This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Archive for SPEC CPU 2K/2006 results?


On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 7:56 PM, H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 10:45 AM, Richard Guenther
> <richard.guenther@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 7:34 PM, H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> We have been running functional tests on SPEC CPU 2K/2006
>>> on Linux/ia32 and Linux/Intel64 at -O2 and -O3. We'd like to
>>> report pass and regressions.  We may send SPEC CPU
>>> regressions to
>>>
>>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-regression/
>>>
>>> But for passes, there is no suitable place to report.
>>>
>>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/
>>>
>>> is for gcc testsuite. If I send SPEC CPU pass to it, it
>>> may be buried by normal test results.
>>>
>>> Any suggestions.
>>
>> Put it on a website and link to it from
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/benchmarks/
>>
>
> My website isn't visible to public. Also it isn't really benchmark since
> I only run functional tests. My reports only show pass or which tests
> failed.

I see.  I agree that gcc-regression is appropriate for FAILs then.  Is it
important to have PASSes available somewhere? (you can assume PASSes
if there are no FAIL reports).

Richard.

>
> --
> H.J.
>


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]