This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Revision 144098 (d.d. Wed Feb 11 08:56:41 2009 UTC (4 weeks ago)) is not a regression bug fix.


On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 3:56 PM, Steven Bosscher <stevenb.gcc@gmail.com> wrote:
> - Show quoted text -
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 3:34 PM, Paolo Bonzini <bonzini@gnu.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Will "REGNO (operands[0]) == REGNO (operands[1])" work here?
>>
>> Yes. ?I wanted to be conservative in case one day subregs or who knows
>> what are allowed. ?I'll defer to maintainers or other people (Steven?),
>> either way is fine by me.
>
> If REGNO works now, I'd use it. ?If "one day" subregs are allowed,
> REGNO will trigger an rtl-checking failure anyway.

Indeed.  The patch with REGNO is pre-approved if it bootstraps/regtests.

Thanks,
Richard.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]