gcc archive
date index for March, 2009

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

March 31, 2009
23:40 Re: help for arm avr bfin cris frv h8300 m68k mcore mmix pdp11 rs6000 sh vax Alexandre Oliva
22:57 gcc-4.4-20090331 is now available gccadmin
19:20 Re: GCC 4.4 Branch Created Gabriel Dos Reis
19:05 Re: GCC 4.4 Branch Created Daniel Berlin
19:01 Re: GCC 4.4 Branch Created Gabriel Dos Reis
18:58 Re: GCC 4.4 Branch Created Daniel Berlin
18:56 Successfull build of gcc-4.4.0 [gcc-4_4-branch revision 145224] for target i686-pc-mingw32 (cross build from i686-pc-cygwin) Rainer Emrich
18:51 Re: GCC 4.4 Branch Created Rainer Orth
18:48 Re: GCC 4.4 Branch Created Daniel Berlin
18:46 Re: GCC 4.4 Branch Created Rainer Orth
16:39 [cond-optab] update and first call for review Paolo Bonzini
15:30 RE: GCC at Google Summer of Code'2009 Grigori Fursin
14:50 RE: gcc99 inlining rules Bingfeng Mei
14:50 Re: gcc.gnu.org ftp down? Ian Lance Taylor
14:47 new cloog-ppl-0.15.tar.gz broken on darwin Jack Howarth
14:32 Re: gcc99 inlining rules Joseph S. Myers
14:31 Re: gcc99 inlining rules Richard Guenther
14:24 gcc99 inlining rules Bingfeng Mei
13:38 gcc.gnu.org ftp down? Jack Howarth
11:51 Re: {gSoc}application : Automatic parallelization in Graphite Razya Ladelsky
09:02 Successfull build of gcc-4.4.0 [gcc-4_4-branch revision 145224] for target x86_64-pc-mingw32 (cross build from i686-pc-cygwin) Rainer Emrich
06:55 Re: Testing patch to make FDO profile data tolerate more source changes Paolo Bonzini
06:13 Re: logical error with 16bit arithmatic operations daniel tian
04:55 Re: logical error with 16bit arithmatic operations Ian Lance Taylor
03:53 Re: logical error with 16bit arithmatic operations daniel tian
03:26 Re: Testing patch to make FDO profile data tolerate more source changes Neil Vachharajani
03:05 Re: New no-undefined-overflow branch Eus
00:42 Re: Debuglocus Alexandre Oliva

March 30, 2009
23:41 Re: Testing patch to make FDO profile data tolerate more source changes Andrew Pinski
22:30 Re: Ideas for Google Summer of Code Joseph S. Myers
21:50 Re: Testing patch to make FDO profile data tolerate more source changes Janis Johnson
21:13 Re: Ideas for Google Summer of Code Joe Buck
20:55 Re: Ideas for Google Summer of Code phil++
20:53 Testing patch to make FDO profile data tolerate more source changes Neil Vachharajani
20:36 Re: Ideas for Google Summer of Code Ross Ridge
20:28 Re: Getting variable attribute from rtx Ian Lance Taylor
19:33 Re: Ideas for Google Summer of Code Ross Ridge
19:28 Re: Getting variable attribute from rtx Dobes
19:11 Re: Getting variable attribute from rtx Ian Lance Taylor
18:43 Re: Use of __restrict__ in g++ Paul Koning
18:35 Use of __restrict__ in g++ quick
18:04 Re: Ideas for Google Summer of Code Philip Pratt-Szeliga
17:46 Re: Ideas for Google Summer of Code Paolo Bonzini
17:33 Re: Ideas for Google Summer of Code Joe Buck
17:10 Re: Ideas for Google Summer of Code phil++
16:39 Re: Ideas for Google Summer of Code Joe Buck
16:30 Re: Linking libgfortran with libiberty Paolo Bonzini
15:15 Re: Linking libgfortran with libiberty Paolo Bonzini
13:19 Re: Linking libgfortran with libiberty FX
11:53 Re: Linking libgfortran with libiberty Paolo Bonzini
11:47 Re: Ideas for Google Summer of Code Paolo Bonzini
11:40 Re: Ideas for Google Summer of Code Joseph S. Myers
09:22 Re: Minimum GMP/MPFR version bumps for GCC-4.5 Andreas Schwab
08:10 Re: Ideas for Google Summer of Code Paolo Bonzini
03:29 Re: Minimum GMP/MPFR version bumps for GCC-4.5 Ralf Corsepius

March 29, 2009
22:55 Re: status of the plugins branch vs 4.4? Diego Novillo
22:54 Re: GCC 4.4 Branch Created Joe Buck
22:52 status of the plugins branch vs 4.4? Basile STARYNKEVITCH
22:47 gcc-4.3-20090329 is now available gccadmin
22:23 Re: Linking libgfortran with libiberty Jakub Jelinek
20:30 Re: Ideas for Google Summer of Code Daniel Kraft
19:34 Re: Minimum GMP/MPFR version bumps for GCC-4.5 Gerald Pfeifer
19:11 Re: [PPL-devel] PPL broken for Canadian-cross builds Sebastian Pop
17:55 Re: Linking libgfortran with libiberty IainS
17:28 Ideas for Google Summer of Code phil++
16:32 Re: [PPL-devel] PPL broken for Canadian-cross builds Joseph S. Myers
16:27 Re: GCC 4.4 Branch Created Joseph S. Myers
15:47 Re: Minimum GMP/MPFR version bumps for GCC-4.5 Laurent GUERBY
15:47 Re: GCC 4.4 Branch Created Daniel Berlin
15:28 Re: GCC 4.4 Branch Created Joseph S. Myers
15:27 Re: GCC 4.4 Branch Created Joseph S. Myers
15:21 Re: Minimum GMP/MPFR version bumps for GCC-4.5 Joseph S. Myers
15:17 Re: Minimum GMP/MPFR version bumps for GCC-4.5 Laurent GUERBY
14:52 Re: Linking libgfortran with libiberty FX
14:46 Re: Deprecating Itanium1 for GCC 4.4 Joseph S. Myers
14:37 Re: Minimum GMP/MPFR version bumps for GCC-4.5 Joseph S. Myers
14:36 Re: Linking libgfortran with libiberty Joseph S. Myers
13:29 Re: Deprecating Itanium1 for GCC 4.4 Steven Bosscher
11:45 Re: [PPL-devel] PPL broken for Canadian-cross builds Roberto Bagnara
11:32 Re: Minimum GMP/MPFR version bumps for GCC-4.5 Laurent GUERBY
11:08 Re: Linking libgfortran with libiberty Richard Guenther
11:01 Linking libgfortran with libiberty FX
10:33 Re: Merging the alias-improvements branch Ira Rosen
10:06 Re: Merging the alias-improvements branch Richard Guenther
07:50 Re: Merging the alias-improvements branch Ira Rosen
00:49 Re: Minimum GMP/MPFR version bumps for GCC-4.5 Joseph S. Myers

March 28, 2009
23:49 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Gerald Pfeifer
23:44 Re: Minimum GMP/MPFR version bumps for GCC-4.5 Kaveh Ghazi
17:10 RE: GCC at Google Summer of Code'2009 Grigori Fursin
16:49 Re: Getting variable attribute from rtx Dobes
16:48 Re: GCC 4.4 Branch Created Mark Mitchell
14:52 Re: Merging the alias-improvements branch Toon Moene
12:49 Re: Minimum GMP/MPFR version bumps for GCC-4.5 David Edelsohn
12:41 Re: Minimum GMP/MPFR version bumps for GCC-4.5 Laurent GUERBY
12:16 Re: GCC 4.4 Branch Created Jakub Jelinek
10:20 Re: GCC 4.4 Branch Created Richard Guenther
10:03 Re: Merging the alias-improvements branch Eric Botcazou
09:45 Re: Merging the alias-improvements branch Richard Guenther
08:12 Re: Merging the alias-improvements branch Eric Botcazou
07:58 Re: GCC 4.4 Branch Created Eric Botcazou
07:34 Re: GCC 4.4 Branch Created Joseph S. Myers

March 27, 2009
23:47 Re: Merging the alias-improvements branch Diego Novillo
23:38 Merging the alias-improvements branch Richard Guenther
23:20 gcc-4.5-20090327 is now available gccadmin
23:10 Re: GCC 4.4 Branch Created Mark Mitchell
23:04 Re: GCC 4.4 Branch Created Daniel Berlin
22:52 gcc-4.4-20090327 is now available gccadmin
22:35 Re: GCC 4.4 Branch Created Joseph S. Myers
21:27 GCC 4.4 Branch Created Mark Mitchell
20:17 Re: Minimum GMP/MPFR version bumps for GCC-4.5 Toon Moene
19:58 Re: Minimum GMP/MPFR version bumps for GCC-4.5 Steven Bosscher
19:40 Re: Minimum GMP/MPFR version bumps for GCC-4.5 Toon Moene
19:34 Re: cmath call builtin sqrtf but many platforms seem miss that(was Re: lrint lrintf problems ) Gunther Nikl
19:06 Re: Getting variable attribute from rtx Ian Lance Taylor
18:39 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Toon Moene
18:39 Re: Getting variable attribute from rtx Eric Botcazou
18:28 Re: Minimum GMP/MPFR version bumps for GCC-4.5 Kaveh Ghazi
18:25 Re: GCC EH unwinding bug and libjava calling std::terminate () Jan Hubicka
18:21 Re: GCC EH unwinding bug and libjava calling std::terminate () Andrew Haley
18:14 Re: GCC EH unwinding bug and libjava calling std::terminate () Jan Hubicka
18:07 Getting variable attribute from rtx Dobes
14:28 Re: logical error with 16bit arithmatic operations Ian Lance Taylor
13:11 Re: GCC EH unwinding bug and libjava calling std::terminate () Andrew Haley
12:49 Re: New no-undefined-overflow branch Paolo Bonzini
12:38 GCC EH unwinding bug and libjava calling std::terminate () Jan Hubicka
12:24 Re: New no-undefined-overflow branch Eus
09:12 logical error with 16bit arithmatic operations daniel tian
03:10 Re: Minimum GMP/MPFR version bumps for GCC-4.5 Ralf Corsepius
00:41 Re: Minimum GMP/MPFR version bumps for GCC-4.5 Joe Buck
00:11 Re: Minimum GMP/MPFR version bumps for GCC-4.5 Joel Sherrill
00:01 Re: Minimum GMP/MPFR version bumps for GCC-4.5 Tim Prince

March 26, 2009
22:52 gcc-4.3-20090326 is now available gccadmin
22:20 Re: Minimum GMP/MPFR version bumps for GCC-4.5 Kaveh R. Ghazi
21:54 Re: Minimum GMP/MPFR version bumps for GCC-4.5 Steven Bosscher
21:39 Minimum GMP/MPFR version bumps for GCC-4.5 Kaveh R. Ghazi
17:43 Re: Successfull build of gcc-4.4.0 [trunk revision 145008] on i686-pc-cygwin Dave Korn
14:27 Re: {gSoc}application : Automatic parallelization in Graphite andrew babanin
09:21 Re: {gSoc}application : Automatic parallelization in Graphite Li Feng
07:36 [cond-optab] update after first round of testing (results for all targets) Paolo Bonzini
07:17 Re: {gSoc}application : Automatic parallelization in Graphite Tobias Grosser
02:36 {gSoc}application : Automatic parallelization in Graphite Li Feng

March 25, 2009
22:44 gcc-4.2-20090325 is now available gccadmin
21:08 Re: Google Summer of Code 2009 Tobias Grosser
17:57 Re: Successfull build of gcc-4.4.0 [trunk revision 145008] on i686-pc-cygwin Eric Botcazou
16:34 Re: Successfull build of gcc-4.4.0 [trunk revision 145008] on i686-pc-cygwin Dave Korn
16:26 Re: Successfull build of gcc-4.4.0 [trunk revision 145008] on i686-pc-cygwin Rainer Emrich
14:09 Re: Register Allocation Bug? Ian Lance Taylor
13:52 Re: Should structure with flexible array be allowed to be passed by value? H.J. Lu
13:48 Re: Register Allocation Bug? Kasper Bonne
13:38 Re: Should structure with flexible array be allowed to be passed by value? Joseph S. Myers
13:31 Re: Should structure with flexible array be allowed to be passed by value? H.J. Lu
11:42 Re: Register Allocation Bug? Andrew Haley
11:32 Register Allocation Bug? Kasper Bonne
11:02 Re: Successfull build of gcc-4.4.0 [trunk revision 145008] on i686-pc-cygwin Rainer Emrich
10:40 Re: Successfull build of gcc-4.4.0 [trunk revision 145008] on i686-pc-cygwin Eric Botcazou
10:02 Successfull build of gcc-4.4.0 [trunk revision 145008] on i686-pc-cygwin Rainer Emrich
07:26 problems with -fdump-tree options (gcc 4.1.2) Tony Zhang
02:19 Re: Inline Assembly Error: suffix or operands invalid for 'shr' Chris Lattner

March 24, 2009
20:24 Re: Inline Assembly Error: suffix or operands invalid for 'shr' H.J. Lu
20:22 RE: Inline Assembly Error: suffix or operands invalid for 'shr' Paul Koning
20:18 RE: Inline Assembly Error: suffix or operands invalid for 'shr' Rodrigo Dominguez
18:09 Re: Inline Assembly Error: suffix or operands invalid for 'shr' H.J. Lu
18:03 Google Summer of Code 2009 Pranav
18:02 Inline Assembly Error: suffix or operands invalid for 'shr' Rodrigo Dominguez
17:37 Re: Should structure with flexible array be allowed to be passed by value? Dave Korn
17:21 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) David Edelsohn
17:14 Re: Should structure with flexible array be allowed to be passed by value? Joseph S. Myers
17:03 Re: Should structure with flexible array be allowed to be passed by value? Gabriel Dos Reis
17:01 Re: Should structure with flexible array be allowed to be passed by value? Brian Ellis
16:03 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Tim Prince
15:56 Re: Should structure with flexible array be allowed to be passed by value? H.J. Lu
15:51 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Andrew Haley
15:33 Re: Should structure with flexible array be allowed to be passed by value? Joseph S. Myers
15:20 Re: Should structure with flexible array be allowed to be passed by value? H.J. Lu
15:16 Re: Should structure with flexible array be allowed to be passed by value? Joseph S. Myers
15:01 Should structure with flexible array be allowed to be passed by value? H.J. Lu
14:58 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Chris Lattner
14:03 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Ian Lance Taylor
12:30 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Richard Kenner
10:49 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Andrew Haley
10:22 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Dominique Dhumieres
09:58 RE: Typo or intended? Bingfeng Mei
05:20 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Jeff Law
05:12 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Dave Korn
03:06 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Jeff Law
02:36 Re: GCC C FRONT END EXPLANATION Ian Lance Taylor
00:54 Re: GCC C FRONT END EXPLANATION Eduardo Cruz

March 23, 2009
21:58 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Joe Buck
21:05 Re: Posix C++ integration Lawrence Crowl
20:16 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Ian Lance Taylor
20:14 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Ian Lance Taylor
20:12 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Ian Lance Taylor
20:04 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Ian Lance Taylor
19:57 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Joe Buck
19:40 Re: Typo or intended? Vladimir Makarov
19:35 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Tom Tromey
19:32 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Tom Tromey
18:55 Variable length arrays : aligned on stack Jean Christophe Beyler
18:55 Re: Problem with a cross-compiler based on gcc-trunk Vincent R.
18:48 Re: any recent changes to gcc test builds Joel Sherrill
18:42 Re: Problem with a cross-compiler based on gcc-trunk Dave Korn
17:31 Re: Deprecating Itanium1 for GCC 4.4 Steve Ellcey
17:11 Re: Interpreting stack frame Peter Leist
16:58 Problem with a cross-compiler based on gcc-trunk Vincent R.
16:52 Re: Interpreting stack frame Andrew Haley
16:46 Re: Interpreting stack frame Peter Leist
16:39 Re: query automaton Vladimir Makarov
16:20 Re: any recent changes to gcc test builds Hans-Peter Nilsson
15:19 Re: any recent changes to gcc test builds Joel Sherrill
15:07 Re: any recent changes to gcc test builds Hans-Peter Nilsson
14:37 any recent changes to gcc test builds Joel Sherrill
14:28 Re: -fdump-translation-unit does'nt dump as expected. Diego Novillo
14:17 Re: -fdump-translation-unit does'nt dump as expected. Praveen D V
13:05 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Gabriel Dos Reis
13:00 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Richard Kenner
11:24 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Joel Sherrill
07:36 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Mathieu Lacage
07:25 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Joe Buck
07:16 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Joe Buck
07:08 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Joe Buck
06:54 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) NightStrike
06:52 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) NightStrike
06:45 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Joe Buck
06:39 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Joe Buck
06:32 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Joe Buck
02:25 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Gabriel Dos Reis
01:50 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Dave Korn
01:09 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Gabriel Dos Reis
00:54 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Ben Elliston

March 22, 2009
23:45 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Chris Lattner
23:35 Re: Playing with gcc-testresult results Laurent GUERBY
23:30 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Gabriel Dos Reis
23:22 Re: Playing with gcc-testresult results Ben Elliston
23:11 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Ben Elliston
23:03 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Daniel Berlin
23:01 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Daniel Berlin
22:57 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Jeff Law
22:51 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Jeff Law
22:45 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Gabriel Dos Reis
22:43 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Gabriel Dos Reis
22:42 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Jeff Law
22:41 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Jeff Law
22:38 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Jeff Law
21:31 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Gabriel Dos Reis
21:31 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Joseph S. Myers
21:22 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Richard Guenther
21:08 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Steven Bosscher
21:01 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Steven Bosscher
20:55 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Steven Bosscher
20:46 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Steven Bosscher
20:01 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Joern Rennecke
19:13 Re: cmath call builtin sqrtf but many platforms seem miss that(was Re: lrint lrintf problems ) Bernd Roesch
18:02 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Gabriel Dos Reis
17:39 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Richard Kenner
17:31 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Gabriel Dos Reis
17:20 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Richard Kenner
17:10 "Host/Target specific installation notes for GCC": broken link Dennis Schridde
17:06 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Gabriel Dos Reis
16:58 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Richard Kenner
16:55 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Paolo Bonzini
16:53 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Richard Kenner
16:53 Re: cmath call builtin sqrtf but many platforms seem miss that(was Re: lrint lrintf problems ) Gunther Nikl
16:52 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Gabriel Dos Reis
16:49 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Richard Kenner
16:47 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Richard Guenther
16:46 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Gabriel Dos Reis
16:39 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Gabriel Dos Reis
16:34 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Joseph S. Myers
16:30 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Richard Kenner
16:24 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Gabriel Dos Reis
16:03 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Richard Kenner
16:01 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Gabriel Dos Reis
15:59 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Richard Kenner
15:50 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Gabriel Dos Reis
15:38 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Paolo Bonzini
15:32 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Richard Kenner
15:23 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Gabriel Dos Reis
15:20 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Dominique Dhumieres
15:12 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Richard Kenner
15:12 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Gabriel Dos Reis
15:09 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Jeff Law
15:08 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Gabriel Dos Reis
15:07 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Richard Kenner
14:50 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Joel Sherrill
14:49 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Daniel Berlin
14:47 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Paolo Bonzini
14:36 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Richard Kenner
14:18 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Gabriel Dos Reis
13:46 Re: [gcc-in-cxx] bootstrap fails Daniel Berlin
12:54 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Richard Kenner
12:48 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Daniel Berlin
12:09 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Richard Kenner
12:08 Re: Is there any flags to disable warning and/or errors given by GCC 4.3.3? Ben Elliston
11:32 Re: correct way of having a function pointer inside a GTY()-ed struct? Joern Rennecke
07:36 Re: correct way of having a function pointer inside a GTY()-ed struct? Basile STARYNKEVITCH
06:37 Is there any flags to disable warning and/or errors given by GCC 4.3.3? Naganna
05:20 Re: correct way of having a function pointer inside a GTY()-ed struct? Joern Rennecke
05:00 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Joe Buck
04:30 Re: [gcc-in-cxx] bootstrap fails Jerry Quinn
04:11 Re: [gcc-in-cxx] bootstrap fails Ian Lance Taylor
04:03 Re: [gcc-in-cxx] bootstrap fails Jerry Quinn
02:37 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Daniel Berlin
00:54 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Mark Mitchell
00:46 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Steven Bosscher
00:39 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Richard Kenner
00:37 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) David Edelsohn
00:35 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Steven Bosscher
00:25 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Richard Kenner
00:14 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Mark Mitchell

March 21, 2009
23:54 Re: [gcc-in-cxx] bootstrap fails Jerry Quinn
23:45 Re: GCC 4.4 changes page needs updating H.J. Lu
23:07 Re: [gcc-in-cxx] bootstrap fails Joseph S. Myers
23:01 Re: [gcc-in-cxx] bootstrap fails Ian Lance Taylor
22:23 [gcc-in-cxx] bootstrap fails Jerry Quinn
19:40 Re: GCC 4.4 changes page needs updating Kai Tietz
18:37 Posix C++ integration Aayush saxena
18:09 Re: [fortran-dev] Fortran development branch created. H.J. Lu
17:13 Re: correct way of having a function pointer inside a GTY()-ed struct? Basile STARYNKEVITCH
17:09 Playing with gcc-testresult results Steven Bosscher
16:49 Re: GCC 4.4 changes page needs updating Joseph S. Myers
14:12 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Samuel Tardieu
13:24 Re: GCC 4.4 changes page needs updating Manuel López-Ibáñez
13:22 Re: correct way of having a function pointer inside a GTY()-ed struct? Richard Guenther
13:19 Re: correct way of having a function pointer inside a GTY()-ed struct? Basile STARYNKEVITCH
13:08 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Daniel Berlin
13:06 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Richard Kenner
13:06 GCC 4.4 changes page needs updating Steven Bosscher
13:00 Debuglocus Andrew MacLeod
12:46 Re: correct way of having a function pointer inside a GTY()-ed struct? Richard Guenther
12:40 Re: correct way of having a function pointer inside a GTY()-ed struct? Basile STARYNKEVITCH
12:36 Re: correct way of having a function pointer inside a GTY()-ed struct? Steven Bosscher
12:18 correct way of having a function pointer inside a GTY()-ed struct? Basile STARYNKEVITCH
10:59 Re: Syntactic sugar to access arrays and hashes in Objective-C John Holdsworth
09:07 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) NightStrike

March 20, 2009
23:25 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Mark Mitchell
23:03 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Richard Kenner
22:48 gcc-4.4-20090320 is now available gccadmin
19:32 Re: Deprecating Itanium1 for GCC 4.4 Steven Bosscher
19:20 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Dave Korn
19:07 Re : Deprecating Itanium1 for GCC 4.4 Arthur Loiret
18:51 Re: Deprecating Itanium1 for GCC 4.4 Laurent GUERBY
18:40 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Joe Buck
18:16 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Paolo Bonzini
18:11 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Jeff Law
18:09 Re: Deprecating Itanium1 for GCC 4.4 Steven Bosscher
18:08 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Jeff Law
18:05 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Steven Bosscher
18:02 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Steven Bosscher
16:59 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Joe Buck
16:55 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) David Edelsohn
16:49 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Richard Kenner
16:45 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Daniel Berlin
16:45 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Dave Korn
16:31 Re: Deprecating Itanium1 for GCC 4.4 Laurent GUERBY
16:29 Re: GCC C FRONT END EXPLANATION Dave Korn
16:09 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) David Edelsohn
15:54 Re: Interpreting stack frame Ian Lance Taylor
15:43 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Daniel Berlin
15:36 Re: GCC C FRONT END EXPLANATION Guilherme Puglia
15:27 Re: [PPL-devel] PPL broken for Canadian-cross builds Joseph S. Myers
15:20 Interpreting stack frame Peter Leist
15:17 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) David Edelsohn
14:56 Re: Deprecating Itanium1 for GCC 4.4 Steven Bosscher
14:52 Re: Deprecating Itanium1 for GCC 4.4 NightStrike
14:49 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Diego Novillo
14:33 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Ian Lance Taylor
14:25 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Andrew MacLeod
13:45 Re: Deprecating Itanium1 for GCC 4.4 H.J. Lu
13:35 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Daniel Berlin
13:35 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Joel Sherrill
13:22 Re: [PPL-devel] PPL broken for Canadian-cross builds Roberto Bagnara
12:57 Re: [PPL-devel] PPL broken for Canadian-cross builds Joseph S. Myers
12:51 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Joseph S. Myers
11:10 Re: Deprecating Itanium1 for GCC 4.4 Steven Bosscher
09:34 Re: Deprecating Itanium1 for GCC 4.4 Andi Kleen
07:34 Re: Proposed gfortran development branch Paolo Bonzini
06:06 Re: [PPL-devel] PPL broken for Canadian-cross builds Roberto Bagnara
05:10 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) NightStrike
05:04 Re: GCC C FRONT END EXPLANATION Dave Korn
03:58 [fortran-dev] Fortran development branch created. Jerry DeLisle
03:40 Re: GCC C FRONT END EXPLANATION Ben Elliston
03:38 Re: gcc c grammar Ben Elliston
02:49 GCC C FRONT END EXPLANATION Guilherme Puglia
02:32 Re: Proposed gfortran development branch Jerry DeLisle
02:29 gcc c grammar Eduardo Cruz

March 19, 2009
23:24 Re: Deprecating Itanium1 for GCC 4.4 Steven Bosscher
23:12 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Diego Novillo
22:54 gcc-4.3-20090319 is now available gccadmin
21:57 PPL broken for Canadian-cross builds Joseph S. Myers
21:25 Re: Proposed gfortran development branch Janis Johnson
20:27 Re: Google Summer of Code 2009 Tobias Grosser
20:06 Re: -fno-ira removal Joern Rennecke
19:44 Google Summer of Code 2009 Ian Lance Taylor
19:18 Fwd: Re: Proposed gfortran development branch Steven Bosscher
19:14 Re: Proposed gfortran development branch Ralf Wildenhues
19:13 Re: Proposed gfortran development branch NightStrike
19:06 Re: Proposed gfortran development branch Steve Kargl
18:48 Re: [cond-optab] update DJ Delorie
18:46 Re: Proposed gfortran development branch Toon Moene
18:31 Re: Problem when cross-compiling trunk in libgcc2.c Ozkan Sezer
18:30 [cond-optab] update Paolo Bonzini
18:25 Re: Problem when cross-compiling trunk in libgcc2.c Kai Tietz
18:24 Re: Problem when cross-compiling trunk in libgcc2.c Dave Korn
18:14 Re: Problem when cross-compiling trunk in libgcc2.c Ozkan Sezer
18:04 Re: Problem when cross-compiling trunk in libgcc2.c Vincent R.
17:58 Re: Problem when cross-compiling trunk in libgcc2.c Ozkan Sezer
17:01 Re: [plugins] two confusing plugin related branches Eric Christopher
16:13 Re: open source participation Joe Buck
15:23 Re: Automatic Parallelization & Graphite - future plans Cupertino Miranda
14:54 Re: Problem when cross-compiling trunk in libgcc2.c H.J. Lu
14:49 Problem when cross-compiling trunk in libgcc2.c Vincent R.
12:21 Re: open source participation satyaakam goswami
12:14 Re: [plugins] two confusing plugin related branches Diego Novillo
11:16 open source participation bajrang kumar
09:51 Re: OpenMP to GPGPU langauges Antoniu Pop
09:40 Re: OpenMP to GPGPU langauges Naganna
09:32 [plugins] two confusing plugin related branches Basile STARYNKEVITCH
08:40 Re: OpenMP to GPGPU langauges Antoniu Pop
07:16 OpenMP to GPGPU langauges Naganna
06:59 Re: Automatic Parallelization & Graphite - future plans Paolo Bonzini
01:38 Re: Call for MPC complex math library GCC testers on various platforms Kaveh R. GHAZI
00:41 Re: multiple backend support (Was: Re: Automatic Parallelization & Graphite - future plans) Joseph S. Myers
00:24 multiple backend support (Was: Re: Automatic Parallelization & Graphite - future plans) Joern Rennecke

March 18, 2009
23:56 Re: Automatic Parallelization & Graphite - future plans Albert Cohen
23:05 Re: Automatic Parallelization & Graphite - future plans Steven Bosscher
23:00 Re: gcj -v --help: ecj switches Andrew Haley
22:49 gcc-4.2-20090318 is now available gccadmin
21:10 Re: gcj -v --help: ecj switches Ralf Wildenhues
20:08 Re: Call for MPC complex math library GCC testers on various platforms Ralf Wildenhues
19:49 Re: Automatic Parallelization & Graphite - future plans Razya Ladelsky
19:18 Re: Automatic Parallelization & Graphite - future plans Albert Cohen
18:42 Re: [Fwd: gomp - cost of threadprivate data access] Jakub Jelinek
17:17 Call for MPC complex math library GCC testers on various platforms Kaveh Ghazi
16:56 Re: Automatic Parallelization & Graphite - future plans Antoniu Pop
13:49 Re: Automatic Parallelization & Graphite - future plans Joern Rennecke
10:17 Re: query automaton Alex Turjan

March 17, 2009
23:28 Re: generic bug in fixed-point constant folding Sean D'Epagnier
18:45 RE: generic bug in fixed-point constant folding Fu, Chao-Ying
17:12 Re: Is const_int zero extended or sign-extended? Dave Korn
16:40 Paypal Inc. Paypal Inc.
15:25 Re: Fwd: Mips, -fpie and TLS management Daniel Jacobowitz
15:21 Re: Fwd: Mips, -fpie and TLS management Joel Porquet
15:10 Re: Fwd: Mips, -fpie and TLS management Daniel Jacobowitz
15:03 Re: Fwd: Mips, -fpie and TLS management Joel Porquet
14:39 Re: Fwd: Mips, -fpie and TLS management Daniel Jacobowitz
13:37 RE: Is const_int zero extended or sign-extended? Bingfeng Mei
10:51 Re: improve -fverbose-asm option Eric Fisher
09:56 RE: Understand BLKmode and returning structure in register. Bingfeng Mei
09:26 Re: Fwd: Mips, -fpie and TLS management Joel Porquet
08:05 Re: help for arm avr bfin cris frv h8300 m68k mcore mmix pdp11 rs6000 sh vax Gabriel Paubert
06:22 Re: Constant folding and Constant propagation Adam Nemet
03:17 generic bug in fixed-point constant folding Sean D'Epagnier

March 16, 2009
22:12 Re: Understand BLKmode and returning structure in register. Richard Sandiford
19:11 Difference between local/global/parameter array handling Jean Christophe Beyler
18:21 Re: Preprocessor for assembler macros? Ian Lance Taylor
18:18 Re: improve -fverbose-asm option Ian Lance Taylor
18:16 Re: [Fwd: gomp - cost of threadprivate data access] Steven Bosscher
18:07 [Fwd: gomp - cost of threadprivate data access] Toon Moene
17:24 Re: Fwd: Mips, -fpie and TLS management Daniel Jacobowitz
17:19 Re: Fwd: Mips, -fpie and TLS management Joel Porquet
17:02 Re: ARM compiler rewriting code to be longer and slower Daniel Berlin
16:28 Re: ARM compiler rewriting code to be longer and slower Steven Bosscher
16:12 RE: ARM compiler rewriting code to be longer and slower Adam Nemet
16:07 Re: Typo or intended? Andrew Haley
16:02 Re: sign/zero extension of function arguments on x86-64 Rafael Espindola
15:53 Typo or intended? Bingfeng Mei
15:51 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Jack Howarth
14:44 Re: Dose gcc provide any function to build def-use chain in RTL form Paolo Bonzini
14:01 Dose gcc provide any function to build def-use chain in RTL form villa gogh
13:52 RE: ARM compiler rewriting code to be longer and slower Ramana Radhakrishnan
13:01 Re: -mfpmath=sse,387 is experimental ? Tim Prince
11:49 Re: help for arm avr bfin cris frv h8300 m68k mcore mmix pdp11 rs6000 sh vax Martin Guy
10:09 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Paolo Bonzini
10:03 Re: -mfpmath=sse,387 is experimental ? Zuxy Meng
09:50 Re: Preprocessor for assembler macros? Ph . Marek
09:28 Re: help for arm avr bfin cris frv h8300 m68k mcore mmix pdp11 rs6000 sh vax Paolo Bonzini
09:12 Re: help for arm avr bfin cris frv h8300 m68k mcore mmix pdp11 rs6000 sh vax Martin Guy
06:11 improve -fverbose-asm option Eric Fisher
04:20 Re: help for arm avr bfin cris frv h8300 m68k mcore mmix pdp11 rs6000 sh vax Hans-Peter Nilsson
03:42 Re: ARM compiler rewriting code to be longer and slower Adam Nemet
00:29 Re: How to test SH64 on a simulator Kaz Kojima

March 15, 2009
23:51 Re: How to test SH64 on a simulator Steven Bosscher
23:42 Re: ARM compiler rewriting code to be longer and slower Steven Bosscher
23:27 Re: How to test SH64 on a simulator Kaz Kojima
22:42 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) NightStrike
22:19 Re: ARM compiler rewriting code to be longer and slower Ramana Radhakrishnan
22:15 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Gerald Pfeifer
21:19 Re: Deprecating Itanium1 for GCC 4.4 Joel Sherrill
20:39 Re: Deprecating Itanium1 for GCC 4.4 Gerald Pfeifer
18:36 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Dominique Dhumieres
17:47 Re: Deprecating Itanium1 for GCC 4.4 Steven Bosscher
17:14 Re: Deprecating Itanium1 for GCC 4.4 Steven Bosscher
17:09 Re: Deprecating Itanium1 for GCC 4.4 Joseph S. Myers
16:20 Re: Deprecating Itanium1 for GCC 4.4 Richard Guenther
16:16 Deprecating Itanium1 for GCC 4.4 Steven Bosscher
15:58 How to test SH64 on a simulator Steven Bosscher

March 14, 2009
16:48 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) NightStrike
14:01 Re: Constant folding and Constant propagation Jean Christophe Beyler
13:21 Re: help for arm avr bfin cris frv h8300 m68k mcore mmix pdp11 rs6000 sh vax Denis Chertykov
12:06 Re: help for arm avr bfin cris frv h8300 m68k mcore mmix pdp11 rs6000 sh vax Paolo Bonzini
11:59 Re: help for arm avr bfin cris frv h8300 m68k mcore mmix pdp11 rs6000 sh vax Hans-Peter Nilsson
10:05 Re: gcj -v --help: ecj switches Andrew Haley
09:38 Re: gcj -v --help: ecj switches Ralf Wildenhues

March 13, 2009
22:49 gcc-4.4-20090313 is now available gccadmin
22:43 Re: how to report a bug which doesn't happen on the .ii file generated with -save-temps? Francesco Montorsi
21:03 Re: Constant folding and Constant propagation Jean Christophe Beyler
21:03 Re: how to report a bug which doesn't happen on the .ii file generated with -save-temps? Ian Lance Taylor
20:02 how to report a bug which doesn't happen on the .ii file generated with -save-temps? Francesco Montorsi
19:32 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Toon Moene
19:29 sign/zero extension of function arguments on x86-64 Rafael Espindola
19:02 Re: help for arm avr bfin cris frv h8300 m68k mcore mmix pdp11 rs6000 sh vax Laurent Desnogues
18:42 Re: help for arm avr bfin cris frv h8300 m68k mcore mmix pdp11 rs6000 sh vax Hans-Peter Nilsson
18:33 Re: help for arm avr bfin cris frv h8300 m68k mcore mmix pdp11 rs6000 sh vax Joseph S. Myers
18:28 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Joe Buck
18:23 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Steven Bosscher
18:23 Re: help for arm avr bfin cris frv h8300 m68k mcore mmix pdp11 rs6000 sh vax Andreas Schwab
18:19 Re: help for arm avr bfin cris frv h8300 m68k mcore mmix pdp11 rs6000 sh vax Richard Guenther
18:14 Re: help for arm avr bfin cris frv h8300 m68k mcore mmix pdp11 rs6000 sh vax Joseph S. Myers
18:03 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Joe Buck
17:58 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Joseph S. Myers
17:52 Re: help for arm avr bfin cris frv h8300 m68k mcore mmix pdp11 rs6000 sh vax Paolo Bonzini
17:49 Re: help for arm avr bfin cris frv h8300 m68k mcore mmix pdp11 rs6000 sh vax Paul Koning
17:48 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Steven Bosscher
17:37 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Dave Korn
17:36 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Dave Korn
17:35 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Daniel Jacobowitz
17:34 RE: Understand BLKmode and returning structure in register. Bingfeng Mei
17:33 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Richard Guenther
17:29 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Janis Johnson
17:25 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Richard Guenther
17:23 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Dave Korn
17:22 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Steven Bosscher
17:19 Re: help for arm avr bfin cris frv h8300 m68k mcore mmix pdp11 rs6000 sh vax Matt Thomas
17:06 Re: help for arm avr bfin cris frv h8300 m68k mcore mmix pdp11 rs6000 sh vax Paolo Bonzini
16:42 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Manuel López-Ibáñez
16:35 Understand BLKmode and returning structure in register. Bingfeng Mei
16:30 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Steven Bosscher
16:12 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) DJ Delorie
16:04 GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Richard Guenther
15:51 Re: help for arm avr bfin cris frv h8300 m68k mcore mmix pdp11 rs6000 sh vax Michael Meissner
15:43 Re: recent regression on darwin Kaveh R. GHAZI
15:26 Re: help for arm avr bfin cris frv h8300 m68k mcore mmix pdp11 rs6000 sh vax Kaz Kojima
15:14 Re: help for arm avr bfin cris frv h8300 m68k mcore mmix pdp11 rs6000 sh vax Richard Guenther
15:07 Re: help for arm avr bfin cris frv h8300 m68k mcore mmix pdp11 rs6000 sh vax Paolo Bonzini
14:17 Re: help for arm avr bfin cris frv h8300 m68k mcore mmix pdp11 rs6000 sh vax Richard Guenther
14:03 Re: help for arm avr bfin cris frv h8300 m68k mcore mmix pdp11 rs6000 sh vax Paolo Bonzini
13:56 Re: help for arm avr bfin cris frv h8300 m68k mcore mmix pdp11 rs6000 sh vax Richard Earnshaw
13:37 Re: help for arm avr bfin cris frv h8300 m68k mcore mmix pdp11 rs6000 sh vax Paolo Bonzini
13:22 Re: help for arm avr bfin cris frv h8300 m68k mcore mmix pdp11 rs6000 sh vax Paolo Bonzini
13:15 Re: help for arm avr bfin cris frv h8300 m68k mcore mmix pdp11 rs6000 sh vax Bernd Schmidt
13:13 Re: help for arm avr bfin cris frv h8300 m68k mcore mmix pdp11 rs6000 sh vax Ian Lance Taylor
12:55 Re: help for arm avr bfin cris frv h8300 m68k mcore mmix pdp11 rs6000 sh vax Kaz Kojima
12:52 Re: missing return statement Dave Korn
11:43 [Cross toolchains] Multiarch and cross toolchains compatibility Hector Oron
11:35 help for arm avr bfin cris frv h8300 m68k mcore mmix pdp11 rs6000 sh vax Paolo Bonzini
11:33 ld fails to look under /usr/$arch-linux-gnu/lib64 Hector Oron
11:05 Re: missing return statement Andreas Schwab
09:21 Re: [lto] RFC: How should gimple represent enums? Richard Guenther
07:57 Re: [PATCH] SMS - Pass the actual schedulable rows to compute_split_row Ayal Zaks
06:43 Re: missing return statement James Dennett
06:20 Re: missing return statement Dave Korn
05:51 [PATCH] SMS - Pass the actual schedulable rows to compute_split_row Revital1 Eres
05:36 RE: missing return statement Nathan Ridge
05:30 Re: missing return statement James Dennett
04:36 Re: ARM compiler rewriting code to be longer and slower Ian Lance Taylor
03:56 Re: recent regression on darwin H.J. Lu
03:47 ARM compiler rewriting code to be longer and slower zoltan
03:39 Re: [newb] GCC machine description help, modifying existing md dhua026 dhua026
02:43 Re: recent regression on darwin H.J. Lu
01:29 Re: [newb] GCC machine description help, modifying existing md Ian Lance Taylor
01:11 recent regression on darwin Jack Howarth

March 12, 2009
23:56 Re: missing return statement Robert Dewar
23:54 Re: missing return statement Ben Elliston
23:52 [newb] GCC machine description help, modifying existing md dhua026 dhua026
23:42 missing return statement Nathan Ridge
22:51 gcc-4.3-20090312 is now available gccadmin
20:56 Re: finding gcc's installation prefix Ian Lance Taylor
20:24 finding gcc's installation prefix Paul Jarc
20:20 Re: Revision 144098 (d.d. Wed Feb 11 08:56:41 2009 UTC (4 weeks ago)) is not a regression bug fix. Toon Moene
19:00 Re: Adding a function call at the beginning fearyourself
17:43 Re: Is const_int zero extended or sign-extended? Dave Korn
17:43 Re: [lto] RFC: How should gimple represent enums? Gabriel Dos Reis
17:25 Is const_int zero extended or sign-extended? Bingfeng Mei
17:12 Re: [lto] RFC: How should gimple represent enums? Diego Novillo
17:12 Re: [lto] RFC: How should gimple represent enums? Diego Novillo
17:08 Re: [lto] RFC: How should gimple represent enums? Steven Bosscher
17:08 Re: [lto] RFC: How should gimple represent enums? Joseph S. Myers
16:51 Re: [lto] RFC: How should gimple represent enums? Diego Novillo
16:48 Re: C++ FE stripping const qualifiers from function prototypes (bug or feature?) Daniel Berlin
16:46 Re: [lto] RFC: How should gimple represent enums? Steven Bosscher
16:41 [lto][testsuite]: Handling multi-language test cases? Diego Novillo
16:39 Re: Fwd: Mips, -fpie and TLS management Daniel Jacobowitz
16:38 Re: Adding a function call at the beginning Sebastian Pop
16:37 [lto] RFC: How should gimple represent enums? Diego Novillo
16:09 Re: Revision 144098 (d.d. Wed Feb 11 08:56:41 2009 UTC (4 weeks ago)) is not a regression bug fix. H.J. Lu
15:58 Re: Revision 144098 (d.d. Wed Feb 11 08:56:41 2009 UTC (4 weeks ago)) is not a regression bug fix. H.J. Lu
15:58 Adding a function call at the beginning fearyourself
15:41 Re: C++ FE stripping const qualifiers from function prototypes (bug or feature?) Dave Korn
15:16 Re: C++ FE stripping const qualifiers from function prototypes (bug or feature?) Mark Mitchell
15:05 Re: C++ FE stripping const qualifiers from function prototypes (bug or feature?) Daniel Berlin
15:01 Re: C++ FE stripping const qualifiers from function prototypes (bug or feature?) Diego Novillo
15:00 Re: Revision 144098 (d.d. Wed Feb 11 08:56:41 2009 UTC (4 weeks ago)) is not a regression bug fix. Richard Guenther
14:56 Re: Revision 144098 (d.d. Wed Feb 11 08:56:41 2009 UTC (4 weeks ago)) is not a regression bug fix. Steven Bosscher
14:51 Re: C++ FE stripping const qualifiers from function prototypes (bug or feature?) Gabriel Dos Reis
14:38 Re: C++ FE stripping const qualifiers from function prototypes (bug or feature?) Diego Novillo
14:34 Re: Revision 144098 (d.d. Wed Feb 11 08:56:41 2009 UTC (4 weeks ago)) is not a regression bug fix. Paolo Bonzini
14:29 Re: C++ FE stripping const qualifiers from function prototypes (bug or feature?) Mark Mitchell
14:11 Re: C++ FE stripping const qualifiers from function prototypes (bug or feature?) Diego Novillo
14:09 Re: C++ FE stripping const qualifiers from function prototypes (bug or feature?) Michael Veksler
14:06 Re: Revision 144098 (d.d. Wed Feb 11 08:56:41 2009 UTC (4 weeks ago)) is not a regression bug fix. H.J. Lu
14:03 Re: Revision 144098 (d.d. Wed Feb 11 08:56:41 2009 UTC (4 weeks ago)) is not a regression bug fix. Paolo Bonzini
13:54 Re: Revision 144098 (d.d. Wed Feb 11 08:56:41 2009 UTC (4 weeks ago)) is not a regression bug fix. H.J. Lu
13:52 Re: How to use a scratch register in "jump" pattern ? Stelian Pop
13:42 Re: C++ FE stripping const qualifiers from function prototypes (bug or feature?) Diego Novillo
13:41 Re: Revision 144098 (d.d. Wed Feb 11 08:56:41 2009 UTC (4 weeks ago)) is not a regression bug fix. H.J. Lu
13:39 Re: Revision 144098 (d.d. Wed Feb 11 08:56:41 2009 UTC (4 weeks ago)) is not a regression bug fix. H.J. Lu
13:33 Re: C++ FE stripping const qualifiers from function prototypes (bug or feature?) Paolo Carlini
13:02 Re: Fwd: Mips, -fpie and TLS management Joel Porquet
12:53 Re: Revision 144098 (d.d. Wed Feb 11 08:56:41 2009 UTC (4 weeks ago)) is not a regression bug fix. Toon Moene
10:42 C++ FE stripping const qualifiers from function prototypes (bug or feature?) Diego Novillo
10:30 Re: Revision 144098 (d.d. Wed Feb 11 08:56:41 2009 UTC (4 weeks ago)) is not a regression bug fix. Paolo Bonzini
10:12 Re: Undocumented and used behaviour (was: Re: GCC-only software) Etienne Lorrain
09:18 Re: -mfpmath=sse,387 is experimental ? Timothy Madden
08:49 Re: Revision 144098 (d.d. Wed Feb 11 08:56:41 2009 UTC (4 weeks ago)) is not a regression bug fix. Toon Moene
08:40 Re: Revision 144098 (d.d. Wed Feb 11 08:56:41 2009 UTC (4 weeks ago)) is not a regression bug fix. Paolo Bonzini
08:33 Re: Revision 144098 (d.d. Wed Feb 11 08:56:41 2009 UTC (4 weeks ago)) is not a regression bug fix. Paolo Bonzini
07:38 Re: Revision 144098 (d.d. Wed Feb 11 08:56:41 2009 UTC (4 weeks ago)) is not a regression bug fix. Paolo Bonzini
01:37 Re: Revision 144098 (d.d. Wed Feb 11 08:56:41 2009 UTC (4 weeks ago)) is not a regression bug fix. H.J. Lu

March 11, 2009
23:30 Re: Revision 144098 (d.d. Wed Feb 11 08:56:41 2009 UTC (4 weeks ago)) is not a regression bug fix. H.J. Lu
23:20 Re: Revision 144098 (d.d. Wed Feb 11 08:56:41 2009 UTC (4 weeks ago)) is not a regression bug fix. Toon Moene
23:15 Re: -mfpmath=sse,387 is experimental ? Jan Hubicka
23:08 Re: Revision 144098 (d.d. Wed Feb 11 08:56:41 2009 UTC (4 weeks ago)) is not a regression bug fix. H.J. Lu
23:00 Re: Revision 144098 (d.d. Wed Feb 11 08:56:41 2009 UTC (4 weeks ago)) is not a regression bug fix. Toon Moene
22:53 Re: Revision 144098 (d.d. Wed Feb 11 08:56:41 2009 UTC (4 weeks ago)) is not a regression bug fix. H.J. Lu
22:42 gcc-4.2-20090311 is now available gccadmin
22:32 Re: Revision 144098 (d.d. Wed Feb 11 08:56:41 2009 UTC (4 weeks ago)) is not a regression bug fix. Steven Bosscher
22:27 Re: Revision 144098 (d.d. Wed Feb 11 08:56:41 2009 UTC (4 weeks ago)) is not a regression bug fix. Steven Bosscher
22:24 Se busca Tomas Chevez
22:22 Re: Revision 144098 (d.d. Wed Feb 11 08:56:41 2009 UTC (4 weeks ago)) is not a regression bug fix. Richard Guenther
22:20 Re: Revision 144098 (d.d. Wed Feb 11 08:56:41 2009 UTC (4 weeks ago)) is not a regression bug fix. Toon Moene
22:17 Re: Revision 144098 (d.d. Wed Feb 11 08:56:41 2009 UTC (4 weeks ago)) is not a regression bug fix. Toon Moene
22:10 Re: Revision 144098 (d.d. Wed Feb 11 08:56:41 2009 UTC (4 weeks ago)) is not a regression bug fix. Richard Guenther
22:03 Re: Revision 144098 (d.d. Wed Feb 11 08:56:41 2009 UTC (4 weeks ago)) is not a regression bug fix. Steven Bosscher
21:54 Revision 144098 (d.d. Wed Feb 11 08:56:41 2009 UTC (4 weeks ago)) is not a regression bug fix. Toon Moene
17:47 Re: Undocumented and used behaviour (was: Re: GCC-only software) Ian Lance Taylor
17:22 Re: Near 1000 arm-eabi neon FAIL in C testsuite (PR38697 and PR39361) Laurent GUERBY
17:10 Re: Undocumented and used behaviour (was: Re: GCC-only software) Andreas Schwab
16:26 Undocumented and used behaviour (was: Re: GCC-only software) Etienne Lorrain
14:39 cond-optab patch series Paolo Bonzini
14:34 Re: How to use a scratch register in "jump" pattern ? Ulrich Weigand
13:55 Re: fbranch-probabilities bug Hariharan Sandanagobalane
13:39 Re: Fwd: Mips, -fpie and TLS management Daniel Jacobowitz
13:24 Re: bitfields: types vs modes? Hans-Peter Nilsson
12:01 Re: How to use a scratch register in "jump" pattern ? Dave Korn
11:57 Re: bitfields: types vs modes? Laurent GUERBY
11:47 Re: Automatic Parallelization & Graphite - future plans Razya Ladelsky
10:47 Re: bitfields: types vs modes? Paul Brook
10:03 Re: Fwd: Mips, -fpie and TLS management Joel Porquet
09:43 Re: How to use a scratch register in "jump" pattern ? Stelian Pop
07:42 Re: softfloat symbol visibility in libgcc.a/libgcc_s.so (fp-bit/dp-bit) Mike Frysinger
07:36 Re: How to use a scratch register in "jump" pattern ? Georg-Johann Lay
05:05 Re: bitfields: types vs modes? DJ Delorie
04:23 Re: bitfields: types vs modes? Hans-Peter Nilsson
02:55 Re: softfloat symbol visibility in libgcc.a/libgcc_s.so (fp-bit/dp-bit) Joseph S. Myers
02:33 Re: softfloat symbol visibility in libgcc.a/libgcc_s.so (fp-bit/dp-bit) Mike Frysinger
01:44 Re: softfloat symbol visibility in libgcc.a/libgcc_s.so (fp-bit/dp-bit) Joseph S. Myers
00:59 Re: [c++0x] DR 387 implementation in <complex> incomplete. Paolo Carlini
00:57 softfloat symbol visibility in libgcc.a/libgcc_s.so (fp-bit/dp-bit) Mike Frysinger

March 10, 2009
22:56 Re: How to use a scratch register in "jump" pattern ? Stelian Pop
21:20 Re: How to use a scratch register in "jump" pattern ? Georg-Johann Lay
21:17 Re: variadic templates supported in non-c++0x mode Jonathan Wakely
20:36 [c++0x] DR 387 implementation in <complex> incomplete. Jan van Dijk
20:04 Re: [RFC] Unused variable in profile.c Andrew Pinski
19:58 [RFC] Unused variable in profile.c Edmar Wienskoski
19:25 The Linux binutils 2.19.51.0.3 is released H.J. Lu
18:50 Re: Setting -frounding-math by default Gabriel Dos Reis
18:28 Re: Setting -frounding-math by default Sylvain Pion
18:10 Re: Setting -frounding-math by default Sylvain Pion
17:43 Re: How to use a scratch register in "jump" pattern ? Stelian Pop
17:37 Re: Setting -frounding-math by default Gabriel Dos Reis
17:35 Re: Setting -frounding-math by default Gabriel Dos Reis
17:16 Re: variadic templates supported in non-c++0x mode Jason Merrill
17:11 Re: How to use a scratch register in "jump" pattern ? Dave Korn
17:03 Re: Setting -frounding-math by default Andrew Haley
16:45 How to use a scratch register in "jump" pattern ? Stelian Pop
16:41 Re: Setting -frounding-math by default Sylvain Pion
16:38 Re: cmath call builtin sqrtf but many platforms seem miss that(was Re: lrint lrintf problems ) Ian Lance Taylor
16:31 Re: Setting -frounding-math by default Sylvain Pion
16:28 Re: Setting -frounding-math by default Gabriel Dos Reis
16:07 Re: Setting -frounding-math by default Richard Guenther
15:45 Re: Setting -frounding-math by default Sylvain Pion
15:06 Re: cmath call builtin sqrtf but many platforms seem miss that(was Re: lrint lrintf problems ) Gabriel Dos Reis
15:03 Re: variadic templates supported in non-c++0x mode Gabriel Dos Reis
15:03 Re: cmath call builtin sqrtf but many platforms seem miss that(was Re: lrint lrintf problems ) Bernd Roesch
14:54 Re: Automatic Parallelization & Graphite - future plans Tobias Grosser
14:18 Implicit conversion from 32bits integer to 16bits integer (GCC 4.3.3) Frederic Belouin
14:14 Automatic Parallelization & Graphite - future plans Razya Ladelsky
14:02 Re: pr39339 - invalid testcase or SRA bug? Hariharan Sandanagobalane
14:02 Re: variadic templates supported in non-c++0x mode Sylvain Pion
14:01 Re: variadic templates supported in non-c++0x mode Sylvain Pion
13:58 Re: pr39339 - invalid testcase or SRA bug? Jakub Jelinek
13:57 Re: variadic templates supported in non-c++0x mode Manuel López-Ibáñez
13:55 Re: variadic templates supported in non-c++0x mode Gabriel Dos Reis
13:47 Re: pr39339 - invalid testcase or SRA bug? Richard Guenther
13:44 pr39339 - invalid testcase or SRA bug? Hariharan Sandanagobalane
13:24 Re: No address_cost calls when inlining ? Jean Christophe Beyler
13:17 Ira Rosen appointed Auto-Vectorizer Maintainer David Edelsohn
12:58 Re: variadic templates supported in non-c++0x mode Sylvain Pion
12:48 Re: variadic templates supported in non-c++0x mode Manuel López-Ibáñez
12:12 Re: variadic templates supported in non-c++0x mode Paolo Carlini
12:08 Re: variadic templates supported in non-c++0x mode Sylvain Pion
11:50 Re: variadic templates supported in non-c++0x mode Paolo Carlini
11:42 Re: variadic templates supported in non-c++0x mode Manuel López-Ibáñez
11:31 Re: [patch][4.5] Make regmove cfglayout-safe Paolo Bonzini
11:19 Re: variadic templates supported in non-c++0x mode Paolo Carlini
10:56 variadic templates supported in non-c++0x mode Jan van Dijk
08:18 Re: No address_cost calls when inlining ? Paolo Bonzini
04:33 Re: The gcc-in-cxx branch now completes bootstrap Ben Elliston
04:33 bitfields: types vs modes? DJ Delorie
04:29 Re: Setting -frounding-math by default Joseph S. Myers
04:27 Re: Setting -frounding-math by default Joseph S. Myers
04:25 Re: The gcc-in-cxx branch now completes bootstrap Ian Lance Taylor
00:16 Re: The gcc-in-cxx branch now completes bootstrap Ben Elliston

March 09, 2009
21:27 Re: TREE_ADDRESSABLE types and SRA? Andrew Pinski
21:21 TREE_ADDRESSABLE types and SRA? Martin Jambor
20:02 Re: Setting -frounding-math by default Paolo Bonzini
19:58 No address_cost calls when inlining ? Jean Christophe Beyler
19:19 Re: Setting -frounding-math by default Sylvain Pion
19:14 Re: Setting -frounding-math by default Sylvain Pion
19:07 Re: Setting -frounding-math by default Paolo Bonzini
18:46 Re: Setting -frounding-math by default Sylvain Pion
17:51 Re: cmath call builtin sqrtf but many platforms seem miss that(was Re: lrint lrintf problems ) Gabriel Dos Reis
17:51 RE: [gcov] "stamp mismatch with graph file" Verweij, Arjen
17:45 Re: GCC-only software Andrew Pinski
15:03 Re: cmath call builtin sqrtf but many platforms seem miss that(was Re: lrint lrintf problems ) Richard Guenther
14:59 Re: cmath call builtin sqrtf but many platforms seem miss that(was Re: lrint lrintf problems ) Gabriel Dos Reis
14:23 Re: cmath call builtin sqrtf but many platforms seem miss that(was Re: lrint lrintf problems ) Bernd Roesch
13:41 Re: GCC-only software Paolo Bonzini
13:03 Re: GCC-only software Piotr Wyderski
12:36 Re: GCC-only software Manuel López-Ibáñez
11:43 GCC-only software Piotr Wyderski
10:53 Re: cmath call builtin sqrtf but many platforms seem miss that(was Re: lrint lrintf problems ) Gabriel Dos Reis
10:45 Re: -mfpmath=sse,387 is experimental ? Timothy Madden
10:28 Re: GCC 4.4 is not able to build itself under Cygwin Piotr Wyderski
09:51 Re: Setting -frounding-math by default Richard Guenther
09:43 cmath call builtin sqrtf but many platforms seem miss that(was Re: lrint lrintf problems ) Bernd Roesch
09:13 Re: -mfpmath=sse,387 is experimental ? Paolo Bonzini
07:38 Re: Preprocessor for assembler macros? Philipp Marek
05:17 Re: Preprocessor for assembler macros? Ian Lance Taylor
05:02 Re: The gcc-in-cxx branch now completes bootstrap Ian Lance Taylor
05:02 Re: The gcc-in-cxx branch now completes bootstrap Ian Lance Taylor
00:09 Re: Setting -frounding-math by default Joseph S. Myers
00:08 Re: Setting -frounding-math by default Joseph S. Myers

March 08, 2009
23:29 Re: Setting -frounding-math by default Steven Bosscher
23:24 Re: Setting -frounding-math by default Joseph S. Myers
22:43 Re: Setting -frounding-math by default Andrew Thomas Pinski
22:41 Re: Setting -frounding-math by default Richard Guenther
22:26 Re: Setting -frounding-math by default Sylvain Pion
21:45 Re: Near 1000 arm-eabi neon FAIL in C testsuite (PR38697 and PR39361) Richard Guenther
21:19 Near 1000 arm-eabi neon FAIL in C testsuite (PR38697 and PR39361) Laurent GUERBY
19:47 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-02-16) Mark Mitchell
19:26 Re: Setting -frounding-math by default Joseph S. Myers
19:18 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-02-16) Toon Moene
19:11 Setting -frounding-math by default Sylvain Pion
18:04 Re: Preprocessor for assembler macros? Carl
17:41 Re: Preprocessor for assembler macros? Carl
14:30 nothrow (cross-posted to gcc-help) Michael Sullivan
11:07 Re: [RFC] Better debug info by substitution tracking for inliner (and other passes eliminating whole user variables) Jan Hubicka
10:32 Preprocessor for assembler macros? Philipp Marek
00:36 Re: C++ constant expressions in __attribute__ Gabriel Dos Reis

March 07, 2009
22:45 Re: C++ constant expressions in __attribute__ Joseph S. Myers
22:32 Re: C++ constant expressions in __attribute__ Gabriel Dos Reis
21:40 Re: C++ constant expressions in __attribute__ Joseph S. Myers
21:19 Re: C++ constant expressions in __attribute__ Gabriel Dos Reis
21:12 Re: The gcc-in-cxx branch now completes bootstrap Gabriel Dos Reis
20:02 -mfpmath=sse,387 is experimental ? Timothy Madden
17:34 Re: The gcc-in-cxx branch now completes bootstrap Laurent GUERBY
16:58 Re: Handling of extern inline in c99 mode Dave Korn
15:20 Re: The gcc-in-cxx branch now completes bootstrap Kaveh R. GHAZI
14:50 Handling of extern inline in c99 mode Bernd Roesch
13:13 bitwise dataflow analysis Kenneth Zadeck
08:26 Re: bitwise dataflow Paolo Bonzini
03:41 Re: bitwise dataflow Andrew Thomas Pinski
03:29 Re: bitwise dataflow John Regehr
03:00 bitwise dataflow Silvius Rus
02:45 The gcc-in-cxx branch now completes bootstrap Ian Lance Taylor
01:21 Re: New no-undefined-overflow branch Joseph S. Myers

March 06, 2009
22:46 gcc-4.4-20090306 is now available gccadmin
22:40 Re: New no-undefined-overflow branch Richard Guenther
20:42 Re: New no-undefined-overflow branch Geert Bosch
19:53 Re: Minimum required GNAT version for bootstrap of GNAT on gcc trunk Dave Korn
19:34 Re: New no-undefined-overflow branch Robert Dewar
19:28 Re: New no-undefined-overflow branch Ian Lance Taylor
19:25 Re: New no-undefined-overflow branch Paolo Bonzini
18:54 Re: [RFC] Better debug info by substitution tracking for inliner (and other passes eliminating whole user variables) Alexandre Oliva
18:47 Re: Minimum required GNAT version for bootstrap of GNAT on gcc trunk Laurent GUERBY
18:36 Re: New no-undefined-overflow branch Richard Earnshaw
18:11 Re: New no-undefined-overflow branch Paolo Bonzini
17:52 Re: New no-undefined-overflow branch Joseph S. Myers
17:42 [plugins] [patch] allows to see AST in C kenji koyanagi
17:38 Re: New no-undefined-overflow branch Paolo Bonzini
17:25 Re: New no-undefined-overflow branch Joseph S. Myers
17:23 Re: New no-undefined-overflow branch Joseph S. Myers
17:21 Re: New no-undefined-overflow branch Joseph S. Myers
17:17 Re: New no-undefined-overflow branch Joseph S. Myers
16:19 Re: New no-undefined-overflow branch Geert Bosch
15:58 Re: New no-undefined-overflow branch Geert Bosch
15:39 Re: New no-undefined-overflow branch Richard Guenther
15:23 Re: New no-undefined-overflow branch Ian Lance Taylor
15:10 Re: New no-undefined-overflow branch Paolo Bonzini
14:44 Re: New no-undefined-overflow branch Richard Guenther
14:29 Re: New no-undefined-overflow branch Paolo Bonzini
14:16 Re: New no-undefined-overflow branch Joseph S. Myers
14:10 Re: GCC 4.4 is not able to build itself under Cygwin Dave Korn
14:02 Re: New no-undefined-overflow branch Richard Guenther
13:54 Re: GCC 4.4 is not able to build itself under Cygwin Dave Korn
13:51 Re: New no-undefined-overflow branch Joseph S. Myers
13:08 Re: GCC 4.4 is not able to build itself under Cygwin Richard Guenther
13:05 Re: GCC 4.4 is not able to build itself under Cygwin Piotr Wyderski
12:55 Re: GCC 4.4 is not able to build itself under Cygwin Richard Guenther
12:48 GCC 4.4 is not able to build itself under Cygwin Piotr Wyderski
12:34 Re: lrint lrintf problems Richard Guenther
12:28 lrint lrintf problems Bernd Roesch
09:11 Re: New no-undefined-overflow branch Richard Guenther
05:15 default_function_rodata_section bug? DJ Delorie

March 05, 2009
22:49 gcc-4.3-20090305 is now available gccadmin
20:36 Libgomp ANSI/IEEE POSIX 1003.1 Takis Psarogiannakopoulos
20:04 Re: GCC 4.3.X libgomp Takis Psarogiannakopoulos
19:08 Re: GCC 4.3.X libgomp Ralf Wildenhues
18:33 RE: GCC at Google Summer of Code'2009 Grigori Fursin
18:33 RE: GCC at Google Summer of Code'2009 Grigori Fursin
18:29 GCC 4.3.X libgomp Takis Psarogiannakopoulos
17:28 Re : constant propagation optimization charfi asma
17:24 Re: Minimum required GNAT version for bootstrap of GNAT on gcc trunk Laurent GUERBY
17:01 Re: New no-undefined-overflow branch Geert Bosch
16:33 Re: constant propagation optimization Nathan Froyd
14:50 Re: [RFC] Better debug info by substitution tracking for inliner (and other passes eliminating whole user variables) Andrew MacLeod
14:25 Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: Generic Data Flow Analyzer for GCC Richard Guenther
14:20 Re: Fwd: gcc-4.2-20090304 is now available H.J. Lu
14:19 Re: odd array subscript is above array bounds error Manuel López-Ibáñez
14:09 Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: Generic Data Flow Analyzer for GCC Seema Ravandale
13:57 Re: odd array subscript is above array bounds error Jack Howarth
13:56 Re: Fwd: gcc-4.2-20090304 is now available Richard Guenther
13:47 Re: Fwd: gcc-4.2-20090304 is now available Joseph S. Myers
13:42 Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: Generic Data Flow Analyzer for GCC Seema Ravandale
11:43 Re: [RFC] Better debug info by substitution tracking for inliner (and other passes eliminating whole user variables) Ralf Wildenhues
11:41 Re: [RFC] Better debug info by substitution tracking for inliner (and other passes eliminating whole user variables) Jan Hubicka
11:39 constant propagation optimization charfi asma
11:06 Re: [RFC] Better debug info by substitution tracking for inliner (and other passes eliminating whole user variables) Richard Guenther
11:04 Re: [RFC] Better debug info by substitution tracking for inliner (and other passes eliminating whole user variables) Richard Guenther
10:54 [RFC] Better debug info by substitution tracking for inliner (and other passes eliminating whole user variables) Jan Hubicka
09:55 Re: GCC at Google Summer of Code'2009 Yuanjie Huang
09:26 Re: Fwd: gcc-4.2-20090304 is now available Richard Guenther
09:05 Re: odd array subscript is above array bounds error Manuel López-Ibáñez
06:25 Re: GCC at Google Summer of Code'2009 lpeng
05:12 Re: odd array subscript is above array bounds error Dave Korn
04:21 Re: odd array subscript is above array bounds error Jack Howarth
03:47 Re: odd array subscript is above array bounds error Dave Korn
03:16 Academic Publication t . maroodamoothoo
03:00 odd array subscript is above array bounds error Jack Howarth
01:35 Re: Fwd: gcc-4.2-20090304 is now available Joseph S. Myers
01:16 Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: Generic Data Flow Analyzer for GCC Albert Cohen

March 04, 2009
23:45 Fwd: gcc-4.2-20090304 is now available H.J. Lu
22:42 gcc-4.2-20090304 is now available gccadmin
20:40 Re: Possible 4.4.0 regression (can't match template ctor of template class where...) Sebastian Redl
20:19 Re: Possible 4.4.0 regression (can't match template ctor of template class where...) Richard Guenther
20:13 Possible 4.4.0 regression (can't match template ctor of template class where...) Simon Hill
19:31 Regression in Java: all programs that link Java and C++ fail when optimized Andrew Haley
19:02 Re: mips64*-*-linux multi arch handling Adam Nemet
17:18 Re: mips64*-*-linux multi arch handling Laurent GUERBY
17:18 Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: Generic Data Flow Analyzer for GCC Emmanuel Fleury
16:35 Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: Generic Data Flow Analyzer for GCC Andrew Pinski
16:34 Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: Generic Data Flow Analyzer for GCC Manuel López-Ibáñez
16:33 Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: Generic Data Flow Analyzer for GCC Manuel López-Ibáñez
16:05 Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: Generic Data Flow Analyzer for GCC Tom Tromey
15:38 Re: C++ constant expressions in __attribute__ Joseph S. Myers
15:23 ANNOUNCEMENT: Generic Data Flow Analyzer for GCC seema
14:49 Re: GCC Compile Farm News: 12 architectures now available Dennis Clarke
14:42 Re: C++ constant expressions in __attribute__ Piotr Wyderski
14:23 Re: C++ constant expressions in __attribute__ H.J. Lu
14:15 C++ constant expressions in __attribute__ Piotr Wyderski
14:15 Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: Generic Data Flow Analyzer for GCC Manuel López-Ibáñez
13:53 Re: GCC Compile Farm News: 12 architectures now available Laurent GUERBY
13:47 Re: GCC Compile Farm News: 12 architectures now available Arnaud Charlet
13:04 Re: GCC Compile Farm News: 12 architectures now available Laurent GUERBY
12:24 Re: GCC Compile Farm News: 12 architectures now available Richard Guenther
12:17 GCC Compile Farm News: 12 architectures now available Laurent GUERBY
07:44 ANNOUNCEMENT: Generic Data Flow Analyzer for GCC Seema Ravandale
04:54 Re: define_peephol2 insn M R Swami Reddy
03:16 Re: load large immediate daniel tian

March 03, 2009
19:37 Re: Constant folding and Constant propagation Adam Nemet
15:47 Re: Why are these two functions compiled differently? Ian Lance Taylor
15:27 RE: Why are these two functions compiled differently? Bingfeng Mei
15:16 Re: Why are these two functions compiled differently? Richard Guenther
15:07 Why are these two functions compiled differently? Bingfeng Mei
14:36 Re: query automaton Vladimir Makarov
13:10 Re: Matrix multiplication: performance drop Joern Rennecke
12:54 Re: Matrix multiplication: performance drop Michael Meissner
12:45 Re: define_peephol2 insn Joern Rennecke
12:42 Matrix multiplication: performance drop Yury Serdyuk
12:15 define_peephol2 insn M R Swami Reddy
11:07 Re: Extracting Function Pointer Information?? Andrew Haley
09:30 Extracting Function Pointer Information?? Seema Ravandale
07:43 Re: Puzzle:where does gcc_cv_as come from? Ian Lance Taylor
07:27 Re: Split Stacks proposal Ian Lance Taylor
07:21 Puzzle:where does gcc_cv_as come from? Amker.Cheng
07:05 LLVM 2.5 Release Chris Lattner
05:30 Re: Split Stacks proposal Michael Veksler

March 02, 2009
21:26 Re: Split Stacks proposal Joe Buck
20:17 Re: Split Stacks proposal Mark Mitchell
20:07 Re: bug cloning gets dependencies wrong Manuel López-Ibáñez
17:19 bug cloning gets dependencies wrong Joern Rennecke
16:38 gcc install package sanity check Perry Smith
14:36 Re: ASM_SPECS on recent GCC 4.3.3 (4.X) Takis Psarogiannakopoulos
13:32 Re: ASM_SPECS on recent GCC 4.3.3 (4.X) Andrew Pinski
13:16 Re: ASM_SPECS on recent GCC 4.3.3 (4.X) Takis Psarogiannakopoulos
13:13 Re: ASM_SPECS on recent GCC 4.3.3 (4.X) Takis Psarogiannakopoulos
12:24 Re: ASM_SPECS on recent GCC 4.3.3 (4.X) Joseph S. Myers
09:50 Re: load large immediate daniel tian
08:47 Re: ASM_SPECS on recent GCC 4.3.3 (4.X) Takis Psarogiannakopoulos
01:43 Re: ASM_SPECS on recent GCC 4.3.3 (4.X) Ian Lance Taylor

March 01, 2009
23:06 Re: [Ada] Fix Windows merge glitch Eric Botcazou
22:49 Re: ASM_SPECS on recent GCC 4.3.3 (4.X) Takis Psarogiannakopoulos
22:26 Re: [Ada] Fix Windows merge glitch Ian Lance Taylor
21:50 PATCH: PR gas/9915: LOCAL_LABELS_DOLLAR doesn't work on Freebsd/x86 H.J. Lu
21:47 Re: [Ada] Fix Windows merge glitch Ben Elliston
20:32 Re: GNAT vs DW2/ZCX EH. Dave Korn
18:58 Re: ASM_SPECS on recent GCC 4.3.3 (4.X) Mark Mitchell
18:55 Re: ASM_SPECS on recent GCC 4.3.3 (4.X) Takis Psarogiannakopoulos
18:41 Re: ASM_SPECS on recent GCC 4.3.3 (4.X) Mark Mitchell
18:34 Re: avr.md: best practice to optimize bit manipulations? Georg-Johann Lay
18:29 SUBTARGET_SWITCES Takis Psarogiannakopoulos
18:12 avr.md: best practice to optimize bit manipulations? Georg-Johann Lay
16:07 ASM_SPECS on recent GCC 4.3.3 (4.X) Takis Psarogiannakopoulos
07:20 gcj -v --help: ecj switches Ralf Wildenhues
02:01 Re: Announce: MPFR 2.4.1 is released Vincent Lefevre

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:
Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.3