This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Should 27_io/ios_base/storage/2.cc be XFAILed on powerpc64-apple-darwin9?
- From: Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo dot med dot uc dot edu>
- To: Paolo Carlini <paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com>
- Cc: Bradley Lucier <lucier at math dot purdue dot edu>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 09:21:10 -0500
- Subject: Re: Should 27_io/ios_base/storage/2.cc be XFAILed on powerpc64-apple-darwin9?
- References: <2B639079-F907-465B-98FA-7AB4A9323210@math.purdue.edu> <49253950.9070403@oracle.com>
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 11:17:52AM +0100, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> Hi,
> > Should this be XFAILed on powerpc64-apple-darwin9?
> A patch doing that is essentially preapproved if you can confirm that in
> the meanwhile the malloc bug (Radar 3884894) has been fixed for
> i386-apple-darwin and not for powerpc64-apple-darwin. Can you do that?
>
> Thanks,
> Paolo.
>
Paolo,
The 27_io/ios_base/storage/2.cc test case has also failed for
on i686-apple-darwin9 at -m64 for as long as I can recall...
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-11/msg01712.html
Does anyone here have full developer ADC access? If so, could
someone check to see if a radar was ever opened for the failures
at -m64 for this testcase and if this might have been fixed in
the newer Xcode releases that contain gcc-4.2?
Jack