This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think)
Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>>> Not for PTA though ;)
>>> Care to expand?
>> PTA tracks points-to-NULL as pointing to "nothing".
>> This probably should be conditional on -fdelete-null-pointer-checks.
>> Otherwise *NULL and *anything won't alias.
>
> Yes, you're right. I'll see if I can construct a testcase and a patch.
>
> BTW, I was thinking of not doing the optimization anyway on volatile
> pointers. What do you think?
Indeed not. And with -fnon-call-exceptions we can recover from null
pointer traps; I don't know what would happen in this case.
Andrew.