gcc archive
date index for January, 2009

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

January 31, 2009
22:49 Re: GCC Plug-in Framework ready to port Taras Glek
20:13 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-01-31) John David Anglin
19:02 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-01-31) Dave Korn
18:48 Re: Creating imaginary inf/nan in GCC Kaveh R. Ghazi
18:21 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-01-31) Dave Korn
18:09 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-01-31) Richard Guenther
18:09 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-01-31) Richard Guenther
17:58 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-01-31) John David Anglin
17:48 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-01-31) Dave Korn
17:36 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-01-31) H.J. Lu
13:41 RE: GCC Plug-in Framework ready to port Grigori Fursin
13:28 Re: GCC Plug-in Framework ready to port Diego Novillo
13:24 Re: GCC Plug-in Framework ready to port Richard Guenther
13:11 Re: GCC Plug-in Framework ready to port Diego Novillo
12:41 Re: MIPS64 -msym32 and DWARF2_ADDR_SIZE Richard Sandiford
12:30 GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-01-31) Jakub Jelinek
10:15 Re: Creating imaginary inf/nan in GCC Richard Guenther
10:14 Re: GCC Plug-in Framework ready to port Richard Guenther
06:13 -L<path> on AIX Perry Smith
04:27 Re: Creating imaginary inf/nan in GCC Kaveh R. Ghazi
04:02 GCC Plug-in Framework ready to port Sean Callanan
03:17 MIPS64 -msym32 and DWARF2_ADDR_SIZE Adam Nemet
00:17 Re: New GCC Runtime Library Exception Mark Mitchell

January 30, 2009
23:44 Re: New GCC Runtime Library Exception Gerald Pfeifer
22:48 gcc-4.4-20090130 is now available gccadmin
22:33 Re: GCC & OpenCL ? Tobias Burnus
21:56 Re: GCC & OpenCL ? Michael Meissner
20:51 Re: GCC Runtime Library Exception Ian Lance Taylor
19:38 Re: GCC Runtime Library Exception Sebastian Redl
19:14 GCC Runtime Library Exception Ian Lance Taylor
18:18 Re: New GCC Runtime Library Exception: not fit for purpose Joern Rennecke
17:54 Re: New GCC Runtime Library Exception: not fit for purpose Joe Buck
16:36 Re: [strict-aliasing] incorrect warning with g++-current in STL Paolo Carlini
16:17 [strict-aliasing] incorrect warning with g++-current in STL Дмитрий Дьяченко
14:11 GCC & OpenCL ? Basile STARYNKEVITCH
12:44 Solve transitive closure issue in modulo scheduling Bingfeng Mei
12:15 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think) ZoltÃn KÃcsi
11:36 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think) Robert Dewar
11:35 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think) Robert Dewar
10:53 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think) Andy Armstrong
05:11 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think) Ross Smith
01:43 TARGET_NARROW_VOLATILE_BITFIELD DJ Delorie
01:27 Re: New GCC Runtime Library Exception: not fit for purpose Joern Rennecke

January 29, 2009
23:45 Re: Request for testing/help for the LTO branch Chris Lattner
23:42 RE: Binary Autovectorization Rodrigo Dominguez
22:45 gcc-4.3-20090129 is now available gccadmin
22:39 Re: New GCC Runtime Library Exception: not fit for purpose Ian Lance Taylor
22:04 Re: Binary Autovectorization Nathan Froyd
21:53 Re: Binary Autovectorization Tim Prince
21:47 Binary Autovectorization Rodrigo Dominguez
20:11 Re: New GCC Runtime Library Exception: not fit for purpose Joern Rennecke
19:56 Re: New GCC Runtime Library Exception: not fit for purpose Ian Lance Taylor
19:39 Re: New GCC Runtime Library Exception: not fit for purpose Joern Rennecke
19:25 Re: Request for testing/help for the LTO branch Rafael Espindola
19:13 Re: New GCC Runtime Library Exception: not fit for purpose Ian Lance Taylor
19:09 Re: RFC: case insensitive for #include Chris Lattner
18:22 Re: New GCC Runtime Library Exception: not fit for purpose Joern Rennecke
18:02 Re: New GCC Runtime Library Exception Chris Lattner
17:42 Re: New GCC Runtime Library Exception: not fit for purpose Joern Rennecke
17:39 Re: New GCC Runtime Library Exception: not fit for purpose Ian Lance Taylor
17:13 Re: New GCC Runtime Library Exception: not fit for purpose Manuel López-Ibáñez
17:03 Re: Creating imaginary inf/nan in GCC Tobias Burnus
16:27 Re: Creating imaginary inf/nan in GCC Joseph S. Myers
16:16 Re: sizeof in initializer expression not working as expected Paolo Bonzini
16:15 Re: New GCC Runtime Library Exception: not fit for purpose Joern Rennecke
16:03 Re: New GCC Runtime Library Exception Ian Lance Taylor
16:03 Re: New GCC Runtime Library Exception: not fit for purpose Joern Rennecke
16:01 Creating imaginary inf/nan in GCC Kaveh R. GHAZI
15:55 Re: New GCC Runtime Library Exception Florian Weimer
15:47 Re: New GCC Runtime Library Exception Ian Lance Taylor
15:46 Re: New GCC Runtime Library Exception: not fit for purpose Paolo Bonzini
15:43 Re: We should backport gcc 4.4 regression testcases to gcc 4.3 branch H.J. Lu
15:38 Re: New GCC Runtime Library Exception Joern Rennecke
15:37 Re: New GCC Runtime Library Exception: not fit for purpose Ian Lance Taylor
15:30 Re: New GCC Runtime Library Exception: not fit for purpose Ian Lance Taylor
15:20 Re: New GCC Runtime Library Exception: not fit for purpose Joern Rennecke
15:12 Re: gcc-4.3.3 bootstrap fails on old Sun Sparc Rainer Orth
15:11 Re: New GCC Runtime Library Exception: not fit for purpose Joern Rennecke
15:08 Re: New GCC Runtime Library Exception: not fit for purpose Ian Lance Taylor
15:04 Re: New GCC Runtime Library Exception Ian Lance Taylor
15:01 Re: New GCC Runtime Library Exception: not fit for purpose amylaar
14:55 Re: New GCC Runtime Library Exception: not fit for purpose Ian Lance Taylor
14:38 Re: New GCC Runtime Library Exception: not fit for purpose Joern Rennecke
13:57 Re: New GCC Runtime Library Exception Joern Rennecke
13:33 Re: New GCC Runtime Library Exception: not fit for purpose Manuel López-Ibáñez
12:43 Problems with DWARF debug info and GCC 4.3.2 Sebastian Huber
12:34 Re: New GCC Runtime Library Exception: not fit for purpose Joern Rennecke
12:21 Re: New GCC Runtime Library Exception Florian Weimer
11:30 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think) ZoltÃn KÃcsi
11:15 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think) Vincent Lefevre
11:06 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think) Vincent Lefevre
08:53 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think) Andrew Haley
06:32 Re: Void Pointer Alignment - GCC 3.4.6 Rohit Arul Raj
06:10 Re: Void Pointer Alignment - GCC 3.4.6 Ian Lance Taylor
05:59 Void Pointer Alignment - GCC 3.4.6 Rohit Arul Raj
05:54 sizeof in initializer expression not working as expected Bruce Korb
04:41 gcc 4.4.0 loop-unrolling optimizations peculiarity observed martin krastev
04:05 Re: New GCC Runtime Library Exception Joe Buck
04:00 Re: CGEN-generated files vs GPL Joe Buck

January 28, 2009
23:03 Re: New GCC Runtime Library Exception Mark Mitchell
22:45 Re: New GCC Runtime Library Exception Joseph S. Myers
22:42 gcc-4.2-20090128 is now available gccadmin
22:35 Re: incorrect license on some gcc/*.c files? Richard Guenther
22:30 incorrect license on some gcc/*.c files? Ben Elliston
22:27 Re: CGEN-generated files vs GPL Joseph S. Myers
22:18 Re: CGEN-generated files vs GPL DJ Delorie
22:17 Re: New GCC Runtime Library Exception Mark Mitchell
22:09 Re: Request for testing/help for the LTO branch H.J. Lu
22:08 Re: New GCC Runtime Library Exception Joseph S. Myers
22:05 Re: CGEN-generated files vs GPL Joseph S. Myers
22:04 Re: CGEN-generated files vs GPL Frank Ch. Eigler
21:42 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think) Erik Trulsson
21:34 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think) Robert Dewar
21:33 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think) Robert Dewar
21:26 Re: New GCC Runtime Library Exception: amendment proposal Robert Dewar
21:00 Re: RFC: case insensitive for #include Ian Lance Taylor
20:52 Re: RFC: case insensitive for #include H.J. Lu
20:49 Re: RFC: case insensitive for #include Ian Lance Taylor
20:44 Re: RFC: case insensitive for #include H.J. Lu
20:36 CGEN-generated files vs GPL DJ Delorie
20:36 Re: RFC: case insensitive for #include David Daney
20:32 Re: RFC: case insensitive for #include Ian Lance Taylor
20:24 Re: RFC: case insensitive for #include H.J. Lu
20:21 Re: RFC: case insensitive for #include Chris Lattner
20:15 Re: RFC: case insensitive for #include H.J. Lu
20:04 Re: RFC: case insensitive for #include David Daney
19:51 RFC: case insensitive for #include H.J. Lu
19:24 Re: New GCC Runtime Library Exception Mark Mitchell
17:36 Re: New GCC Runtime Library Exception: not fit for purpose Ian Lance Taylor
17:22 Re: Request for testing/help for the LTO branch Eric Botcazou
17:12 Re: Request for testing/help for the LTO branch Rainer Orth
17:10 Re: Request for testing/help for the LTO branch Joe Buck
17:08 Re: Request for testing/help for the LTO branch Joe Buck
17:07 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think) PaweÅ Sikora
16:40 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think) Andrew Haley
16:29 Re: gcc-4.3.3 bootstrap fails on old Sun Sparc Dennis Clarke
16:13 PPS: New GCC Runtime Library Exception: amendment proposal Joern Rennecke
15:09 PS: New GCC Runtime Library Exception: amendment proposal Joern Rennecke
15:01 New GCC Runtime Library Exception: amendment proposal Joern Rennecke
14:48 Re: cross-compilation, deprecated option and libgcc Vincent R.
14:31 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think) Andreas Schwab
14:21 Re: x86-64 and large code model questions/bugs H.J. Lu
14:21 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think) ZoltÃn KÃcsi
14:01 New GCC Runtime Library Exception: not fit for purpose Joern Rennecke
13:41 Re: Request for testing/help for the LTO branch Rainer Orth
13:40 Re: Request for testing/help for the LTO branch Diego Novillo
13:36 Re: Request for testing/help for the LTO branch Rainer Orth
13:34 Re: Request for testing/help for the LTO branch Diego Novillo
13:18 Re: Request for testing/help for the LTO branch Joseph S. Myers
13:18 Re: Request for testing/help for the LTO branch Rainer Orth
13:15 Re: Request for testing/help for the LTO branch Diego Novillo
13:12 Re: Request for testing/help for the LTO branch Rainer Orth
13:00 c-4_5-branch merge plan Joseph S. Myers
13:00 Re: Request for testing/help for the LTO branch Diego Novillo
12:59 Re: Request for testing/help for the LTO branch Diego Novillo
12:55 Re: Request for testing/help for the LTO branch Diego Novillo
12:13 Re: Request for testing/help for the LTO branch Rafael Espindola
12:05 Re: Request for testing/help for the LTO branch Rainer Orth
12:00 Re: Request for testing/help for the LTO branch Rafael Espindola
11:59 Re: gcc-4.3.3 bootstrap fails on old Sun Sparc Rainer Orth
11:56 Re: Request for testing/help for the LTO branch Rainer Orth
11:53 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think) Robert Dewar
11:50 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think) Andrew Haley
11:24 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think) ZoltÃn KÃcsi
10:36 Re: Request for testing/help for the LTO branch Richard Guenther
10:30 Re: New GCC Runtime Library Exception Gerald Pfeifer
10:19 -ftime-report might wrap Unruh, Erwin
09:24 Re: x86-64 and large code model questions/bugs Andi Kleen
09:21 Re: x86-64 and large code model questions/bugs Paolo Bonzini
09:08 Re: gcc-4.3.3 bootstrap fails on old Sun Sparc Andreas Schwab
08:55 Re: x86-64 and large code model questions/bugs Andi Kleen
08:44 Re: Request for testing/help for the LTO branch Rafael Espindola
08:41 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think) Robert Dewar
08:39 Re: x86-64 and large code model questions/bugs Paolo Bonzini
07:06 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think) Chris Lattner
06:48 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think) Ian Lance Taylor
05:06 Re: Request for testing/help for the LTO branch Chris Lattner
05:00 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think) Chris Lattner
02:40 Re: gcc-4.3.3 bootstrap fails on old Sun Sparc Dennis Clarke
01:58 Re: gcc-4.3.3 bootstrap fails on old Sun Sparc Joe Buck
01:50 Re: New GCC Runtime Library Exception Adam Nemet
01:46 Re: New GCC Runtime Library Exception Gerald Pfeifer
01:29 Re: gcc-4.3.3 bootstrap fails on old Sun Sparc Dennis Clarke
01:14 Re: gcc-4.3.3 bootstrap fails on old Sun Sparc Joe Buck
01:11 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think) Ian Lance Taylor
00:58 gcc-4.3.3 bootstrap fails on old Sun Sparc Dennis Clarke
00:50 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think) Chris Lattner
00:44 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think) Joe Buck
00:29 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think) Robert Dewar

January 27, 2009
22:52 Re: New GCC Runtime Library Exception Joseph S. Myers
22:16 Re: New GCC Runtime Library Exception Joe Buck
22:12 Re: Request for testing/help for the LTO branch Diego Novillo
22:06 Re: Request for testing/help for the LTO branch H.J. Lu
22:02 Re: Request for testing/help for the LTO branch Diego Novillo
21:58 Re: Request for testing/help for the LTO branch H.J. Lu
21:54 Re: RFD: simple instruction cache code layout heuristics David Miller
21:32 Re: Request for testing/help for the LTO branch Diego Novillo
21:24 Re: Request for testing/help for the LTO branch H.J. Lu
21:18 Re: New GCC Runtime Library Exception Ian Lance Taylor
21:16 Re: RFD: simple instruction cache code layout heuristics Ian Lance Taylor
21:13 Request for testing/help for the LTO branch Diego Novillo
21:12 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think) Ian Lance Taylor
21:11 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think) Ian Lance Taylor
21:09 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think) Ian Lance Taylor
20:51 Re: New GCC Runtime Library Exception Florian Weimer
20:46 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think) Laurent GUERBY
20:38 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think) Florian Weimer
19:48 [lto] Merged trunk@143693 into branch Diego Novillo
18:45 New GCC Runtime Library Exception David Edelsohn
18:07 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think) Joe Buck
18:06 Re: x86-64 and large code model questions/bugs Andi Kleen
17:47 Re: x86-64 and large code model questions/bugs H.J. Lu
17:44 Re: x86-64 and large code model questions/bugs Steve Ellcey
17:40 Re: x86-64 and large code model questions/bugs H.J. Lu
17:34 Re: x86-64 and large code model questions/bugs Steve Ellcey
15:41 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think) Andrew Haley
15:01 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think) Robert Dewar
14:58 Re: RFD: simple instruction cache code layout heuristics H.J. Lu
14:53 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think) Vincent Lefevre
14:41 RFD: simple instruction cache code layout heuristics Joern Rennecke
14:08 Re: gcc-4.3.3.tar.bz2 md5sum does not match Ian Lance Taylor
14:03 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think) Sebastian Redl
13:53 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think) Laurent GUERBY
13:42 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think) Daniel Jacobowitz
13:14 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think) Paolo Bonzini
12:33 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think) Paolo Bonzini
12:09 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think) Robert Dewar
11:31 Re: x86-64 and large code model questions/bugs Andi Kleen
11:07 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think) Paolo Bonzini
10:45 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think) Andrew Haley
10:41 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think) Richard Guenther
10:36 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think) Paolo Bonzini
10:33 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think) Richard Guenther
10:29 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think) Paolo Bonzini
10:07 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think) Richard Guenther
09:53 Re: gcc-4.3.3.tar.bz2 md5sum does not match Richard Guenther
08:33 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think) Paolo Bonzini
08:33 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think) Kaveh R. GHAZI
08:12 Re: Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think) James Dennett
07:52 Serious code generation/optimisation bug (I think) zoltan

January 26, 2009
22:37 Re: Archive for SPEC CPU 2K/2006 results? H.J. Lu
22:32 Re: GCC RES: Restrictive Exception Specification: 0.1 - Alpha. Feedback Request. Ben Elliston
22:28 x86-64 and large code model questions/bugs Steve Ellcey
22:16 Re: cross-compilation, deprecated option and libgcc Ben Elliston
19:45 Re: Archive for SPEC CPU 2K/2006 results? H.J. Lu
19:32 Re: Archive for SPEC CPU 2K/2006 results? Ian Lance Taylor
18:54 Re: gcc-4.3.3.tar.bz2 md5sum does not match Ian Lance Taylor
18:17 Re: C++0X constexpr implementation status Jason Merrill
18:09 Re: C++0x Concepts development schedule Jason Merrill
17:08 Announce: MPFR 2.4.0 is release Vincent Lefevre
16:49 Re: gcc-4.3.3.tar.bz2 md5sum does not match Richard Guenther
16:45 Re: Inline limits Richard Guenther
16:42 Re: Inline limits Richard Guenther
16:38 Re: gcc-4.3.3.tar.bz2 md5sum does not match H.J. Lu
16:29 Inline limits Hariharan
15:53 Re: gcc-4.3.3.tar.bz2 md5sum does not match Richard Guenther
15:23 gcc-4.3.3.tar.bz2 md5sum does not match Andrew Walrond
13:20 cross-compilation, deprecated option and libgcc Vincent R.
08:18 Re: This is a Cygwin failure yeah? Andy Scott
00:09 Re: Definitely not IRA [was Re: Probably not IRA [was Re: IRA vs. frame pointer elimination [PR38952]]] Dave Korn

January 25, 2009
20:01 PATCH for Re: New mirror Gerald Pfeifer
19:18 Re: Archive for SPEC CPU 2K/2006 results? H.J. Lu
19:04 Re: Archive for SPEC CPU 2K/2006 results? Richard Guenther
18:56 Re: Archive for SPEC CPU 2K/2006 results? H.J. Lu
18:45 Re: Archive for SPEC CPU 2K/2006 results? Richard Guenther
18:34 Archive for SPEC CPU 2K/2006 results? H.J. Lu

January 24, 2009
22:05 Re: register int variable being written to/read from stack John Regehr
14:04 GCC 4.3.4 Status Update Richard Guenther
06:31 Definitely not IRA [was Re: Probably not IRA [was Re: IRA vs. frame pointer elimination [PR38952]]] Dave Korn
06:21 Probably not IRA [was Re: IRA vs. frame pointer elimination [PR38952]] Dave Korn
05:47 Re: IRA vs. frame pointer elimination [PR38952] Dave Korn
02:38 GCC RES: Restrictive Exception Specification: 0.1 - Alpha. Feedback Request. Simon Hill
01:48 Re: IRA vs. frame pointer elimination [PR38952] Dave Korn
01:40 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-01-06) Dave Korn
01:39 Re: IRA vs. frame pointer elimination [PR38952] H.J. Lu
01:29 IRA vs. frame pointer elimination [PR38952] Dave Korn

January 23, 2009
22:48 gcc-4.4-20090123 is now available gccadmin
15:56 Re: RFC: Idea for code size reduction Philipp Marek

January 22, 2009
23:32 [graphite] Polyhedral Compilation Package Interface Specification Jan Sjodin
22:48 gcc-4.3-20090122 is now available gccadmin
22:21 Re: Document error on TARGET_ASM_NAMED_SECTION ? Ian Lance Taylor
17:22 Document error on TARGET_ASM_NAMED_SECTION ? Bingfeng Mei
15:10 Re: Size of the GCC repository Robert Dewar
15:05 Re: Size of the GCC repository Gerald Pfeifer
13:00 Re: GCC 4.3.3 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org Richard Guenther
12:13 Re: GCC 4.3.3 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org Matthias Klose
11:51 Re: DWARF register numbering discrepancy on SPARC between GCC and GDB Eric Botcazou
11:12 Re: Antwort: Re: Size of the GCC repository Paolo Carlini
10:48 Antwort: Re: Size of the GCC repository Markus Milleder
10:10 Re: Size of the GCC repository Andreas Schwab
10:06 Re: Size of the GCC repository Paolo Carlini
09:52 Re: Size of the GCC repository Paolo Carlini
08:46 Re: ARM interworking question ZoltÃn KÃcsi
03:14 He's short but with such an instrument. handy eotrain
01:33 Re: Size of the GCC repository Daniel Berlin
01:13 Size of the GCC repository Paolo Carlini

January 21, 2009
22:53 Re: [target.md]: Backend passes cause code bloat of +140%. Georg-Johann Lay
22:44 gcc-4.2-20090121 is now available gccadmin
21:53 Re: remaining new darwin regressions Mike Stump
21:21 Re: [target.md]: Backend passes cause code bloat of +140%. Georg-Johann Lay
21:13 cross-compilation and crt issues Vincent R.
21:10 Re: [target.md]: Backend passes cause code bloat of +140%. Georg-Johann Lay
20:44 Re: This is a Cygwin failure yeah? Andy Scott
20:43 Re: remaining new darwin regressions Jack Howarth
20:14 Re: DWARF register numbering discrepancy on SPARC between GCC and GDB David Miller
19:59 Re: remaining new darwin regressions Mike Stump
19:56 Re: C integrated RPC andrew babanin
19:49 Re: remaining new darwin regressions Eric Christopher
19:41 Re: remaining new darwin regressions Uros Bizjak
19:32 Re: C integrated RPC Joel Sherrill
19:25 Re: C integrated RPC andrew babanin
18:47 Re: C integrated RPC Joel Sherrill
18:44 Re: remaining new darwin regressions Mike Stump
18:40 Re: C integrated RPC andrew babanin
17:21 RE: [target.md]: Backend passes cause code bloat of +140%. Weddington, Eric
17:07 Re: [target.md]: Backend passes cause code bloat of +140%. Joseph S. Myers
17:04 [target.md]: Backend passes cause code bloat of +140%. Georg-Johann Lay
15:28 Re: C integrated RPC Ian Lance Taylor
14:22 Re: DWARF register numbering discrepancy on SPARC between GCC and GDB Eric Botcazou
12:37 Re: DWARF register numbering discrepancy on SPARC between GCC and GDB Mark Kettenis
12:02 GCC Profile base optimizations using simulator profile Hariharan
12:00 Re: DWARF register numbering discrepancy on SPARC between GCC and GDB Rainer Orth
11:09 DWARF register numbering discrepancy on SPARC between GCC and GDB Joel Brobecker
09:49 Re: ARM interworking question Richard Earnshaw
09:42 Re: ARM interworking question Andrew Haley
08:48 ARM interworking question ZoltÃn KÃcsi
08:08 Re: C integrated RPC andrew babanin
07:24 Re: register int variable being written to/read from stack Ian Lance Taylor
02:47 Re: remaining new darwin regressions H.J. Lu
02:22 Re: remaining new darwin regressions Jack Howarth
02:12 register int variable being written to/read from stack baver
01:50 Re: remaining new darwin regressions H.J. Lu
01:37 Re: C integrated RPC Ian Lance Taylor

January 20, 2009
23:29 remaining new darwin regressions Jack Howarth
22:03 Re: Use longlong.h? Joseph S. Myers
19:33 C integrated RPC andrew babanin
18:55 Re: Use longlong.h? Mark Mitchell
18:51 Re: gfortran manual : error in function range documentation ? Tobias Burnus
18:23 gfortran manual : error in function range documentation ? Jacques Lefrere
15:32 [4.5] Alias-Improvements branch overview and merge proposal Richard Guenther
15:02 Re: -fgraphite docs Sebastian Pop
13:37 What's the difference between (*(x)).a and (x)->a holderlin
13:27 Re: A question about SRA and out-of-bounds array accesses Richard Guenther
13:17 Re: A question about SRA and out-of-bounds array accesses Paolo Bonzini
12:45 Re: A question about SRA and out-of-bounds array accesses Richard Guenther
11:06 A question about SRA and out-of-bounds array accesses Martin Jambor
08:27 Re: GCC 4.3.3 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org Richard Guenther
05:27 Re: -fgraphite docs Ben Elliston
05:20 Re: -fgraphite docs Sebastian Pop
05:11 Re: -fgraphite docs Ben Elliston
05:09 Re: -fgraphite docs Sebastian Pop
04:46 -fgraphite docs Ben Elliston

January 19, 2009
19:33 Re: GCC 4.3.3 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org H.J. Lu
18:46 Re: We should backport gcc 4.4 regression testcases to gcc 4.3 branch Mark Mitchell
18:39 Re: Use longlong.h? Mark Mitchell
16:22 Re: arm-elf-ld: undefined reference to 'xxx' Alexandre Pereira Nunes
14:02 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-01-06) Joel Sherrill
12:52 arm-elf-ld: undefined reference to 'xxx' Prez Ahn
11:24 Re: Cygwin support Steinar Bang
09:27 Re: GCC 4.3.3 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org Richard Guenther
01:16 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-01-06) Dave Korn

January 18, 2009
22:06 Re: This is a Cygwin failure yeah? Dave Korn
21:57 Re: GCC 4.3.3 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org H.J. Lu
21:54 Re: We should backport gcc 4.4 regression testcases to gcc 4.3 branch H.J. Lu
21:51 Re: We should backport gcc 4.4 regression testcases to gcc 4.3 branch Richard Guenther
21:47 Re: GCC 4.3.3 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org Richard Guenther
21:35 We should backport gcc 4.4 regression testcases to gcc 4.3 branch H.J. Lu
17:09 Re: GCC 4.3.3 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org H.J. Lu
15:38 Re: GCC 4.3.3 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org H.J. Lu
12:13 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-01-06) Richard Guenther
01:53 Re: putting operands in MEM even with register_operand predicate Ian Lance Taylor
01:41 putting operands in MEM even with register_operand predicate Sean D'Epagnier
01:04 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-01-06) Dave Korn

January 17, 2009
20:30 Re: GCC 4.3.3 Status Report (2009-01-17), branch frozen for John David Anglin
19:56 Re: GCC 4.3.3 Status Report (2009-01-17), branch frozen for release Richard Guenther
18:29 Re: GCC 4.3.3 Status Report (2009-01-17), branch frozen for release John David Anglin
16:27 Re: Extremewebsitetraffic.com payments
15:29 Re: Useless option parsing code in genautomata.c ? ccg ijsj
15:08 Traffic/Hits Information ExtremeWebsiteTraffic . com
14:56 Download link for 200 Master Resell Rights Products Cody Moya
14:39 Activate your Email Subscription to: AdBrite Blog confirmations
14:23 GCC 4.3.3 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org Richard Guenther
10:37 Validate Your Email Address ExtremeWebsiteTraffic . com
10:37 Affiliate Account Information ExtremeWebsiteTraffic . com
10:34 Traffic/Hits Information ExtremeWebsiteTraffic . com
10:32 I'm Telling a Friend - YOU!... ExtremeWebsiteTraffic . com
09:45 Re: GCC 4.3.3 Status Report (2009-01-17), branch frozen for release Paul Richard Thomas
09:15 New mirror igor
08:33 Re: GCC 4.3.3 Status Report (2009-01-17), branch frozen for release Paul Richard Thomas
00:34 Re: prologue length Ian Lance Taylor

January 16, 2009
23:12 Re: GCC 4.3.3 Status Report (2009-01-17), branch frozen for release Richard Guenther
23:08 Re: GCC 4.3.3 Status Report (2009-01-17), branch frozen for release H.J. Lu
23:03 GCC 4.3.3 Status Report (2009-01-17), branch frozen for release Richard Guenther
22:44 gcc-4.4-20090116 is now available gccadmin
22:42 Re: prologue length Vincent R.
22:14 Re: prologue length Ian Lance Taylor
21:48 Re: How to implement "unsigned long long __rdtsc ()" for x86? H.J. Lu
21:28 Re: How to implement "unsigned long long __rdtsc ()" for x86? H.J. Lu
21:23 Re: prologue length Vincent R.
20:48 Re: How to implement "unsigned long long __rdtsc ()" for x86? Andrew Pinski
19:34 Re: How to implement "unsigned long long __rdtsc ()" for x86? Jack Lloyd
17:36 Re: How to implement "unsigned long long __rdtsc ()" for x86? Andrew Thomas Pinski
17:24 How to implement "unsigned long long __rdtsc ()" for x86? H.J. Lu
16:38 Re: prologue length Ian Lance Taylor
16:30 prologue length Vincent R.
15:57 Re: Missed bitfield packing? Richard Guenther
15:20 Re: Missed bitfield packing? Ian Lance Taylor
15:13 C extension to catch function return type Tommaso Cucinotta
06:21 Re: Libiberty issue vs cygwin [was Re: This is a Cygwin failure yeah?] DJ Delorie
04:27 Libiberty issue vs cygwin [was Re: This is a Cygwin failure yeah?] Dave Korn

January 15, 2009
23:57 Missed bitfield packing? Adam Nemet
23:48 Re: Useless option parsing code in genautomata.c ? Ben Elliston
22:49 gcc-4.3-20090115 is now available gccadmin
21:24 Re: Graphite/Cloog/PPL problems on Cygwin, HEAD broken maybe? Dave Korn
21:08 Re: missing gcc/testsuite/objc/execute/trivial.m? IainS
20:58 Re: missing gcc/testsuite/objc/execute/trivial.m? Andrew Pinski
20:52 Re: missing gcc/testsuite/objc/execute/trivial.m? IainS
20:41 Re: missing gcc/testsuite/objc/execute/trivial.m? Andrew Pinski
20:14 missing gcc/testsuite/objc/execute/trivial.m? IainS
15:07 Re: gcc binary download Tim Prince
09:52 Useless option parsing code in genautomata.c ? ccg ijsj
09:26 Re: correct place for code. Andreas Schwab
09:17 Re: gcc binary download Tobias Burnus
08:38 Re: correct place for code. IainS
01:45 Re: correct place for code. Ian Lance Taylor

January 14, 2009
23:48 Re: GCC 4.4 SNAPSHOT - BUILD ERROR Ben Elliston
23:20 GCC 4.4 SNAPSHOT - BUILD ERROR Guilherme Renato
22:40 gcc-4.2-20090114 is now available gccadmin
22:24 Re: gcc binary download Ben Elliston
22:22 Re: Installing GCC:Configuration (GCC-4.3.2) Ben Elliston
21:14 gcc binary download Simon Tsai
16:36 correct place for code. IainS
13:13 Re: This is a Cygwin failure yeah? Dave Korn
08:51 Re: This is a Cygwin failure yeah? Andy Scott

January 13, 2009
22:04 50.000 GB zene, jÃtÃk Ãs DVD filmek! NyitÃsi AKCIÃ!
21:50 Installing GCC:Configuration (GCC-4.3.2) Franklyn Simon
09:24 Re: Help understanding gcc alias analysis Richard Guenther

January 12, 2009
21:58 Re: Steve Kargle and Daniel Franke - reviewers. Steve Kargl
21:51 Re: Help understanding gcc alias analysis Raoul Gough
20:33 Re: [PPL-devel] Graphite/Cloog/PPL problems on Cygwin, HEAD broken maybe? Roberto Bagnara
19:49 Re: [PPL-devel] Graphite/Cloog/PPL problems on Cygwin, HEAD broken maybe? David Edelsohn
19:26 Re: [PPL-devel] Graphite/Cloog/PPL problems on Cygwin, HEAD broken maybe? Dave Korn
19:24 Re: Graphite/Cloog/PPL problems on Cygwin, HEAD broken maybe? Dave Korn
17:57 Re: [PPL-devel] Graphite/Cloog/PPL problems on Cygwin, HEAD broken maybe? Joseph S. Myers
17:36 Re: [PPL-devel] Graphite/Cloog/PPL problems on Cygwin, HEAD broken maybe? Roberto Bagnara
17:36 Re: marking ppc440 tests as unsupported Joel Sherrill
17:03 Re: Graphite/Cloog/PPL problems on Cygwin, HEAD broken maybe? Sebastian Pop
16:23 Re: marking ppc440 tests as unsupported Joseph S. Myers
16:18 Re: marking ppc440 tests as unsupported Daniel Jacobowitz
16:11 marking ppc440 tests as unsupported Joel Sherrill
15:53 Graphite/Cloog/PPL problems on Cygwin, HEAD broken maybe? Dave Korn
15:37 RE: Feature request concerning opcodes in the function prolog amylaar
14:32 Re: Feature request concerning opcodes in the function prolog Paolo Bonzini
14:29 RE: Feature request concerning opcodes in the function prolog Stefan Dösinger
13:10 Re: Feature request concerning opcodes in the function prolog Paolo Bonzini
12:40 RE: Feature request concerning opcodes in the function prolog Stefan Dösinger
09:16 Re: Help understanding gcc alias analysis Richard Guenther

January 11, 2009
23:04 Re: Help understanding gcc alias analysis Raoul Gough
19:08 Re: Help understanding gcc alias analysis Richard Guenther
18:59 Re: Help understanding gcc alias analysis Raoul Gough
12:29 Re: Steve Kargle and Daniel Franke - reviewers. Daniel Franke
09:36 Re: Xtensa port maintainer Gerald Pfeifer

January 10, 2009
18:07 Steve Kargle and Daniel Franke - reviewers. Toon Moene
15:13 Re: -frtl-abstract-sequences broken? Laurent GUERBY
14:57 Re: -frtl-abstract-sequences broken? Richard Guenther
14:34 -frtl-abstract-sequences broken? Laurent GUERBY
12:31 Re: This is a Cygwin failure yeah? Bernd Roesch
11:59 Re: Help understanding gcc alias analysis Richard Guenther
11:56 Re: Help understanding gcc alias analysis Richard Guenther
11:20 Help understanding gcc alias analysis Raoul Gough
10:01 Re: having trouble with define_split Denis Chertykov

January 09, 2009
22:44 gcc-4.4-20090109 is now available gccadmin
19:44 Re: This is a Cygwin failure yeah? Dave Korn
16:05 Re: Options of fixing biggest alignment in PR target/38736 Richard Guenther
15:59 Re: Options of fixing biggest alignment in PR target/38736 Ian Lance Taylor
15:57 Re: Options of fixing biggest alignment in PR target/38736 Ian Lance Taylor
15:36 Re: Options of fixing biggest alignment in PR target/38736 Richard Guenther
15:31 Re: Options of fixing biggest alignment in PR target/38736 Ian Lance Taylor
15:03 Re: Options of fixing biggest alignment in PR target/38736 H.J. Lu
12:17 Re: Getting calling function in the C frontend Per Ekman
10:59 Re: fbranch-probabilities bug Hariharan
09:56 Re: Options of fixing biggest alignment in PR target/38736 Richard Guenther
06:59 having trouble with define_split Sean D'Epagnier
05:42 Re: Options of fixing biggest alignment in PR target/38736 Ian Lance Taylor
01:36 Re: Options of fixing biggest alignment in PR target/38736 H.J. Lu
01:22 Re: Options of fixing biggest alignment in PR target/38736 Ian Lance Taylor
01:15 Re: Options of fixing biggest alignment in PR target/38736 H.J. Lu
01:12 Re: Options of fixing biggest alignment in PR target/38736 H.J. Lu
00:56 Re: Options of fixing biggest alignment in PR target/38736 Ian Lance Taylor

January 08, 2009
23:49 Re: Options of fixing biggest alignment in PR target/38736 Michael Meissner
23:36 Re: Options of fixing biggest alignment in PR target/38736 Ian Lance Taylor
23:35 Re: Options of fixing biggest alignment in PR target/38736 Ian Lance Taylor
22:46 gcc-4.3-20090108 is now available gccadmin
22:28 Re: Options of fixing biggest alignment in PR target/38736 H.J. Lu
21:36 Re: Options of fixing biggest alignment in PR target/38736 Richard Guenther
21:17 Re: Options of fixing biggest alignment in PR target/38736 H.J. Lu
21:00 RE: Feature request concerning opcodes in the function prolog Stefan Dösinger
20:40 Re: Options of fixing biggest alignment in PR target/38736 Ian Lance Taylor
19:51 Re: Options of fixing biggest alignment in PR target/38736 H.J. Lu
19:38 Re: Options of fixing biggest alignment in PR target/38736 Ian Lance Taylor
19:06 Re: Options of fixing biggest alignment in PR target/38736 H.J. Lu
18:49 Re: Options of fixing biggest alignment in PR target/38736 Ian Lance Taylor
18:32 Re: fbranch-probabilities bug Seongbae Park 박성배 朴成培
18:27 Re: Options of fixing biggest alignment in PR target/38736 H.J. Lu
18:22 Re: Getting calling function in the C frontend Ian Lance Taylor
18:16 Re: Options of fixing biggest alignment in PR target/38736 Ian Lance Taylor
18:11 Re: fbranch-probabilities bug Hariharan
18:01 Re: fbranch-probabilities bug Seongbae Park 박성배 朴成培
17:54 RE: Feature request concerning opcodes in the function prolog amylaar
17:15 Re: Options of fixing biggest alignment in PR target/38736 H.J. Lu
15:56 Re: Options of fixing biggest alignment in PR target/38736 H.J. Lu
15:51 RE: Feature request concerning opcodes in the function prolog Stefan Dösinger
15:26 Re: libmudflap and emutls question Jie Zhang
14:38 RE: Feature request concerning opcodes in the function prolog amylaar
14:31 fbranch-probabilities bug Hariharan Sandanagobalane
13:52 RE: Feature request concerning opcodes in the function prolog Stefan Dösinger
13:11 RE: Feature request concerning opcodes in the function prolog Joern Rennecke
12:39 RE: Feature request concerning opcodes in the function prolog Joern Rennecke
08:28 Re: This is a Cygwin failure yeah? Andy Scott
08:27 Getting calling function in the C frontend Per Ekman
02:03 Re: Mixing languages in the same TU and dwarf2out_frame_finish Cary Coutant
00:45 Re: Options of fixing biggest alignment in PR target/38736 Ian Lance Taylor
00:23 RE: Options of fixing biggest alignment in PR target/38736 Ye, Joey

January 07, 2009
23:02 Re: Options of fixing biggest alignment in PR target/38736 Ian Lance Taylor
22:54 Re: Options of fixing biggest alignment in PR target/38736 H.J. Lu
22:47 Re: Options of fixing biggest alignment in PR target/38736 Ian Lance Taylor
22:44 gcc-4.2-20090107 is now available gccadmin
22:34 Re: Feature request concerning opcodes in the function prolog Paolo Bonzini
21:40 RE: Feature request concerning opcodes in the function prolog Stefan Dösinger
20:43 RE: Feature request concerning opcodes in the function prolog Joern Rennecke
19:52 RE: Feature request concerning opcodes in the function prolog Stefan Dösinger
19:17 Re: Feature request concerning opcodes in the function prolog Joern Rennecke
19:12 RE: Feature request concerning opcodes in the function prolog Stefan Dösinger
18:32 Re: Feature request concerning opcodes in the function prolog H.J. Lu
18:30 Re: Options of fixing biggest alignment in PR target/38736 Ian Lance Taylor
18:13 Re: Options of fixing biggest alignment in PR target/38736 H.J. Lu
18:06 Feature request concerning opcodes in the function prolog Stefan Dösinger
17:33 Re: m32c, ivopts, 20000412-6.c DJ Delorie
16:35 Re: Options of fixing biggest alignment in PR target/38736 Ian Lance Taylor
16:31 Re: Options of fixing biggest alignment in PR target/38736 Ian Lance Taylor
16:30 Re: Options of fixing biggest alignment in PR target/38736 Richard Guenther
16:27 Re: Options of fixing biggest alignment in PR target/38736 Ian Lance Taylor
16:26 Re: m32c, ivopts, 20000412-6.c Richard Guenther
16:15 Re: How to define 2 bypasses for a single pair of insn_reservation Vladimir Makarov
16:09 Re: m32c, ivopts, 20000412-6.c DJ Delorie
16:04 Re: Options of fixing biggest alignment in PR target/38736 Richard Guenther
16:02 Re: Options of fixing biggest alignment in PR target/38736 H.J. Lu
15:56 Re: Options of fixing biggest alignment in PR target/38736 Ian Lance Taylor
15:40 Re: About Hazard Recognizer:DFA Maxim Kuvyrkov
15:37 Re: Question about UNSPEC rtx and a new instruction Ian Lance Taylor
15:28 Re: Use longlong.h? Joseph S. Myers
15:27 Mixing languages in the same TU and dwarf2out_frame_finish Diego Novillo
15:23 Re: Options of fixing biggest alignment in PR target/38736 H.J. Lu
12:15 Re: Use longlong.h? Joern Rennecke
12:01 Re: This is a Cygwin failure yeah? Dave Korn
10:43 Re: libmudflap and emutls question Jakub Jelinek
10:39 Re: libmudflap and emutls question Paolo Bonzini
09:55 Re: libmudflap and emutls question Jie Zhang
09:39 Re: Options of fixing biggest alignment in PR target/38736 Richard Guenther
09:24 Options of fixing biggest alignment in PR target/38736 Ye, Joey
09:20 Re: libmudflap and emutls question Paolo Bonzini
09:16 Re: m32c, ivopts, 20000412-6.c Richard Guenther
09:09 Re: libmudflap and emutls question Jie Zhang
09:05 Re: This is a Cygwin failure yeah? Bernd Roesch
09:03 Re: This is a Cygwin failure yeah? Bernd Roesch
08:22 This is a Cygwin failure yeah? Andy Scott
07:52 Re: libmudflap and emutls question Paolo Bonzini
07:31 RE: How to define 2 bypasses for a single pair of insn_reservation Ye, Joey
07:06 Re: How to define 2 bypasses for a single pair of insn_reservation Maxim Kuvyrkov
06:39 RE: How to define 2 bypasses for a single pair of insn_reservation Ye, Joey
06:38 RE: How to define 2 bypasses for a single pair of insn_reservation Ye, Joey
06:15 Question about UNSPEC rtx and a new instruction JCX
00:46 m32c, ivopts, 20000412-6.c DJ Delorie

January 06, 2009
22:30 Re: Thomas Schwinge appointed GNU Hurd maintainer Thomas Schwinge
20:29 GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-01-06) Richard Guenther
18:33 The Linux binutils 2.19.51.0.1 is released H.J. Lu
15:23 Re: Tru64 non-virtual thunks multiply defined Nathan Sidwell
15:12 Re: Tru64 non-virtual thunks multiply defined Peter O'Gorman
14:26 Re: [PING] Re: Patch for Re: out of date docs? Ian Lance Taylor
13:52 Re: Xtensa port maintainer David Edelsohn
11:42 [PING] Re: Patch for Re: out of date docs? Gerald Pfeifer
05:38 Re: Xtensa port maintainer Kaveh R. GHAZI
02:15 Re: Tru64 non-virtual thunks multiply defined Nathan Sidwell
02:03 RE: How to define 2 bypasses for a single pair of insn_reservation Ye, Joey

January 05, 2009
21:33 Re: How to define 2 bypasses for a single pair of insn_reservation Maxim Kuvyrkov
21:24 Re: How to define 2 bypasses for a single pair of insn_reservation Vladimir Makarov
20:56 Re: 4.4 use static_assert or #warning for unimplemented c++0x std libs Joe Buck
20:14 Re: Xtensa port maintainer Sterling Augustine
19:40 4.4 use static_assert or #warning for unimplemented c++0x std libs Chris
18:11 Re: libmudflap and emutls question Frank Ch. Eigler
17:12 Re: libmudflap and emutls question Jie Zhang
16:51 Re: About Hazard Recognizer:DFA Vladimir Makarov
16:01 Re: [IRA] New register allocator question Vladimir Makarov
15:57 Re: [IRA] New register allocator question Vladimir Makarov
09:38 How to define 2 bypasses for a single pair of insn_reservation Ye, Joey
01:32 About Hazard Recognizer:DFA daniel tian

January 04, 2009
15:43 Re: libmudflap and emutls question Frank Ch. Eigler
10:22 libmudflap and emutls question Jie Zhang
07:34 RE: Code Motion after Machine Dependent Reorganization?? Balaji V. Iyer
05:48 Re: writing md rules for fixed-point conversion Chao-Ying Fu

January 03, 2009
20:16 Re: -fargument-noalias-global question Toon Moene
20:15 Re: -fargument-noalias-global question Richard Guenther
20:09 Re: -fargument-noalias-global question Steve Kargl
19:44 Re: -fargument-noalias-global question Toon Moene
19:40 Re: -fargument-noalias-global question Richard Guenther
19:37 Re: -fargument-noalias-global question Toon Moene
19:15 Re: -fargument-noalias-global question Toon Moene
19:11 Re: -fargument-noalias-global question Richard Guenther
18:49 Re: -fargument-noalias-global question Toon Moene
14:45 -fargument-noalias-global question Richard Guenther
13:23 Re: Documentation and behaviour of the "optimize" attribute Richard Sandiford

January 02, 2009
22:45 gcc-4.4-20090102 is now available gccadmin
16:01 writing md rules for fixed-point conversion Sean D'Epagnier
15:05 Re: Documentation and behaviour of the "optimize" attribute H.J. Lu
14:53 Re: Compiler turns off warnings unexpectedly Jakub Jelinek
14:35 RE: [IRA] New register allocator question Bingfeng Mei
12:06 Re: Documentation and behaviour of the "optimize" attribute Richard Guenther
11:51 [IRA] New register allocator question Bingfeng Mei
11:38 Documentation and behaviour of the "optimize" attribute Richard Sandiford
11:05 Re: Compiler turns off warnings unexpectedly Paolo Bonzini
09:35 Re: Compiler turns off warnings unexpectedly Dodji Seketeli

January 01, 2009
22:51 gcc-4.3-20090101 is now available gccadmin
15:01 Building gcc on AIX 5.3 TL08 Perry Smith
02:12 Re: Compiler turns off warnings unexpectedly Jan Engelhardt
02:06 Re: Compiler turns off warnings unexpectedly Andrew Pinski
02:03 Compiler turns off warnings unexpectedly Jan Engelhardt


Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.3