This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: variadic templates supported in non-c++0x mode

From: Paolo Carlini <paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com>
To: Manuel López-Ibáñez <lopezibanez at gmail dot com>
Cc: Jan van Dijk <jan at epgmod dot phys dot tue dot nl>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 12:49:52 +0100
Subject: Re: variadic templates supported in non-c++0x mode
References: <200903101156.16887.jan@epgmod.phys.tue.nl> <49B64C98.3070608@oracle.com> <6c33472e0903100442g5d173758wb20d6ff2186ef522@mail.gmail.com>

Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
> In any case the wording of the warning is weird: it says variadic
> templates are not available but then it is accepted with just a
> warning.
>   
I agree.
>> to variadic templates. It also happens, for example, for:
>>
>> enum class e { };
>>
>>     
>
> What is the warning here?
>   
Same story Manuel. All those situations are dealt with via the same
maybe_warn_cpp0x.

Paolo.

References:
- variadic templates supported in non-c++0x mode
  - From: Jan van Dijk
- Re: variadic templates supported in non-c++0x mode
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: variadic templates supported in non-c++0x mode
  - From: Manuel López-Ibáñez

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]