This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [cond-optab] svn branch created, looking for reviews for the "cleanup" parts
- From: Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
- To: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu dot org>
- Cc: GCC Development <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>, Andreas Krebbel <Andreas dot Krebbel at de dot ibm dot com>, Uros Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com>
- Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 11:59:32 +0200
- Subject: Re: [cond-optab] svn branch created, looking for reviews for the "cleanup" parts
- References: <49DB22F5.7050806@gnu.org>
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 11:55 AM, Paolo Bonzini <bonzini@gnu.org> wrote:
> I created the cond-optab svn branch and finished committing the
> cond-optab patches to it. ?I also documented it in svn.html.
>
> The branch was bootstrapped i686-pc-linux-gnu and is identical to the
> tree that Kaz bootstrapped on sh4-linux.
>
> The rest of this message details the plans for merging and further
> testing of the branch.
>
> (Sorry for the continuous spamming of updates---but I really need
> reviewers now...)
>
> 1. PATCHES READY TO BE MERGED
> =============================
>
> The following patches can be transported to mainline independent of the
> completion of the project. ?I would like to merge these patches one at a
> time, so reviews for these are welcome now.
>
> r145595: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-03/msg00546.html (expand)
This is ok.
> r145596: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-03/msg00548.html (i386,
> s390, expand)
This is ok given no objection from the two affected targets maintainers
within 48h.
> r145600: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-04/msg00497.html (expand)
This is ok.
> r145611: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-03/msg00547.html (expand)
This is ok.
Supposed they bootstrap/test ok on trunk of course.
Thanks,
Richard.