This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Help with IA64 profiling bug - g++.dg/tree-prof/indir-call-prof.C

From: Steve Ellcey <sje at cup dot hp dot com>
To: Andreas Schwab <schwab at suse dot de>
Cc: Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2008 15:44:32 -0700
Subject: Re: Help with IA64 profiling bug - g++.dg/tree-prof/indir-call-prof.C
References: <200810062318.m96NIWM07066@lucas.cup.hp.com> <jeprmcbdsw.fsf@sykes.suse.de> <1223488856.14403.42.camel@hpsje.cup.hp.com> <jer66qn2ng.fsf@sykes.suse.de>
Reply-to: sje at cup dot hp dot com

On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 00:27 +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:

> I don't see that problem here.  The variable is set at the right places,
> except that it is set to the address of the vtable descriptor, which is
> different to the normal descriptor.  When I modify
> __gcov_indirect_call_profiler to compare the actual function addresses
> the testcase works as expected.
> 
> Andreas.

Does that mean you have a patch?  I tried changing
__gcov_indirect_call_profiler but got nowhere.

Steve Ellcey
sje@cup.hp.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Help with IA64 profiling bug - g++.dg/tree-prof/indir-call-prof.C
  - From: Andreas Schwab

References:
- Help with IA64 profiling bug - g++.dg/tree-prof/indir-call-prof.C
  - From: Steve Ellcey
- Re: Help with IA64 profiling bug - g++.dg/tree-prof/indir-call-prof.C
  - From: Andreas Schwab
- Re: Help with IA64 profiling bug - g++.dg/tree-prof/indir-call-prof.C
  - From: Steve Ellcey
- Re: Help with IA64 profiling bug - g++.dg/tree-prof/indir-call-prof.C
  - From: Andreas Schwab

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]