This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
RE: Defining a common plugin machinery
- From: "Grigori Fursin" <grigori dot fursin at inria dot fr>
- To: "'Dave Korn'" <dave dot korn at artimi dot com>, "'Diego Novillo'" <dnovillo at google dot com>, "'Hugh Leather'" <hughleat at hotmail dot com>
- Cc: "'Brendon Costa'" <bcosta at avdat dot com dot au>, "'Taras Glek'" <tglek at mozilla dot com>, "'Basile STARYNKEVITCH'" <basile at starynkevitch dot net>, <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "'Sean Callanan'" <spyffe at cs dot sunysb dot edu>, "'Cupertino Miranda'" <cupertino dot miranda at inria dot fr>, <clattner at apple dot com>, <iant at google dot com>, "'Taras Glek'" <taras dot judge at shaw dot ca>, "'Mike O'Boyle'" <mob at inf dot ed dot ac dot uk>
- Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 18:14:12 +0200
- Subject: RE: Defining a common plugin machinery
- References: <48CF93F7.8010901@google.com> <48E45457.2090408@starynkevitch.net> <48E461CA.9030808@avdat.com.au> <48E46A64.9060406@starynkevitch.net> <48EA89AB.6080707@mozilla.com> <48eda3c7.0405560a.7aa9.1031@mx.google.com> <48EDA48E.6060004@mozilla.com> <48EDA5D7.2050305@avdat.com.au> <48eda87d.0437560a.43f7.11c2@mx.google.com> <BLU142-DAV8F41EC60D9554F88946FAC13A0@phx.gbl> <b798aad50810090626m6bdda24dtf875d5fe2f699c32@mail.gmail.com> <047601c92a27$2e39c980$9601a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> <48ee2b21.1c365e0a.6678.0896@mx.google.com> <047c01c92a29$5019bea0$9601a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
That's right - I just now need to fight my laziness
and at some point write a few lines of code for the wrapper ;) ...
Cheers,
Grigori
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Korn [mailto:dave.korn@artimi.com]
> Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2008 6:09 PM
> To: 'Grigori Fursin'; 'Diego Novillo'; 'Hugh Leather'
> Cc: 'Brendon Costa'; 'Taras Glek'; 'Basile STARYNKEVITCH'; gcc@gcc.gnu.org; 'Sean Callanan';
> 'Cupertino Miranda'; clattner@apple.com; iant@google.com; 'Taras Glek'; 'Mike O'Boyle'
> Subject: RE: Defining a common plugin machinery
>
> Grigori Fursin wrote on 09 October 2008 17:03:
>
> > Well, I see the point and I am fine with that. And as I mentioned I can
> > continue using some patches for my projects that currently use
> > environment variables or later move to the GCC wrappers if the majority
> > decides not to support this mode ;)
>
> Wrappers could look up your preferred environment variables and turn them
> into the appropriate command-line options! :)
>
> cheers,
> DaveK
> --
> Can't think of a witty .sigline today....