This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: libjava and raw_cxx

From: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
To: Andreas Schwab <schwab at suse dot de>
Cc: Ralf Wildenhues <Ralf dot Wildenhues at gmx dot de>, Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu dot org>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, java at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 18:41:47 +0000
Subject: Re: libjava and raw_cxx
References: <jey6ylpiud.fsf@sykes.suse.de> <494297DB.7060203@gnu.org> <je3agtp9v2.fsf@sykes.suse.de> <20081212175212.GA13240@ins.uni-bonn.de> <jey6ylnsvs.fsf@sykes.suse.de>

Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Ralf Wildenhues <Ralf.Wildenhues@gmx.de> writes:
> 
>> So I don't see how to avoid a test here, and hard-coding "yes" for
>> gentoo and "no" for most other distros sounds pretty ugly.
> 
> And not very accurate either.

What is done to solve the same problem in libstdc++?

Andrew.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: libjava and raw_cxx
  - From: Andreas Schwab

References:
- libjava and raw_cxx
  - From: Andreas Schwab
- Re: libjava and raw_cxx
  - From: Paolo Bonzini
- Re: libjava and raw_cxx
  - From: Andreas Schwab
- Re: libjava and raw_cxx
  - From: Ralf Wildenhues
- Re: libjava and raw_cxx
  - From: Andreas Schwab

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]