This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: bug in GCC or C++ standard ?

From: René Bürgel <r dot buergel at unicontrol dot de>
To: Mark Tall <mtall dot qld at gmail dot com>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 12:24:11 +0100
Subject: Re: bug in GCC or C++ standard ?
References: <491AAEAE.8090102@unicontrol.de> <454c00060811120300ya19f201xe98b2c955bf2153e@mail.gmail.com>

Mark Tall schrieb:

On 12/11/2008, René Bürgel <r.buergel@unicontrol.de> wrote:
If all members of the union are const, why don't you just make the union itself const?
The const for the union seems to be ignored

I'd say, that's the real bug, at least from my point of view. I don't know, if this case is handled in the standard, but as "const union" is declaration and definition the const shouldn't be ignored.

--
René Bürgel
Software Engineer
Unicontrol Systemtechnik GmbH
OT Dittersbach
Sachsenburger Weg 34
09669 Frankenberg

Tel.: 03 72 06/ 88 73 - 19
Fax: 03 72 06/ 88 73 - 60
E-Mail: r.buergel@unicontrol.de
Internet: www.unicontrol.de

Unicontrol Systemtechnik GmbH
Geschäftsführer: Dipl.-Ing. Siegfried Heinze
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Frankenberg
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Chemnitz, HRB 15 475

Follow-Ups:
- Re: bug in GCC or C++ standard ?
  - From: Lawrence Crowl

References:
- Re: bug in GCC or C++ standard ?
  - From: René Bürgel
- Re: bug in GCC or C++ standard ?
  - From: Mark Tall

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]