This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [gnat] reuse of ASTs already constructed

From: Robert Dewar <dewar at adacore dot com>
To: okellogg at users dot sourceforge dot net
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sun, 03 May 2009 21:14:02 -0400
Subject: Re: [gnat] reuse of ASTs already constructed
References: <1239557374.7565.37.camel@tidbit.site> <1240083309.4554.45.camel@tidbit.site> <1240175954.4554.50.camel@tidbit.site> <1241385654.4763.38.camel@tidbit.site> <49FE09D9.4090702@adacore.com> <1241386066.4763.42.camel@tidbit.site>

Oliver Kellogg wrote:

Sorry if I'm slow in understanding:
Are you saying that introducing an extra field would
cause problems (memory or other) ?
Do you think it would be okay to use the Str3 field, then?


I don't see that Str3 is free in any of these nodes, what
nodes are you talking about (remember that Str3 overlaps
Node3, List3 etc).

Thanks.

Robert Dewar wrote:
Oliver Kellogg wrote:
On 2009-04-19, at 23:19 +0200, Oliver Kellogg wrote:
[...]
How about not doing the name expansion in-place but rather
storing the expanded name in an extra node field?

You could have a separate vector for expanded names I suppose ...

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [gnat] reuse of ASTs already constructed
  - From: Oliver Kellogg

References:
- Re: [gnat] reuse of ASTs already constructed
  - From: Oliver Kellogg
- Re: [gnat] reuse of ASTs already constructed
  - From: Robert Dewar
- Re: [gnat] reuse of ASTs already constructed
  - From: Oliver Kellogg

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]