This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: RFC: A new meta intrinsic header file for x86 intrinsics
- From: Michael Matz <matz at suse dot de>
- To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
- Cc: GCC Development <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "Ye, Joey" <joey dot ye at intel dot com>, "Guo, Xuepeng" <xuepeng dot guo at intel dot com>, "Girkar, Milind" <milind dot girkar at intel dot com>
- Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 16:28:39 +0100 (CET)
- Subject: Re: RFC: A new meta intrinsic header file for x86 intrinsics
- References: <6dc9ffc80804041013mfdce2b4g61bf923e6dc9d66f@mail.gmail.com> <47FBDF5F.2010800@codesourcery.com> <20080409013801.GA13627@lucon.org> <47FC28A6.7080800@codesourcery.com> <6dc9ffc80811031417p714515cep15e7fdf9fee2653a@mail.gmail.com>
Hi HJ,
On Mon, 3 Nov 2008, H.J. Lu wrote:
> Icc will introduce <immintrin.h> to support intrinsics for current and
> future instruction sets, starting with AVX.
So how about the (IMO) nicer name this list came up the last time this was
brought up (April): x86intrin.h .
> My question is if we should put AVX intrinsics directly in immintrin.h
> or in a separate file.
Separate file seems more consistent.
Ciao,
Michael.