gcc 4.4.0 on Solaris 10 Sparc, some tests failed.

[Amitava Dutta <ad_101 at yahoo dot com>]

Ran the "make -k check" without the -j option,
after creating a symlink to /usr/local/bin/stty
(noticed many errors about that)

Is this as good a build as I can expect?

Here are the results 
(output from config.guess and "gcc -v" are below) :

                === gcc Summary ===
# of expected passes            50284
# of unexpected failures        19
# of expected failures          234
# of unsupported tests          656

                === g++ Summary ===
# of expected passes            19007
# of unexpected failures        1
# of unexpected successes       1
# of expected failures          144
# of unsupported tests          185

                === gfortran Summary ===
# of expected passes            29193
# of expected failures          12
# of unsupported tests          135

                === libstdc++ Summary ===
# of expected passes            5733
# of unexpected failures        1
# of unexpected successes       2
# of expected failures          80
# of unsupported tests          393

                === libgomp Summary ===
# of expected passes            2228
# of unexpected failures        80
# of unsupported tests          9

/////////   gcc -v for the new compiler /////////////////
$ /usr/local/gcc-4.4.0/bin/gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: sparc-sun-solaris2.10
Configured with: /big3/src/gcc/src/gcc-4.4.0/configure --srcdir=/big3/src/gcc/src/gcc-4.4.0 --prefix=/usr/local/gcc-4.4.0 --without-gnu-as --with-as=/usr/ccs/bin/as --without-gnu-ld --with-ld=/usr/ccs/bin/ld --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.4.0 (GCC) 

//////   config.guess from the source directory  ////////////
$ /usr/local/src/gcc/src/gcc-4.4.0/config.guess
sparc-sun-solaris2.10


Best regards
Amitava


--- On Fri, 5/15/09, Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@adacore.com> wrote:

> From: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@adacore.com>
> Subject: Re: Build of gcc 4.4.0 on Solaris 10 Sparc ok, most tests failed.
> To: "Kaveh R. GHAZI" <ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu>
> Cc: ad_101@yahoo.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org
> Date: Friday, May 15, 2009, 5:20 PM
> > To clarify, is it "make -l #"
> that fails or "make -j #" on Solaris?
> 
> "make -j"
> 
> > Parallel testing with -j# used to work fine, but
> admitedly its been a long
> > while since I lost my solaris box...? (I don't
> know if the load avg based
> > mechanism for -l ever worked.)? Is there a PR
> number?
> 
> That's already fixed.
> 
> -- 
> Eric Botcazou
>