This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
gcj -v --help: ecj switches
- From: Ralf Wildenhues <Ralf dot Wildenhues at gmx dot de>
- To: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 08:20:35 +0100
- Subject: gcj -v --help: ecj switches
Hello,
I have a patch (accompanying those other ones on gcc-paches) to fix
--- a/gcc/java/lang.opt
+++ b/gcc/java/lang.opt
@@ -209,212 +209,213 @@ Java
;
; Warnings handled by ecj.
-; FIXME: document them
;
but I did start off with the help texts from
<http://help.eclipse.org/stable/index.jsp?topic=/org.eclipse.jdt.doc.isv/guide/jdt_api_compile.htm>
which AFAICS falls under the Eclipse Public License - v 1.0
<http://www.eclipse.org/legal/epl-v10.html>.
Now my question, before I blindly post this to {gcc,java}-patches and
thus create potential legal hassles for whoever works on it: was it
OKed (by the SC or FSF) to integrate such material into GCC?
If not, would you think that it suffices if I reformulate the entries
sufficiently, or do we need to start playing the legal game, if the
situation is to be improved?
Thanks!
Ralf