This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: x86_64-apple-darwin libjava build broken on gcc 4.4 branch

From: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu dot org>
To: Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo dot med dot uc dot edu>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2009 15:05:33 +0200
Subject: Re: x86_64-apple-darwin libjava build broken on gcc 4.4 branch
References: <20090409015943.GA3443@bromo.med.uc.edu> <49DDC168.5030808@gnu.org> <20090409130131.GA9622@bromo.med.uc.edu>

>    Mike Stump's recommendation on this issue is to use the match
> darwin[912]* to make sure that this is captured for darwin9 through
> darwin29. The idea is to not match darwin3 through darwin8. This usage
> is present in several places...
> 
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-11/msg00333.html
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-11/msg01532.html
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-12/msg00177.html

Ok, then using darwin[[912]]* is also fine.  I misremembered darwin9 as
Tiger which was the first publicly distributed version supporting Intel
CPUs, wasn't it?

Paolo

Follow-Ups:
- Re: x86_64-apple-darwin libjava build broken on gcc 4.4 branch
  - From: Jack Howarth

References:
- x86_64-apple-darwin libjava build broken on gcc 4.4 branch
  - From: Jack Howarth
- Re: x86_64-apple-darwin libjava build broken on gcc 4.4 branch
  - From: Paolo Bonzini
- Re: x86_64-apple-darwin libjava build broken on gcc 4.4 branch
  - From: Jack Howarth

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]