This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Are BOOT_CFLAGS, CFLAGS_FOR_TARGET, and CXXFLAGS_FOR_TARGET necessary and sufficient?

From: "Gordon Magnusson" <gordon dot magnusson at gmail dot com>
To: "Ian Lance Taylor" <iant at google dot com>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 00:01:54 -0800
Subject: Re: Are BOOT_CFLAGS, CFLAGS_FOR_TARGET, and CXXFLAGS_FOR_TARGET necessary and sufficient?
References: <c45c73550812172111w1e330d7dt4986a1f991d835ad@mail.gmail.com> <m37i5y583t.fsf@google.com>

>> make "BOOT_CFLAGS=-O3" "CFLAGS_FOR_TARGET=-O3" "CXXFLAGS_FOR_TARGET=-O3"
> Seems right to me.  What happened when you tried it?

I figured that "ask" instead of "try it and see what happens" was a
better idea, especially because that wouldn't identify unnecessary
variables.

> Note that gcc@gcc.gnu.org is for the development of gcc.  Questions
> about using and building gcc should normally go to
> gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org.

Aha, thanks!

References:
- Are BOOT_CFLAGS, CFLAGS_FOR_TARGET, and CXXFLAGS_FOR_TARGET necessary and sufficient?
  - From: Gordon Magnusson
- Re: Are BOOT_CFLAGS, CFLAGS_FOR_TARGET, and CXXFLAGS_FOR_TARGET necessary and sufficient?
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]