Re: This is a Cygwin failure yeah?

["Andy Scott" <kirkshorts at googlemail dot com>]

On 07/01/2009, Dave Korn <dave.korn.cygwin@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Andy Scott wrote:
>  > GCC Build One:
>  >
>  > Again stage3 part of build, and this is what actually stops the build
>  > the above issue doesn't seem to (I think it happens in stage 2),
>
>
>   That sentence contradicts itself and what you said earlier, doesn't it?
>
If it does it wasn't supposed to :-) As far as I can tell the stack
overflow happens in stage2 - the actual error that stops the build is
in stage 3. Now it is possible that the stack overflow issue causes a
subtle error in code generation that i snot picked up until stage 3
and the failure I cite later on.

re:strsignal - ah right I will take a look and see at that all then.

Bernd>thanks for the information regarding stack issues on Cygwin.
Will look at them also.

<snip>

Andy
-- 
Brain upgrade required: a working hypothalamus