This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: A happy problem caused by loongson2f's div.g instruction


> So I think one of the possible solution would be to reverse the div.g and teq insn.
> And I think this is not hard to do, just modify mips_output_division() function.
> Also I think this is a better solution, since we can save a register.

Do you mean the modification like this?

+
+
+/* Used to output (d)div(u).g or (d)mod(u).g instruction of loongson,
+	+   which takes three operands, and put the result in the rd register.
+	+   Hence emit the divide-by-zeor check before the DIVISION, in case
+	+   that the rd and rt are the same one. */
+const char *
+mips_output_division_g (const char *division, rtx *operands)
+{
+  if (TARGET_CHECK_ZERO_DIV)
+    {
+      output_asm_insn ("bne\t%2,%.,1f%#\n\tbreak\t7\n1:", operands);
+    }
+  return division;
+}
+		

+;; For loongson
+
+(define_insn "divsi3"
+  [(set (match_operand:SI 0 "register_operand" "=d")
+   (div:SI (match_operand:SI 1 "register_operand" "d")
+       (match_operand:SI 2 "register_operand" "d")))]
+  "TARGET_LOONGSON2E || TARGET_LOONGSON2F"
+  { return mips_output_division_g ("div.g\t%0,%1,%2", operands); }
+  [(set_attr "type"    "divg")
+   (set_attr "mode"    "SI")
+   (set (attr "length")
+        (if_then_else (ne (symbol_ref "TARGET_CHECK_ZERO_DIV") (const_int 0))
+                      (const_int 16)
+                      (const_int 4)))])
+
+(define_insn "udivsi3"
+  [(set (match_operand:SI 0 "register_operand" "=d")
+   (udiv:SI (match_operand:SI 1 "register_operand" "d")
+       (match_operand:SI 2 "register_operand" "d")))]
+  "TARGET_LOONGSON2E || TARGET_LOONGSON2F"
+  { return mips_output_division_g ("divu.g\t%0,%1,%2", operands); }
+  [(set_attr "type"    "divg")
+   (set_attr "mode"    "SI")
+   (set (attr "length")
+        (if_then_else (ne (symbol_ref "TARGET_CHECK_ZERO_DIV") (const_int 0))
+                      (const_int 16)
+                      (const_int 4)))])

2008/11/10 Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com>:
> Zhang Le wrote:
>
>>
>> The other would be make sure the destination register is different from source registers.
>> I have read some docs, but still not sure how to do it.
>
> That's just an earlyclobber.  Search for that.
>
> Andrew.
>


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]