This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: remaining new darwin regressions

From: Mike Stump <mrs at apple dot com>
To: Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo dot med dot uc dot edu>
Cc: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com>, GCC <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Eric Christopher <echristo at apple dot com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 13:53:45 -0800
Subject: Re: remaining new darwin regressions
References: <49777A37.9020102@gmail.com> <842E5E8C-DB83-4FFF-8B3A-E20B007FE6AB@apple.com> <20090121204352.GA31846@bromo.med.uc.edu>

On Jan 21, 2009, at 3:43 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:

So that invalidates your previously proposed patch? Or should I still test it?

No need to test, I was wrong about that being the bit that causes it. The description I last posted should be about right however, one just needs a bit of time in the debugger to find it (and the thing that controls it).

References:
- Re: remaining new darwin regressions
  - From: Uros Bizjak
- Re: remaining new darwin regressions
  - From: Mike Stump
- Re: remaining new darwin regressions
  - From: Jack Howarth

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]