15 16:13 [GSoC] [plugins] [ici] function cloning + fine-grain optimizations/program instrumentation

H.J. Lu

2009-06-01 16:57 The Linux binutils 2.19.51.0.7 is released.
2009-06-03 13:36 The Linux binutils 2.19.51.0.8 is released.
2009-06-07 00:43 The Linux binutils 2.19.51.0.9 is released.
2009-06-18 21:39 The Linux binutils 2.19.51.0.10 is released.
2009-06-20 13:18 Re: Should -Wjump-misses-init be in -Wall?
2009-06-20 13:58 Re: Should -Wjump-misses-init be in -Wall?
2009-06-22 18:27 Re: gcc 4.3.2 vectorizes access to volatile array
2009-06-27 22:15 The Linux binutils 2.19.51.0.11 is released

Hans Boehm

2009-06-18 21:16 Re: GCC and boehm-gc

Ian Lance Taylor

2009-06-01 21:22 gcc --help for options which are not warnings or optimizations
2009-06-02 13:51 Re: gcc --help for options which are not warnings or optimizations
2009-06-03 07:04 Re: question about TARGET_MUST_PASS_IN_STACK
2009-06-03 20:07 Re: Problem with init of structure bit fields
2009-06-04 20:56 Re: LLVM as a gcc plugin?
2009-06-08 11:07 Re: Intermediate representation
2009-06-08 14:22 Re: Intermediate representation
2009-06-09 21:28 Re: Bootstrap failures on solaris
2009-06-09 21:37 Re: increasing the number of GCC reviewers
2009-06-10 00:43 Re: git mirror at infradead?
2009-06-10 00:59 skip_evaluation
2009-06-10 01:04 Re: increasing the number of GCC reviewers
2009-06-10 15:32 Re: AW: AIX link error with g++ 4.4.0
2009-06-10 15:46 Re: skip_evaluation
2009-06-15 17:57 Re: Address mode offset spill
2009-06-15 19:19 Re: Speed regression (m68k)
2009-06-15 22:12 Re: Address mode offset spill
2009-06-16 07:16 Re: uint64_t alignof odditity on x86
2009-06-16 14:04 Re: Address mode offset spill
2009-06-16 14:35 Re: Rationale for an old TRUNCATE patch
2009-06-16 14:41 Re: AVR C++ - how to move vtables into FLASH memory
2009-06-16 14:49 Re: Questions about VAR_DECL and DECL_EXPR
2009-06-17 00:25 Re: AVR C++ - how to move vtables into FLASH memory
2009-06-17 00:28 Re: Rationale for an old TRUNCATE patch
2009-06-17 04:05 Re: gcc for i386-solaris doesn't expand builtin functions for atomic memory access
2009-06-17 13:19 Re: Address mode offset spill
2009-06-17 14:18 Re: genrecog: ran out of alphabet
2009-06-17 14:24 Re: Rationale for an old TRUNCATE patch
2009-06-17 14:26 Re: AVR C++ - how to move vtables into FLASH memory
2009-06-17 14:28 Re: 4.3 weekly snapshots bot broken?
2009-06-17 15:54 Re: Rationale for an old TRUNCATE patch
2009-06-17 23:16 Re: genrecog: ran out of alphabet
2009-06-20 05:13 Should -Wjump-misses-init be in -Wall?
2009-06-20 07:02 Re: Should -Wjump-misses-init be in -Wall?
2009-06-20 07:04 Re: Should -Wjump-misses-init be in -Wall?
2009-06-21 03:39 Re: Should -Wjump-misses-init be in -Wall?
2009-06-23 18:41 Re: Should -Wjump-misses-init be in -Wall?
2009-06-23 22:20 Re: TEMPLATE_PARM_PARAMETER_PACK redundant check in find_parameter_packs_r
2009-06-25 20:32 Phase 1 of gcc-in-cxx now complete
2009-06-25 22:29 Re: Phase 1 of gcc-in-cxx now complete (Ada)
2009-06-25 22:49 Re: Phase 1 of gcc-in-cxx now complete (Ada)
2009-06-26 14:44 Re: Phase 1 of gcc-in-cxx now complete (Ada)
2009-06-26 17:29 Re: Phase 1 of gcc-in-cxx now complete (Ada)
2009-06-26 17:59 Re: Phase 1 of gcc-in-cxx now complete (Ada)
2009-06-26 19:28 Re: unsigned integer wrap 'trap'.
2009-06-26 19:52 Re: Phase 1 of gcc-in-cxx now complete (Ada)
2009-06-27 00:55 Re: Phase 1 of gcc-in-cxx now complete
2009-06-27 22:25 Re: Phase 1 of gcc-in-cxx now complete
2009-06-29 20:40 Re: Exploring gcc-in-cxx compiler build requirements
2009-06-29 21:04 Re: How to deal with unrecognizable RTL code
2009-06-29 21:09 Re: PR 23296: Strange -O3 -finstrument-functions behaviour
2009-06-29 21:11 Re: Base register restrictions

Ira Rosen

2009-06-02 12:15 Re: Inner loop unable to compute sufficient information during vectorization

Jack Howarth

2009-06-01 14:20 Re: Bootstrap broken on darwin / fink
2009-06-26 13:52 Re: Phase 1 of gcc-in-cxx now complete

Jakub Jelinek

2009-06-13 20:09 Re: VTA guality assessment: better than -O0 ;-)
2009-06-16 14:42 Re: Questionable function renaming
2009-06-17 20:21 Re: VTA guality assessment: better than -O0 ;-)

James Dennett

2009-06-20 13:50 Re: Should -Wjump-misses-init be in -Wall?
2009-06-20 14:06 Re: Should -Wjump-misses-init be in -Wall?

Jan Engelhardt

2009-06-16 06:17 uint64_t alignof odditity on x86
2009-06-29 13:10 GCC feature req: warn when bitops exceed type size (was: conntrack untracked match is broken)
2009-06-29 18:30 Re: GCC feature req: warn when bitops exceed type size (was: conntrack untracked match is broken)

Janis Johnson

2009-06-01 19:49 Re: Fortran-related libgomp failures in case of -fno-openmp
2009-06-05 17:03 Re: [RFC] enabling -fshow-column by default
2009-06-16 17:10 Re: "plugin"-ifying the MELT branch.

Jason Merrill

2009-06-09 14:18 Re: git mirror at infradead?
2009-06-11 01:38 Re: git mirror at infradead?
2009-06-12 05:19 Re: git mirror at gcc.gnu.org
2009-06-15 15:18 Re: git mirror at gcc.gnu.org
2009-06-16 14:17 Re: git mirror at gcc.gnu.org
2009-06-16 15:17 Re: git mirror at gcc.gnu.org
2009-06-18 16:39 Re: git mirror at gcc.gnu.org
2009-06-20 03:00 Re: git mirror at gcc.gnu.org
2009-06-22 15:42 Re: git mirror at gcc.gnu.org

Jean Christophe Beyler

2009-06-09 20:17 Re: Expanding a load instruction
2009-06-10 13:43 Re: Expanding a load instruction
2009-06-10 14:36 Re: Expanding a load instruction
2009-06-11 20:32 Re: Expanding a load instruction
2009-06-11 20:55 Re: Code optimization only in loops

Jeff Law

2009-06-04 22:24 Re: From regno to pseudo?
2009-06-05 23:48 Re: Machine Description Template?
2009-06-15 21:05 Re: Address mode offset spill
2009-06-15 22:14 Re: Address mode offset spill
2009-06-17 02:10 Re: Rationale for an old TRUNCATE patch
2009-06-17 02:12 Re: Rationale for an old TRUNCATE patch
2009-06-17 14:52 Re: Rationale for an old TRUNCATE patch
2009-06-20 14:53 Re: Should -Wjump-misses-init be in -Wall?
2009-06-20 14:53 (known?) Issue with bitmap iterators
2009-06-22 17:06 Re: (known?) Issue with bitmap iterators
2009-06-25 18:18 Re: Any ideas how to get the IRA to choose one subclass of registers over another in the same cover class?
2009-06-25 18:24 Re: (known?) Issue with bitmap iterators
2009-06-25 18:37 Re: How to deal with unrecognizable RTL code
2009-06-25 18:43 Re: How to deal with unrecognizable RTL code
2009-06-25 20:15 Re: Address mode offset spill
2009-06-25 20:24 Re: Address mode offset spill
2009-06-25 20:33 Re: Address mode offset spill

Jerry DeLisle

2009-06-01 01:10 Re: [fortran] Different FUNC_DECLS with the same DECL_NAME - MAIN__ and named PROGRAM main functions [was Re: gcc-4.5-20090528 is now available]

Jerry Quinn

2009-06-04 05:33 Help with BLOCK vs BIND_EXPR trees?
2009-06-16 11:50 Help with BLOCK vs BIND_EXPR trees
2009-06-16 12:14 Questions about VAR_DECL and DECL_EXPR
2009-06-16 13:19 Re: Help with BLOCK vs BIND_EXPR trees
2009-06-24 03:48 Basic frontend question about layout
2009-06-24 04:18 Re: Basic frontend question about layout
2009-06-28 03:09 Exploring gcc-in-cxx compiler build requirements

Jim Wilson

2009-06-30 02:08 Re: How to deal with unrecognizable RTL code
2009-06-30 02:24 Re: Base register restrictions

Joe Buck

2009-06-05 21:06 Re: LLVM as a gcc plugin?
2009-06-08 21:30 Re: VTA merge?
2009-06-09 19:19 Re: increasing the number of GCC reviewers
2009-06-22 17:46 Re: (known?) Issue with bitmap iterators
2009-06-23 00:18 Re: Should -Wjump-misses-init be in -Wall?
2009-06-23 16:12 Re: Should -Wjump-misses-init be in -Wall?
2009-06-23 16:46 Re: Should -Wjump-misses-init be in -Wall?
2009-06-25 22:47 Re: Phase 1 of gcc-in-cxx now complete
2009-06-26 16:15 Re: Problem on Front-End List Page
2009-06-26 16:36 Re: (known?) Issue with bitmap iterators

Jonathan Wakely

2009-06-04 23:10 Re: [RFC] enabling -fshow-column by default
2009-06-05 20:52 Re: [RFC] enabling -fshow-column by default
2009-06-05 20:54 Re: [RFC] enabling -fshow-column by default
2009-06-09 22:52 Re: Bootstrap failures on solaris
2009-06-11 14:09 Re: [RFC] enabling -fshow-column by default
2009-06-11 17:20 Re: [RFC] enabling -fshow-column by default
2009-06-23 22:00 Re: [gnu.org #456639] broken link in libstdc++ manual online
2009-06-30 17:59 Re: howto configure so that CFLAGS='-g3 -O0' in gcc/Makefile?

Joseph S. Myers

2009-06-01 10:44 Re: Bootstrap broken on darwin / fink
2009-06-04 20:49 Re: STRIP_NOPS and lower-precision/bit-field types
2009-06-05 10:42 Re: VTA merge?
2009-06-05 14:33 Re: i370 port
2009-06-05 15:03 Re: i370 port
2009-06-05 15:44 Re: i370 port
2009-06-05 15:47 Re: i370 port
2009-06-05 20:20 Re: i370 port
2009-06-08 20:33 Re: What is -3.I (as opposed to 0-3.I) supposed evaluate to?
2009-06-09 11:22 Re: What is -3.I (as opposed to 0-3.I) supposed evaluate to?
2009-06-10 00:51 Re: increasing the number of GCC reviewers
2009-06-10 11:10 Re: increasing the number of GCC reviewers
2009-06-10 12:47 Re: increasing the number of GCC reviewers
2009-06-10 14:52 RE: increasing the number of GCC reviewers
2009-06-10 15:00 Re: increasing the number of GCC reviewers
2009-06-16 11:38 Re: "plugin"-ifying the MELT branch.
2009-06-16 13:10 Re: "plugin"-ifying the MELT branch.
2009-06-16 17:33 Re: "plugin"-ifying the MELT branch.
2009-06-17 10:09 Re: 4.3 weekly snapshots bot broken?
2009-06-17 13:30 Re: 4.3 weekly snapshots bot broken?
2009-06-17 14:45 Re: 4.3 weekly snapshots bot broken?
2009-06-19 22:01 Re: [plugins] language makefiles and installing cp/ headers
2009-06-23 15:14 Re: [OTish] Proving compiler algorithms implement same semantics as language specs? [was Re: [PATCH][RFC] Re-implement restrict support]
2009-06-25 22:19 Re: Phase 1 of gcc-in-cxx now complete
2009-06-28 11:59 Re: Updating Autoconf and Automake versions used in GCC and src
2009-06-30 19:22 Re: Updating fixed-point support for new C constant expression handling

Julian Brown

2009-06-03 09:55 Re: Using a umulhisi3

Kai Henningsen

2009-06-17 11:35 Re: 4.3 weekly snapshots bot broken?

Kai Tietz

2009-06-16 10:56 Re: diagnostics-branch merged into mainline
2009-06-16 11:08 Re: diagnostics-branch merged into mainline
2009-06-26 13:19 Re: Failure building current 4.5 snapshot on Cygwin
2009-06-26 16:17 Re: Failure building current 4.5 snapshot on Cygwin

Kaveh R. Ghazi

2009-06-08 06:25 Re: Using MPC Library with GCC
2009-06-08 20:12 What is -3.I (as opposed to 0-3.I) supposed evaluate to?
2009-06-09 02:08 Re: What is -3.I (as opposed to 0-3.I) supposed evaluate to?
2009-06-09 15:26 Re: What is -3.I (as opposed to 0-3.I) supposed evaluate to?
2009-06-09 15:41 Re: Bootstrap failures on solaris
2009-06-22 23:51 Re: Should -Wjump-misses-init be in -Wall?

Kenneth Zadeck

2009-06-29 00:30 Re: Fwd: Register Pressure in Instruction Level Parallelism

kernel mailz

2009-06-27 19:50 Inline Assembly queries

Kirill Kononenko

2009-06-07 17:07 libJIT + GCC integration and PLDI 2009

Larry Evans

2009-06-23 19:53 TEMPLATE_PARM_PARAMETER_PACK redundant check in find_parameter_packs_r
2009-06-30 15:01 howto configure so that CFLAGS='-g3 -O0' in gcc/Makefile?

Laurent GUERBY

2009-06-25 21:50 Re: Phase 1 of gcc-in-cxx now complete (Ada)
2009-06-26 11:18 Re: Phase 1 of gcc-in-cxx now complete (Ada)
2009-06-26 15:59 Re: Phase 1 of gcc-in-cxx now complete (Ada)
2009-06-26 18:21 Re: Phase 1 of gcc-in-cxx now complete (Ada)
2009-06-27 10:55 Re: Phase 1 of gcc-in-cxx now complete (Ada)
2009-06-27 11:54 Re: Phase 1 of gcc-in-cxx now complete (Ada)
2009-06-27 12:53 Re: Phase 1 of gcc-in-cxx now complete (Ada)

Lijuan Hai

2009-06-17 02:52 gcc for i386-solaris doesn't expand builtin functions for atomic memory access

Ludovic Courtès

2009-06-05 11:01 [ANN] ForestGOMP 0.1, a libgomp-compatible OpenMP run-time

Maik Beckmann

2009-06-08 12:01 Re: The C++0x lambda branch

Marc Steinbach

2009-06-11 07:27 Complex numbers in c++0x

Mark Mitchell

2009-06-30 16:56 Re: Should -Wjump-misses-init be in -Wall?

Martin Guy

2009-06-09 08:57 Re: Machine Description Template?

Martin Jambor

2009-06-16 14:34 Re: Questionable function renaming

Matt

2009-06-25 21:39 Re: ICE building svn trunk on Ubuntu 9.x amd64
2009-06-26 23:53 Re: Phase 1 of gcc-in-cxx now complete

Maxim Kuvyrkov

2009-06-08 07:55 Re: sched2, ret, use, and VLIW bundling

Michael Hope

2009-06-03 09:39 Using a umulhisi3
2009-06-05 22:46 Re: Machine Description Template?
2009-06-28 09:41 Good progress

Michael Kruse

2009-06-28 10:30 Register Pressure in Instruction Level Parallelism
2009-06-28 22:53 Re: Register Pressure in Instruction Level Parallelism
2009-06-28 23:56 Re: Register Pressure in Instruction Level Parallelism
2009-06-29 19:02 Re: Register Pressure in Instruction Level Parallelism
2009-06-29 20:03 Re: Register Pressure in Instruction Level Parallelism

Michael Matz

2009-06-18 12:31 Re: VTA merge?

Michael Meissner

2009-06-02 20:49 Re: RFC: Option handling and PR 37565
2009-06-12 21:36 Re: Machine Description Template?
2009-06-15 02:38 Re: Regressions with dwarf debugging
2009-06-18 23:39 Re: GCC and boehm-gc
2009-06-19 00:14 Re: Ping: New Toshiba Media Processor (mep-elf) port and maintainer

Mikael Pettersson

2009-06-17 09:27 4.3 weekly snapshots bot broken?

Miles Bader

2009-06-04 06:59 Re: LLVM as a gcc plugin?
2009-06-23 03:44 Re: Should -Wjump-misses-init be in -Wall?

Mr Joe Brown

2009-06-03 00:39 Information
2009-06-08 10:49 Information
2009-06-08 10:49 Information

Nick Clifton

2009-06-02 09:38 Re: gcc --help for options which are not warnings or optimizations
2009-06-03 07:40 Re: gcc --help for options which are not warnings or optimizations

Nicolas COLLIN

2009-06-08 06:34 Intermediate representation
2009-06-08 12:11 Intermediate representation

NightStrike

2009-06-15 07:17 Re: diagnostics-branch merged into mainline
2009-06-15 16:02 Re: diagnostics-branch merged into mainline
2009-06-15 18:18 Re: diagnostics-branch merged into mainline
2009-06-16 15:42 Re: diagnostics-branch merged into mainline
2009-06-18 16:11 GCC and boehm-gc
2009-06-18 16:46 Re: GCC and boehm-gc
2009-06-18 17:09 Re: GCC and boehm-gc
2009-06-18 18:20 Re: GCC and boehm-gc
2009-06-18 21:41 Re: GCC and boehm-gc
2009-06-29 10:40 Re: Phase 1 of gcc-in-cxx now complete

Oliver Kellogg

2009-06-14 03:43 mainline breakage (r148442)
2009-06-15 20:38 Re: [gnat] reuse of ASTs already constructed
2009-06-17 04:20 Re: [gnat] reuse of ASTs already constructed
2009-06-28 22:15 Re: [gnat] reuse of ASTs already constructed

Olivier Bidou CNDI

2009-06-17 18:26 Faites vous élire Magistrat Juge au Tribunal de C ommerce

Olivier Hainque

2009-06-29 13:59 BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT vs g++ compat test expectation on aix ?

Onay Urfalioglu

2009-06-08 13:17 c++0x concepts support

Paolo Bonzini

2009-06-01 16:10 Re: Measuring FSF gcc from 4.1.2 to today on various benchmarks.
2009-06-09 18:10 Re: increasing the number of GCC reviewers
2009-06-10 07:50 Re: gcc 4.4.0 error at postreload.c:396
2009-06-10 14:38 Re: increasing the number of GCC reviewers
2009-06-10 15:28 Re: skip_evaluation
2009-06-10 15:51 Re: skip_evaluation
2009-06-12 07:56 Re: Code optimization only in loops
2009-06-12 16:32 Re: naked functions on x86 architecture
2009-06-18 10:00 Re: VTA merge?
2009-06-19 11:56 Re: How to deal with unrecognizable RTL code
2009-06-22 13:38 Re: (known?) Issue with bitmap iterators
2009-06-23 16:48 Re: Should -Wjump-misses-init be in -Wall?
2009-06-24 09:36 Re: How to deal with unrecognizable RTL code
2009-06-27 15:19 Re: Phase 1 of gcc-in-cxx now complete (Ada)
2009-06-29 06:28 Re: Compiling gcc 4.4.0 for Cell
2009-06-30 18:37 Re: gcc_update broken because of r149070

Paolo Carlini

2009-06-11 09:01 Re: Complex numbers in c++0x

Paul Brook

2009-06-10 13:00 Re: opaque vector types?

Paul Edwards

2009-06-05 12:45 i370 port
2009-06-05 14:57 Re: i370 port
2009-06-05 15:24 Re: i370 port
2009-06-05 15:39 Re: i370 port
2009-06-05 15:52 Re: i370 port
2009-06-05 15:57 Re: i370 port
2009-06-05 20:45 Re: i370 port
2009-06-06 15:00 Re: i370 port
2009-06-19 00:06 Re: i370 port

Peter Bergner

2009-06-21 03:27 Re: (known?) Issue with bitmap iterators

Peter O'Gorman

2009-06-01 13:18 Re: Bootstrap broken on darwin / fink

Petros Panayi

2009-06-10 10:45 Adding a new Struct (RECORD_TYPE)

petrov dot gazprom at gmail dot com

2009-06-18 10:10 Is there any pointers you might have

Phil Pratt-Szeliga

2009-06-23 16:18 Re: OpenCL inquire
2009-06-28 19:06 Compiling gcc 4.4.0 for Cell

Piotr Wyderski

2009-06-03 10:56 Auto-import problem

Rafael Espindola

2009-06-04 10:14 Re: LLVM as a gcc plugin?
2009-06-04 10:33 Re: LLVM as a gcc plugin?
2009-06-08 01:10 Re: LLVM as a gcc plugin?
2009-06-08 13:28 Re: LLVM as a gcc plugin?
2009-06-15 13:32 Re: plugin callbacks after compiler errors
2009-06-15 14:28 Re: git mirror at gcc.gnu.org
2009-06-16 10:49 Re: diagnostics-branch merged into mainline
2009-06-16 11:01 Re: diagnostics-branch merged into mainline
2009-06-16 11:48 Re: instructions for compiling plugins?
2009-06-16 12:15 Re: diagnostics-branch merged into mainline

Rainer Emrich

2009-06-18 09:33 gcc trunk miscompiles binutils
2009-06-30 15:41 Failure building trunk on cygwin

Ralf Wildenhues

2009-06-07 05:22 git mirror at infradead?
2009-06-07 10:40 Re: git mirror at infradead?
2009-06-20 06:56 Re: Should -Wjump-misses-init be in -Wall?
2009-06-28 07:25 Updating Autoconf and Automake versions used in GCC and src
2009-06-29 18:04 Re: Updating Autoconf and Automake versions used in GCC and src

Ramana Radhakrishnan

2009-06-05 22:31 Re: Machine Description Template?

Revital1 Eres

2009-06-08 18:11 error in gfc_simplify_expr
2009-06-09 15:33 Re: Bootstrap failures on solaris
2009-06-23 13:41 Re: Unnecessary regmoves in modulo scheduler?
2009-06-23 13:56 RE: Unnecessary regmoves in modulo scheduler?
2009-06-29 06:13 Re: Compiling gcc 4.4.0 for Cell

Richard Guenther

2009-06-03 10:53 Re: Restrict keyword doesn't work correctly in GCC 4.4
2009-06-03 14:09 Re: Restrict keyword doesn't work correctly in GCC 4.4
2009-06-03 15:46 Re: Restrict keyword doesn't work correctly in GCC 4.4
2009-06-04 11:45 GCC 4.5.0 Status Report (2009-06-04)
2009-06-04 20:53 Re: GCC Summit 2010 topic (potentially).
2009-06-04 21:00 Re: STRIP_NOPS and lower-precision/bit-field types
2009-06-05 10:19 Re: VTA merge?
2009-06-05 11:18 Re: VTA merge?
2009-06-09 15:33 Re: What is -3.I (as opposed to 0-3.I) supposed evaluate to?
2009-06-09 18:21 Re: increasing the number of GCC reviewers
2009-06-13 15:23 Re: VTA guality assessment: better than -O0 ;-)
2009-06-13 18:18 Re: VTA guality assessment: better than -O0 ;-)
2009-06-15 11:19 Re: Pointer analysis in GCC-4.3.0 - Getting spurious pointsTo pair.
2009-06-16 11:16 Re: "plugin"-ifying the MELT branch.
2009-06-16 12:43 Re: Help with BLOCK vs BIND_EXPR trees
2009-06-16 12:49 Re: Questions about VAR_DECL and DECL_EXPR
2009-06-16 12:53 Re: "plugin"-ifying the MELT branch.
2009-06-16 12:56 Re: Questionable function renaming
2009-06-16 13:02 Re: Questionable function renaming
2009-06-16 14:24 Re: Help with BLOCK vs BIND_EXPR trees
2009-06-16 14:26 Re: Questionable function renaming
2009-06-17 10:49 Re: "plugin"-ifying the MELT branch.
2009-06-20 15:01 Re: (known?) Issue with bitmap iterators
2009-06-21 11:02 Re: VTA merge?
2009-06-21 11:38 Re: VTA merge?
2009-06-21 11:50 Re: VTA merge?
2009-06-22 11:35 Re: plugins directory?
2009-06-22 11:37 Re: (known?) Issue with bitmap iterators
2009-06-23 14:55 Re: [OTish] Proving compiler algorithms implement same semantics as language specs? [was Re: [PATCH][RFC] Re-implement restrict support]
2009-06-25 19:18 Re: Should -Wjump-misses-init be in -Wall?
2009-06-25 20:36 Re: Phase 1 of gcc-in-cxx now complete
2009-06-25 22:17 Re: Phase 1 of gcc-in-cxx now complete (Ada)
2009-06-27 09:48 Re: Phase 1 of gcc-in-cxx now complete
2009-06-29 13:13 Re: GCC feature req: warn when bitops exceed type size (was: conntrack untracked match is broken)

Richard Henderson

2009-06-24 15:35 Re: Question about dead_or_predicable

Richard Kenner

2009-06-10 12:15 Re: increasing the number of GCC reviewers

Richard Sandiford

2009-06-29 14:06 PR 23296: Strange -O3 -finstrument-functions behaviour
2009-06-30 18:31 Updating fixed-point support for new C constant expression handling

Rob Myers via RT

2009-06-23 21:36 [gnu.org #456639] broken link in libstdc++ manual online

Robert Dewar

2009-06-20 14:26 Re: Should -Wjump-misses-init be in -Wall?
2009-06-20 15:06 Re: Should -Wjump-misses-init be in -Wall?
2009-06-20 15:40 Re: Should -Wjump-misses-init be in -Wall?
2009-06-23 01:46 Re: Should -Wjump-misses-init be in -Wall?
2009-06-26 17:36 Re: Phase 1 of gcc-in-cxx now complete (Ada)
2009-06-26 18:07 Re: Phase 1 of gcc-in-cxx now complete (Ada)
2009-06-27 13:41 Re: Phase 1 of gcc-in-cxx now complete

Rodolfo Lima

2009-06-15 23:25 C++0x unrestricted unions
2009-06-15 23:30 Re: C++0x unrestricted unions

samboy

2009-06-26 07:09 unsigned integer wrap 'trap'.

Sebastian Pop

2009-06-27 18:07 Re: Phase 1 of gcc-in-cxx now complete

Seema Ravandale

2009-06-15 10:33 Pointer analysis in GCC-4.3.0 - Getting spurious pointsTo pair.

Seiji Kachi

2009-06-26 13:09 Re: Failure building current 4.5 snapshot on Cygwin
2009-06-27 00:26 Re: Failure building current 4.5 snapshot on Cygwin

soufiane BAGHDADI

2009-06-20 21:01 an opencl to ati stream converter

Stelian Pop

2009-06-03 17:49 Problem with init of structure bit fields
2009-06-03 19:32 Re: Problem with init of structure bit fields
2009-06-03 21:36 Re: Problem with init of structure bit fields

Steve Kargl

2009-06-01 18:14 Re: Fortran-related libgomp failures in case of -fno-openmp
2009-06-01 20:21 Re: Fortran-related libgomp failures in case of -fno-openmp
2009-06-14 03:14 Regressions with dwarf debugging
2009-06-26 16:28 Re: Failure building current 4.5 snapshot on Cygwin
2009-06-26 17:01 Re: Failure building current 4.5 snapshot on Cygwin

Steven Bosscher

2009-06-03 16:00 From regno to pseudo?
2009-06-04 10:21 Re: LLVM as a gcc plugin?
2009-06-05 10:43 Re: LLVM as a gcc plugin?
2009-06-08 10:41 Re: LLVM as a gcc plugin?
2009-06-10 07:45 Re: increasing the number of GCC reviewers
2009-06-23 22:27 Question about dead_or_predicable
2009-06-24 05:41 Re: Question about dead_or_predicable
2009-06-25 07:32 Re: Question about dead_or_predicable
2009-06-30 17:26 gcc_update broken because of r149070

Taras Glek

2009-06-09 19:33 plugin callbacks after compiler errors
2009-06-10 02:14 Re: plugin callbacks after compiler errors
2009-06-19 21:54 [plugins] language makefiles and installing cp/ headers

Till Straumann

2009-06-22 14:47 gcc 4.3.2 vectorizes access to volatile array
2009-06-22 18:15 Re: gcc 4.3.2 vectorizes access to volatile array
2009-06-22 20:03 Re: gcc 4.3.2 vectorizes access to volatile array

Tim MÃnchen

2009-06-02 06:34 Re: Link error ....redefinition of......

Tim Prince

2009-06-26 14:12 Re: Failure building current 4.5 snapshot on Cygwin
2009-06-26 15:36 Re: Failure building current 4.5 snapshot on Cygwin
2009-06-26 15:41 Re: Failure building current 4.5 snapshot on Cygwin
2009-06-26 17:06 Re: Failure building current 4.5 snapshot on Cygwin

Tobias Burnus

2009-06-01 07:01 Re: [fortran] Different FUNC_DECLS with the same DECL_NAME - MAIN__ and named PROGRAM main functions [was Re: gcc-4.5-20090528 is now available]
2009-06-08 17:39 Re: [fortran] Different FUNC_DECLS with the same DECL_NAME - MAIN__ and named PROGRAM main functions [was Re: gcc-4.5-20090528 is now available]
2009-06-08 20:07 Re: error in gfc_simplify_expr

Tobias Grosser

2009-06-10 18:14 Re: Polyhedral Model

Tom Christensen

2009-06-10 05:45 Re: Please update http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.3/buildstat.html
2009-06-10 20:30 Re: Please update http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.3/buildstat.html

Tom Tromey

2009-06-05 16:14 Re: "plugin"-ifying the MELT branch.
2009-06-09 21:36 Re: increasing the number of GCC reviewers
2009-06-10 01:36 Re: increasing the number of GCC reviewers
2009-06-19 16:16 Re: gcj build issues.
2009-06-29 17:05 Re: Updating Autoconf and Automake versions used in GCC and src
2009-06-29 18:23 Re: Updating Autoconf and Automake versions used in GCC and src

Tomasz Francuz

2009-06-16 09:51 AVR C++ - how to move vtables into FLASH memory
2009-06-17 08:00 Re: AVR C++ - how to move vtables into FLASH memory

Toon Moene

2009-06-04 17:33 GCC Summit 2010 topic (potentially).

Ulrich Weigand

2009-06-05 15:21 Re: i370 port
2009-06-15 17:46 Re: i370 port
2009-06-19 12:28 Re: i370 port

Uros Bizjak

2009-06-04 06:30 LLVM as a gcc plugin?

Vijay

2009-06-03 10:33 Re: Enquiry

Vijay Holimath

2009-06-02 13:00 Enquiry
2009-06-02 13:52 Enquiry

Vladimir Makarov

2009-06-29 16:25 Re: Register Pressure in Instruction Level Parallelism
2009-06-29 16:26 Re: Register Pressure in Instruction Level Parallelism
2009-06-29 16:27 Re: Register Pressure in Instruction Level Parallelism
2009-06-29 19:35 Re: Register Pressure in Instruction Level Parallelism

Weddington, Eric

2009-06-10 14:35 RE: increasing the number of GCC reviewers
2009-06-10 15:47 RE: increasing the number of GCC reviewers

Zachary Turner

2009-06-12 16:20 naked functions on x86 architecture
2009-06-12 17:25 Re: naked functions on x86 architecture
2009-06-12 17:56 Re: naked functions on x86 architecture

Zbigniew Chamski

2009-06-05 09:52 New Interactive Compilation Interface (ICI) v2.0 has been released

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]

Search: Limit to:

Indexes:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav:	[Browse other archives for this mailing list] [Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.3

gcc archiveauthor index for June, 2009

gcc archive
author index for June, 2009