This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: C++ FE stripping const qualifiers from function prototypes (bug or feature?)

From: Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>
To: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: Paolo Carlini <paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com>, Diego Novillo <dnovillo at google dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, Lawrence Crowl <crowl at google dot com>, Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 12:48:28 -0400
Subject: Re: C++ FE stripping const qualifiers from function prototypes (bug or feature?)
References: <b798aad50903120342r7ba8809fj93f35f275a8d5c84@mail.gmail.com> <49B90F06.4020002@oracle.com> <4aca3dc20903120805o2679eee2t7d7d0403a8f62d5d@mail.gmail.com> <49B9271C.90200@codesourcery.com>

On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 11:15 AM, Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> Daniel Berlin wrote:
>
>> But if it was following this and removing const qualifiers, shouldn't
>> it have remove the const from const char * too?
>> Or am i missing something?
>
> No, that is not a top-level qualifier.
>
Ah, it only removes top level qualifiers, that was the part i was missing :)

References:
- C++ FE stripping const qualifiers from function prototypes (bug or feature?)
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: C++ FE stripping const qualifiers from function prototypes (bug or feature?)
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: C++ FE stripping const qualifiers from function prototypes (bug or feature?)
  - From: Daniel Berlin
- Re: C++ FE stripping const qualifiers from function prototypes (bug or feature?)
  - From: Mark Mitchell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]